TEVA (Toronto Electric Vehicle Association) is a specialized distributor focused on electric vehicle content tailored for the Canadian market. Their offerings delve into electric cars and related topics, providing insights pertinent to consumers and enthusiasts within Canada.
The channel's expertise is clearly demonstrated through its regular coverage of popular electric and hybrid models, including comparisons and reviews of vehicles such as the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid, Range Rover Sport PHEV, Volvo V60 T8 Polestar Engineered, Mercedes EQB, Tesla Model Y, Mini Cooper SE, BMW i3, and Mercedes GLC 350e.
The channel's expertise is clearly demonstrated through its regular coverage of popular electric and hybrid models, including comparisons and reviews of vehicles such as the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid, Range Rover Sport PHEV, Volvo V60 T8 Polestar Engineered, Mercedes EQB, Tesla Model Y, Mini Cooper SE, BMW i3, and Mercedes GLC 350e.
2020 Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid vs Range Rover Sport PHEV
This video presents a comprehensive comparison between the 2020 Porsche Cayenne e-hybrid and the Range Rover Sport PHEV (P400e). The reviewer highlights the Cayenne's superior performance, noting its faster acceleration and sportier driving dynamics, making it the preferred choice for those prior...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 130 total titles. Page 1 of 6.
2026 Nissan Leaf SV+ vs Fiat 500e Giorgio Armani First Impressions and Comparison
The 2026 Nissan Leaf SV Plus is presented as a significant upgrade over its predecessor, boasting a larger 75 kWh liquid-cooled battery and a modern e... morexterior design reminiscent of the larger Ariya. Priced competitively around $48,000 CAD (before freight), it offers a compelling value proposition, especially when compared to the Fiat 500e Giorgio Armani edition at a similar price point. Key advantages highlighted include its substantially longer estimated range (488 km claimed, though winter conditions reduce this) and the innovative dual charging port setup (NACS and J1772), a feature usually found on much more expensive vehicles. The interior shares similarities with the Ariya, featuring electric seats on the SV Plus trim and a familiar screen layout. However, the reviewer notes that rear passenger space is quite limited, particularly for taller individuals, and the absence of one-pedal driving is a drawback. While acceleration is described as decent (215 hp) and the ride secure, some road and wind noise are present, which is considered normal for the price bracket. The ProPilot Assist is noted as adaptive cruise with auto-steer, but not full auto-steer. Overall, the Leaf is seen as a strong contender, particularly for its practicality and charging convenience, despite its rear seating limitations. less
2025 Mazda CX90 PHEV Winter Review
This review of the 2025 Mazda CX-90 PHEV focuses on its performance and practicality in true winter conditions. The reviewer highlights the vehicle�... more39;s spacious interior, particularly the captain's chairs in the second row and the accessible third row, though notes that adult comfort in the third row is limited. A significant point of contention is the reduced EV range in cold weather, achieving only 25-30 km compared to the rated 40 km, a 25-30% decrease. The reviewer also criticizes the non-touchscreen infotainment system and the unavailability of certain interior options with the PHEV powertrain. Despite these drawbacks, the reviewer finds the real-world fuel consumption (6.5 L/100km average) to be excellent, significantly better than official ratings, making it a potentially economical choice for short commutes if frequently charged. The reviewer concludes that the PHEV makes the most sense in urban environments with charging access at both ends of the commute. less
2025 BMW M5 Touring vs Mercedes E53 AMG Touring: Battle of Ultimate PHEV Wagons!
The 2025 BMW M5 Touring presents a compelling, albeit expensive, proposition in the plug-in hybrid wagon segment. While its 717 horsepower and blister... moreing 3.3-second 0-100 km/h acceleration are undeniable highlights, its practicality and efficiency in EV mode are tempered by a relatively small 18 kWh battery, offering a rated 40 km range. Real-world testing, however, showed an impressive 60 km EV range in favorable conditions, though consumption can be high when driven aggressively. The wagon body style offers significantly more cargo space than the sedan, a key advantage. However, the M5 Touring faces stiff competition from the Mercedes-AMG E53 Touring, which is approximately $20,000 cheaper, offers a larger battery (over 20 kWh) for a longer EV range (60 km rated), and features DC fast charging capability and an opening sunroof, features the BMW lacks. The reviewer leans towards the Mercedes for its better value and practicality, despite the BMW's superior performance. The M5 Touring's Assist Plus hands-free system is also noted for its limitations, being geofenced to specific highways and less reliable in adverse weather compared to competitors. less
2025 Ford Mustang Mach E Rally
The 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally is reviewed in challenging winter conditions, offering a second look a year after its launch. This Rally version bu... moreilds upon the GT trim, retaining its 480 horsepower but adding cosmetic enhancements, Brembo brakes, and a unique "Rally Sport" mode. The reviewer notes that while the interior is largely unchanged, the exterior styling is more aggressive, particularly with the large rear wing. Performance in sub-zero temperatures and snow was tested, with "all-weather" tires providing decent grip, though not specifically snow tires. Real-world consumption varied significantly, ranging from 21 kWh/100km on highways to a high of 31 kWh/100km, especially when navigating to a Tesla Supercharger, which the reviewer suspects triggered battery preconditioning despite Google Maps indicating incompatibility. Fast charging speeds were initially strong but ramped down quickly above 50% state of charge. The "Rally Sport" mode enhances the driving experience with aggressive sound effects and allows for wheel spin, though the reviewer found the acceleration not as violently quick as some competitors. A key drawback highlighted is the low front spoiler, which impedes proper parking at some charging stations, necessitating sideways parking. The reviewer concludes that the $5,000 premium over the GT for the Rally's styling and features is a personal choice, acknowledging its continued viability as an electric SUV alternative. less
2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ vs Rivian R1S Dual Motor Performance
The 2025 Cadillac Escalade IQ and Rivian R1S Dual Motor Performance are pitched as similarly priced, large electric SUVs, but they cater to different ... morepriorities. The Escalade IQ positions itself as a luxurious, city-focused limousine with an opulent interior, featuring a full-width screen and premium amenities. However, its interior space, particularly the second and third rows, is surprisingly cramped due to the high floor necessitated by its large battery, and access to the third row is difficult. While it boasts impressive technology like Super Cruise, its real-world highway range falls significantly short of its 700 km rating, averaging around 400-500 km in late fall conditions, with consumption reaching up to 50 kWh/100km. Charging speeds, even with preconditioning, were moderate, peaking around 111 kW on a 350 kW CCS charger. The Rivian R1S, conversely, is presented as a more off-road capable vehicle, though its dual-motor performance variant with off-road tires also impacts range and acceleration. The reviewer highlights the R1S's better third-row access and space compared to the Escalade IQ, despite the latter being larger. The R1S's heat pump can be noisy, and its suspension, while offering adjustability, can be harsh in sport mode. Its real-world consumption was comparable to the Escalade IQ in city driving (around 3.8 km/kWh), but highway efficiency was better (around 3.4 km/kWh). Ultimately, the choice hinges on priorities: luxury and tech for the Escalade IQ, or off-road prowess and better third-row practicality for the R1S. less
2025 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring vs Volvo EX90 Twin Power Performance
This video provides a first impression comparison between the 2025 Lucid Gravity Grand Touring and the Volvo EX90 Twin Power Performance, focusing on ... moretheir premium three-row electric SUV offerings. The reviewer highlights significant advantages for the Lucid Gravity, particularly in interior space, with a notably more accommodating third row and a much larger, more practical frunk compared to the Volvo. The Gravity's electric-assisted features, such as the powered frunk and second-row seats, are contrasted with the Volvo's more manual operations. While the Grand Touring model tested is a higher trim, the upcoming Gravity Touring is expected to match the EX90's price point, offering comparable performance and range, albeit with a smaller battery. The reviewer is highly impressed with the Gravity's driving dynamics, quiet interior, and overall premium feel, suggesting it surpasses both the Volvo and Tesla interiors. The Volvo EX90, while capable, is criticized for its less intuitive software, a finicky key card, and a cramped third row, making the Lucid Gravity the clear favorite for space and overall user experience, even before a full week of testing. less
2025 Jeep Wagoneer S vs Volvo EX40 Comparison Review
The 2025 Jeep Wagoneer S is presented as a highly impressive, first-ever fully electric Jeep, positioning itself as a strong contender in the premium ... moreEV market. The reviewer highlights its significantly superior performance, boasting 600 horsepower and a 3.4-second 0-100 km/h time, which is substantially faster than the Volvo EX40. The Wagoneer S offers a larger interior and trunk space, and a more competitive starting price, especially the anticipated $59,000 base model, making it a better value proposition than the similarly priced, yet less powerful and smaller Volvo EX40. Key advantages noted include its powerful acceleration, spaciousness, and a more realistic highway range (around 425 km with eco tires). However, criticisms are leveled at the flimsy cargo cover, the need to re-enable max regen and creep settings after each drive, and the tiny head-up display. Despite these drawbacks, the reviewer expresses strong positive sentiment, considering it a potential purchase over other EVs if the base model were available at the time of their Audi purchase, and strongly recommends it over the Volvo EX40. less
2025 Cadillac Vistiq vs Rivian R1S
The 2025 Cadillac Vistiq is presented as a compelling alternative to the Rivian R1S, offering a significantly better value proposition. While the Rivi... morean R1S starts at a much higher price point ($140k-$200k) and is positioned as more off-road focused, the Vistiq, priced between $80k-$125k, provides comparable or superior space and performance for a lower cost. The Vistiq boasts more third-row legroom and easier access compared to the R1S, and its 0-60 mph time of 3.7 seconds is quicker than the base R1S. The reviewer highlights the Vistiq's upscale interior, advanced features like Super Cruise (which operates on more roads than Ford's Blue Cruise), and a practical charging port location, though parking at Tesla Superchargers can be challenging due to its length and port placement. Real-world highway range is estimated between 350-400 km, with city driving potentially reaching 500 km, falling short of the optimistic 485 km rated range. Despite some minor drawbacks like the inability to completely disable fake engine sounds and the manual initiation of lane changes, the Vistiq is lauded as an incredible deal in the luxury three-row electric SUV segment. less
2025 Ford F-150 Hybrid King Ranch vs Lightning Lariat Part 2 and Conclusion
This video provides a comprehensive comparison between the 2025 Ford F-150 King Ranch Hybrid and the F-150 Lightning Lariat, both priced identically a... moreround $100,000 CAD. The reviewer highlights significant cost advantages for the all-electric Lightning, estimating fuel savings of over $100 per week compared to the hybrid, alongside reduced maintenance costs due to regenerative braking and fewer mechanical parts. While the hybrid offers a longer single-tank range (over 900 km tested) and slightly higher towing capacity (11,200 lbs vs. 10,000 lbs), the Lightning boasts superior performance with 580 horsepower and a 0-100 km/h time of 3.9 seconds, compared to the hybrid's 430 horsepower and 5.4-second acceleration. The reviewer also notes interior differences, favoring the hybrid's physical buttons over the Lightning's screen-centric controls, but ultimately concludes that the Lightning is the superior choice due to its performance, lower running costs, and overall value proposition, calling it a "no-brainer" for buyers. less
2025 Mercedes G580 EQ vs Cadillac Escalade IQ: The Battle of $200k CAD Full-Size EV SUVs
The 2025 Mercedes G580 EQ represents the first all-electric iteration of the iconic G-Class, aiming to blend its legendary off-road heritage with mode... morern EV technology. Priced around $200,000 CAD, it offers comparable acceleration (4.7 seconds 0-100 km/h) to the Cadillac Escalade IQ, though its 116 kWh battery provides a significantly shorter official range of 485 km compared to the Escalade's 750 km. The reviewer notes the G580 EQ's unique "hugging" feature during cornering and acceleration, and the optional, albeit artificial, V8 sound effects. While praised for its handmade Austrian construction and unique character, its practicality is questioned due to a smaller trunk, lack of a frunk, and a less spacious interior than the larger Escalade. Charging speeds at Tesla Superchargers were also found to be slower than the Escalade's, potentially due to adapter limitations. The reviewer leans towards the G580 EQ for its uniqueness, but acknowledges the Escalade's superior range and practicality, suggesting a full week with the Cadillac might sway opinion. less
2025 Ford Mustang Mach E GT vs Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD
The 2025 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance and Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD are compared, highlighting their near-identical pricing despite significa... morent performance and feature differences. The Mach-E GT is praised for its quicker acceleration (3.7s vs 4.8s) and more traditional interior layout with physical buttons and a traditional dashboard, which the reviewer prefers over the Model Y's screen-centric controls. The Ford's Bang & Olufsen sound system is also noted as superior. However, the Model Y boasts better efficiency, a larger battery (though estimated smaller gross capacity), and a more advanced FSD system that can drive itself to a destination, a feature the Ford's Blue Cruise, while hands-free on highways, cannot match. The Model Y also offers electrically folding rear seats and a more practical trunk shelf. Despite the Mach-E GT's higher price when options are included, the reviewer leans towards it for its more engaging driving experience and familiar controls, though acknowledges the Model Y's technological advancements and efficiency. less
Electric Hydrofoil Prototype First Impressions Made in Canada Envgo NV1
This video provides an in-depth first look at the Envgo NV1, an electric hydrofoil boat prototype. The reviewer highlights the NV1's key advantag... morees: significantly extended range (projected 120 km, currently achieving 80 km) due to lifting out of the water, a quiet and smooth ride with minimal wake, and advanced features like autonomous underwater detection and dock assist. The NV1 utilizes a 80 kWh NMC battery, similar to Tesla's, and boasts a top foiling speed of 80 km/h, with a cruising speed of 40 km/h, requiring 35 km/h to engage the foils. The boat is constructed from carbon fiber and fiberglass, with a foam core, and features a dual-propeller system controlled via fly-by-wire technology, similar to drone controls. While the prototype has some areas for refinement, such as window materials and sound insulation, the overall impression is highly positive, emphasizing its potential for a revolutionary boating experience. The projected price is $400,000 USD, with deliveries anticipated for late 2026. less
2025 Ford Maverick XLT Hybrid
The 2025 Ford Maverick XLT Hybrid presents itself as Canada's most affordable hybrid compact pickup, starting at $39,000 CAD. The reviewer highli... moreghts its shared platform with the Escape and Bronco Sport, noting the Escape and Corsair's discontinuation to make way for electric platforms. While praised for its impressive fuel economy, achieving as low as 4 L/100km in the city and just over 5 L/100km on the highway in stop-and-go traffic, the Maverick XLT falls short in interior space, particularly for rear passengers, and bed utility. The reviewer found the rear seating to be tight and the bed size limited for larger items. Practicality is further impacted by the lack of features like adaptive cruise control and a power outlet in the bed (though a 120V outlet is present). Despite these drawbacks, its affordability and hybrid efficiency position it as a compelling, albeit basic, work vehicle for those prioritizing cost over premium features and maximum utility. less
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs Kia EV9 Sibling Rivalry Comparison Part 1
The 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 9 is presented as a compelling, well-equipped, and impressively priced three-row electric SUV, positioned as a strong contender... more against its sibling, the Kia EV9. The reviewer highlights the Ioniq 9's attractive design, larger sunroof, and a more user-friendly interior layout with physical buttons for essential functions, which are praised over the EV9's. Performance is noted as ample for highway driving, with the top-tier Calligraphy AWD model boasting 429 horsepower. Real-world highway range testing in ideal summer conditions exceeded the rated 500 km, achieving as low as 20 kWh/100km. However, charging experiences were mixed, with issues encountered at Electrify Canada stations using a CCS adapter due to the car's native NACS port, and slower-than-expected speeds at a Tesla Supercharger. The reviewer commends Hyundai for the vehicle's luxury feel, comfort, and advanced driver-assistance systems, particularly the Highway Driving Assist 2, which allowed for extended hands-free driving. Despite not testing winter range, the overall verdict is highly positive, emphasizing its value proposition against luxury competitors. less
2025 Mercedes E53 AMG PHEV vs BMW M5 and 550e Part 3 Final and Conclusion
The 2025 Mercedes E53 AMG Plug-in Hybrid is positioned as a compelling alternative between the BMW 550e and M5, offering a potent blend of performance... more and electric range. The reviewer highlights its impressive 577 horsepower (up to 605 with Race Start) and a usable 21 kWh battery, delivering a rated electric range of 69 km, significantly more than its BMW rivals. Key advantages noted over the BMWs include the opening sunroof and the capability for 60 kW DC fast charging, which proved effective in extending electric-only travel. The reviewer was particularly impressed by the vehicle's efficiency in hybrid mode, achieving a remarkable 3.3 L/100km, rivaling the Toyota Prius Prime. However, the E53 AMG is not without its drawbacks. The rear seat space is described as limited, potentially causing discomfort for taller passengers. Additionally, despite a high starting price and numerous optional packages, features like a head-up display, soft-close doors, and rear sunshades remain optional extras, which is seen as a surprising omission. The reviewer's preference leans towards the E53 AMG due to its sunroof and fast-charging capabilities, making it their vehicle of choice over the BMWs, though they lament the lack of a wagon variant in North America. less
2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV RST
The 2025 Chevrolet Silverado EV RST is presented as a formidable contender in the electric pickup truck segment, directly challenging rivals like the ... moreFord F-150 Lightning and Rivian R1T. This top-tier RST trim boasts the largest 205 kWh battery, delivering an impressive rated range of 795 km, significantly outperforming the Lightning's nearly 500 km. While not as quick as the Lightning (0-100 km/h in under 4.5 seconds vs. 4 seconds flat), its substantial power (750 hp) and advanced features like air suspension and four-wheel steering are highlighted as key advantages. The reviewer praises the distinct EV styling, the functional frunk, and the innovative midgate feature, which allows for extended cargo length. However, the user interface is criticized for being unintuitive and complicated, and the lack of a manual sunshade for the fixed glass sunroof is noted as a drawback. Charging speeds, while capable of 350 kW, were limited to 120 kW in testing due to charger availability, though the sustained speed at higher states of charge is commendable. Despite preferring the Lightning's sunroof, the Silverado EV's superior range and practical features make it a compelling option. less
2025 Kia EV6 GT Line AWD Facelifted With Quite A Few Upgrades
The 2025 Kia EV6 GT Line AWD receives a significant facelift, highlighted by a redesigned front fascia with a new DRL signature and a full-width '... more;unibrow' light bar. The most substantial upgrade is the increased battery capacity, moving from 77 kWh to 84 kWh net usable, promising improved range. A key convenience feature is the integration of a native NACS (Tesla) charging port, eliminating the need for adapters for Tesla Superchargers, though the car still includes adapters for J1772 and CCS. Testing revealed a highway range of approximately 400-458 km, falling short of the 515 km rated range but showing improvement over the previous model. Charging performance was notable, with the native NACS port achieving 120 kW at a Tesla Supercharger from 78% state of charge, outperforming a CCS session at Electrify Canada which peaked at 130 kW but ramped down quickly below 90 kW past 50%. The interior remains largely unchanged, with the exception of an electrically adjustable steering wheel. Performance is enhanced, with 0-100 km/h times dropping to around 4.5 seconds. Overall, the facelifted EV6 GT Line offers a compelling package with enhanced battery, charging convenience, and refined performance. less
2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid AWD Because the PHEV Has Been Discontinued
The 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid presents an attractive value proposition, particularly for those seeking a three-row, mid-size SUV with all-wheel dri... moreve at a starting price of $46,000 CAD. The reviewer highlights the vehicle's spacious interior, comfortable front and second-row seating, and practical features like the large sunroof and ample storage. However, a significant drawback is the discontinuation of the plug-in hybrid variant for the Canadian market, leaving only the standard hybrid. The reviewer notes that the hybrid powertrain, with 232 horsepower, is less powerful than the gasoline version and that the engine can be noisy when engaging. Driving impressions reveal that while the fuel economy is close to Transport Canada's rating (achieving around 5.9 L/100km in the city and 8 L/100km on the highway with climate control), the regenerative braking system, even at its maximum setting, does not allow for true one-pedal driving and the engine engagement can be abrupt. Despite these points, the Santa Fe Hybrid is considered a compelling option compared to similarly priced competitors. less
2026 BMW iX 60 xDrive Assist Plus Hands Free With Eye Movement Detection
The 2026 BMW iX60 xDrive receives a significant refresh, focusing on increased power and improved range. The reviewer highlights the upgraded powertra... morein, now delivering 539 horsepower, and a larger 110 kWh battery, contributing to a posted range of 586 km. Real-world testing yielded impressive results, with highway range reaching approximately 550 km even with climate control active, and city driving achieving around 620 km. The reviewer praises the car's lightweight construction and dedicated EV platform for enhancing efficiency. However, the interior, while functional, remains largely unchanged. A notable drawback is the Bowers & Wilkins sound system's vibrating subwoofer, which the reviewer found distracting. Performance is described as quick but not class-leading, with a 0-60 mph time of 4.6 seconds. The standout feature is the enhanced 'Assist Plus' hands-free driving system, now allowing lane changes initiated by simply looking at the rearview mirror, a significant improvement over previous versions. While the iX60 offers strong range and advanced driver assistance, its dated interior and the annoying sound system are points of concern. less
2025 Audi SQ6 Etron Quattro vs Mercedes GLC 63 AMG SE Performance
This video pits the 2025 Audi SQ6 Etron Quattro against the Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 SE Performance plug-in hybrid, highlighting their similar pricing and ... moreperformance. The Audi SQ6, a pure electric SUV, boasts 509 horsepower and an 800-volt system capable of 270 kW fast charging, though real-world highway range was observed around 400-450 km in summer conditions (21-22 kWh/100km). Key features include customizable LED light signatures, a passenger display, and the introduction of true one-pedal driving with 'B' mode. The Mercedes GLC 63 AMG SE Performance, a plug-in hybrid, offers a staggering 671 horsepower from a 2.0L turbo-four and electric motors, achieving 0-100 km/h in 3.5 seconds. Its hybrid system prioritizes performance over electric range, offering only about 10-15 km. The reviewer notes the GLC's trunk packaging is compromised by the battery, while the Audi offers superior trunk space and dual charge ports. While both offer impressive acceleration, the Audi SQ6 is positioned as the current flagship electric SUV from Audi, with the reviewer anticipating a more direct competitor from Audi in the future. less
2025 Toyota Crown Signia Hybrid Limited
The 2025 Toyota Crown Signia Hybrid Limited is presented as a stylish and comfortable alternative to larger hybrid SUVs and minivans. The reviewer hig... morehlights its attractive design, particularly the "fire engine red" color and black/red rim combination, and praises the interior's elegance and the practical inclusion of physical climate controls. Legroom in the rear is noted as ample, though headroom is just adequate for taller passengers. The vehicle's primary drawback is its non-plug-in hybrid nature, with the reviewer expressing a strong desire for a PHEV option. Real-world fuel consumption figures were impressive, with the reviewer achieving 4.3-4.5 L/100km in the city (beating the official rating) and just over 6 L/100km on the highway (matching the rating). The 1.2 kWh NiMH battery and 2.5L four-cylinder engine with two electric motors provide a smooth, comfortable ride, but not sporty performance. The reviewer recommends the Crown Signia for those seeking a hybrid that avoids the typical SUV or van form factor, provided they are content with a standard hybrid system. less
2025 Polestar 3 Performance Winter Test
The 2025 Polestar 3 Performance is reviewed as a premium electric SUV with a starting price of $97,000, reaching $115,000 for the tested performance v... moreariant with optional Napa leather. The reviewer highlights its spacious interior, comfortable seating, and a large panoramic sunroof. However, significant criticisms include a high starting price, disappointing real-world range (estimated 300-350 km in cold/mixed conditions, dropping to around 400 km in warmer weather), and slow DC fast charging speeds (maxing out at 135 kW, far below the advertised 250 kW). The reviewer also notes several software glitches, including a frozen screen, issues with the driver assistance systems, and a peculiar buttonless key fob that requires constant charging. While the performance is adequate with 510 hp and a 4.7-second 0-100 km/h time, it's not class-leading at this price point. The reviewer suggests that significant discounts, up to $20,000 off the purchase price in Canada, make the Polestar 3 a more compelling, albeit still expensive, option. less
2025 Mercedes GLC350e PHEV vs Volvo XC60 T8 Part 2 and Conclusion
The 2025 Mercedes GLC 350e PHEV is presented as a compelling new generation plug-in hybrid, directly competing with the Volvo XC60 T8. The reviewer hi... moreghlights its significantly improved battery capacity (24.8 kWh) over its predecessor, enabling an impressive real-world EV range. During testing, the GLC 350e achieved 93 km on the highway in warmer conditions with winter tires, exceeding its 87 km rated range. Even in colder temperatures (-5°C), it managed 73 km. A key advantage is its optional 60 kW DC fast charging capability, allowing for a 150 km trip with a 20-minute top-up, a feature largely absent in competitors. While the Volvo XC60 T8 offers more power and quicker acceleration, the GLC 350e prioritizes electric range and a more luxurious interior. The reviewer notes the trunk space is compromised due to the larger battery, and the absence of a dedicated battery-recharging mode while driving in gas is a drawback compared to some BMW PHEVs. Despite minor issues like the voice recognition and the need to manually enable fast charging, the GLC 350e is praised for its attractive pricing, substantial EV range, and luxurious appointments, making it a strong contender in the midsize PHEV SUV segment. less
2024 Mercedes EQB300 4Matic vs Audi Q4 Etron 50 Quattro
The 2024 Mercedes EQB300 4Matic is reviewed as a mid-range electric SUV, positioned between the EQB250 and EQB350. While it offers all-wheel drive and... more 225 horsepower, it falls short in acceleration compared to competitors like the Audi Q4 e-tron 50 Quattro and Mini Countryman SE, with a 0-100 km/h time rated at 8 seconds. The 70 kWh battery is smaller than rivals, resulting in a rated range of 330 km, which the reviewer found to be less than 300 km on the highway in winter conditions. Fast charging also underwhelmed, never reaching the advertised 200 kW peak. Positives include a larger trunk space than the Q4 and a comfortable interior with adjustable second-row seats. However, the reviewer notes the lack of standard adaptive cruise control and lane keep assist at its price point (starting at $69,000 before options) as disappointing. The absence of full one-pedal driving is also a drawback. Ultimately, the EQB300's main advantage over its competitors is its trunk size, but it is outmatched in power and range. less