TEVA (Toronto Electric Vehicle Association) is a specialized distributor focused on electric vehicle content tailored for the Canadian market. Their offerings delve into electric cars and related topics, providing insights pertinent to consumers and enthusiasts within Canada.
The channel's expertise is clearly demonstrated through its regular coverage of popular electric and hybrid models, including comparisons and reviews of vehicles such as the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid, Range Rover Sport PHEV, Volvo V60 T8 Polestar Engineered, Mercedes EQB, Tesla Model Y, Mini Cooper SE, BMW i3, and Mercedes GLC 350e.
The channel's expertise is clearly demonstrated through its regular coverage of popular electric and hybrid models, including comparisons and reviews of vehicles such as the Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid, Range Rover Sport PHEV, Volvo V60 T8 Polestar Engineered, Mercedes EQB, Tesla Model Y, Mini Cooper SE, BMW i3, and Mercedes GLC 350e.
2020 Porsche Cayenne E-Hybrid vs Range Rover Sport PHEV
This video presents a comprehensive comparison between the 2020 Porsche Cayenne e-hybrid and the Range Rover Sport PHEV (P400e). The reviewer highlights the Cayenne's superior performance, noting its faster acceleration and sportier driving dynamics, making it the preferred choice for those prior...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 130 total titles. Page 3 of 6.
2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT vs Chevrolet Blazer EV RS
This comparison pits the 2024 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance against the Chevrolet Blazer EV RS, focusing on their value proposition after recent ... moreprice adjustments. The Mustang Mach-E GT, with its performance upgrade, offers a staggering 480 horsepower and 3.5-second 0-60 mph time, starting around $69,000. In contrast, the Blazer EV RS, while also priced similarly (around $68,000 as tested), delivers a more modest 288 horsepower and a 6.2-second acceleration. The reviewer highlights the Mustang's significant performance advantage as a key differentiator, especially considering the comparable pricing. While the Blazer EV offers more rear passenger space and a slightly larger trunk, the Mustang Mach-E GT is presented as the superior performance bargain. The Blazer's lack of Android Auto/Apple CarPlay and the need to wait for the higher-performance SS model are noted drawbacks. The review concludes that, as of now, the Mustang Mach-E GT represents a much better deal for performance enthusiasts, though the Blazer EV might appeal to those prioritizing space. less
2024 Fiat 500e vs Mini Cooper SE: Canada's Lowest Priced EV
The 2024 Fiat 500e is presented as Canada's most affordable EV, starting around $39,900 before incentives, bringing it down to approximately $35,... more000 in Ontario. The reviewer highlights its compact size, making it an ideal city runabout for two people, with limited rear space suitable only for children or pets. Key advantages over competitors like the Mini Cooper SE include a superior rated range of 227 km (potentially up to 295 km in Sherpa mode, though speed-limited) compared to the Mini's 180 km, and faster DC charging capability (up to 85 kW vs. 50 kW). The Fiat also boasts a tighter turning radius. However, the reviewer notes drawbacks such as the basic 117 horsepower engine leading to a 0-100 km/h time of around 9 seconds, and a somewhat fiddly charging level adjustment setting. The wireless charger is also criticized for barely maintaining charge, recommending a cable connection for actual charging. Despite these points, the Fiat 500e is recommended as a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers looking for an EV, especially when compared to the Mini Cooper SE, Mazda MX-30, and base Nissan Leaf. less
2024 Ford F150 Lightning Flash vs Chevrolet Silverado EV 4WT
This video presents a direct comparison between the 2024 Ford F-150 Lightning Flash and the 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV 4WT, both priced around $80,00... more0 CAD. The reviewer highlights significant differences, with the Silverado EV leading in range (720 km vs. 520 km rated) and charging speed (350 kW vs. 150 kW), attributed to its larger estimated 200 kWh battery compared to the Lightning's 130 kWh. However, the F-150 Lightning Flash excels in performance, boasting quicker acceleration (4.2s vs. 5.8s) and a more premium interior with better materials, power-operated front and rear gates, and standard Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. The Silverado EV's interior is described as cheaper, with manual front and rear gates and a lack of smartphone integration. While the Silverado EV offers superior range and charging, the F-150 Lightning Flash is favored for its performance and interior quality, making it a compelling choice for those prioritizing driving dynamics and refinement over maximum range. less
2023 Toyota BZ4X
The 2023 Toyota BZ4X All-Wheel Drive, tested here in the XLE trim, presents a mixed bag for potential EV buyers. While praised for its comfortable int... moreerior, spacious rear seating, decent trunk space, and attractive pricing, significant drawbacks temper enthusiasm. The reviewer highlights a unique but potentially inconvenient dashboard-above-steering-wheel display requiring manual steering wheel adjustment, and a fixed glass roof with an unnecessary central divider. The most critical issues are the exceptionally slow DC fast charging speeds, which fall far short of advertised rates and significantly impact long-distance travel viability, and the unreliability of driver-assist features like adaptive cruise control and voice commands. Despite its strengths, the slow charging and software glitches are major obstacles that may deter purchasers, especially when compared to competitors offering faster charging and more refined systems. less
2024 BMW i7 M70 Flagship vs Mercedes EQS AMG and Taycan 4S
The 2024 BMW i7 M70 is presented as the ultimate electric 7 Series, boasting 750 horsepower and a 3.7-second 0-100 kph time, directly competing with t... morehe Mercedes EQS AMG and Porsche Taycan 4S. The reviewer highlights its impressive acceleration and the accompanying Hans Zimmer-composed sounds, noting the M division's tuning. Despite its performance capabilities, the i7 M70 is praised for its comfort and efficiency on the highway, achieving an impressive range of around 500 km with consumption under 20 kWh/100km, even in hot weather and with climate control active. The reviewer emphasizes that the highway is the optimal environment for this vehicle, as side road driving yields similar consumption without the benefits of efficient cruising. Practical considerations include the trunk space, which is long but not deep, and the interior, which features recycled materials and cloth seats on this particular $225,000 example, though it offers luxurious rear-seat comfort with the optional lounge package. While the car offers an "M" driving experience, the reviewer notes the absence of the "Assist Plus" hands-free driving system on this model, requiring constant steering wheel input, though automatic lane changes are still functional. Overall, the i7 M70 is recommended as a strong contender in its price bracket for those seeking a blend of luxury, performance, and efficiency. less
2024 Dodge Hornet RT Plus PHEV Made in Italy
The 2024 Dodge Hornet RT Plus PHEV, assembled in Italy, is Dodge's first foray into electrification, sharing its platform with the Alfa Romeo Ton... moreale. The reviewer highlights its sporty performance, with a 0-100 km/h time of 5.3 seconds, achieved through a 1.3L turbo-four and two electric motors producing 288 horsepower. The interior is noted as similar to the Alfa, featuring sporty seats and a sunroof, though rear passenger space is tight for taller individuals. The reviewer praises the conventional six-speed transmission over CVTs found in competitors and appreciates the distinct exhaust note tuned by Italians. However, the primary criticism is the steep price, ranging from $60,000 to $70,000 CAD, which is considered high for a compact SUV, especially when compared to larger, more conventional Dodge models or even premium EVs. Real-world electric range exceeded the rated 53 km, achieving around 60 km in hypermiling conditions. Despite the price concerns, it's acknowledged as a capable and sporty plug-in hybrid option. less
2024 Nissan Ariya E4orce AWD Platinum and Why We Chose Q4 Instead for Our Long Term Family Fleet
The 2024 Nissan Ariya e4orce Platinum+ AWD is reviewed as a capable electric SUV with a larger battery and longer rated range (465 km) compared to the... more Audi Q4 e-tron. The reviewer highlights its spacious second row and softer suspension, offering a calmer ride over bumps. However, the handling is criticized for being less composed during acceleration, braking, and cornering, feeling less secure than the Audi. Practical drawbacks include a less intuitive movable center console, a wireless charging pad that causes phones to overheat, and the absence of wireless Android Auto. The reviewer also notes the lack of one-pedal driving, a feature present in the Nissan Leaf. While the top-trim Ariya is priced similarly to a well-optioned Q4, the reviewer ultimately chose the Audi due to significantly more attractive leasing rates and residual values, especially noting a 1.9% lease rate on their Q4 versus Nissan's 4.9% (or a Quebec-only 0% offer). The reviewer concludes that the Ariya, despite its merits, is priced more like a luxury vehicle than a mainstream one, suggesting it should be positioned closer to the Volkswagen ID.4. Real-world highway range was estimated at 400 km, similar to the Audi, despite the Ariya's larger battery. less
2024 Volvo EC40 RWD The Range Master vs Polestar 2 and EX40 Sibling Rivalry
The 2024 Volvo EC40 (formerly C40) RWD 'Range Master' is presented as a compelling option for those prioritizing range over outright perform... moreance, especially when compared to its sibling, the Polestar 2. The reviewer highlights significant upgrades for the 2024 model year, including a larger 79 kWh net battery (up from 75 kWh) and more efficient rear-wheel-drive single motor, boosting the rated range to 485 km. Real-world highway tests showed consumption under 19 kWh/100km northbound and under 18 kWh/100km southbound, translating to an estimated 450-460 km of range. A hypermiling test pushed this further, achieving under 15 kWh/100km for a potential 550-560 km range. While the 250 hp RWD version is slower than the Polestar 2 (7.3s vs 6.3s 0-60 mph), the reviewer notes that the power is still adequate for daily driving and passing. Key criticisms include compromised rear headroom due to the coupe-like styling and a smaller infotainment screen compared to the Polestar. The reviewer also points out that the all-wheel-drive version, offering 400 hp, is only a $3,000 premium but sacrifices significant range. Ultimately, the EC40 RWD is recommended for its impressive range and Belgian manufacturing, positioning it as a practical choice for long-distance travel. less
2024 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV GT vs Kia Sorento PHEV
The 2024 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV GT is presented as a compelling option in the three-row plug-in hybrid SUV segment, particularly for those prioriti... morezing EV range and fast-charging capabilities. The reviewer highlights its significantly improved performance and range over previous generations, noting a real-world EV range of up to 80 km, exceeding its rated 60 km. A key advantage is its inclusion of DC fast charging, a feature rare in this price bracket, setting it apart from competitors like the Kia Sorento PHEV. However, the Outlander PHEV's third-row space is deemed very limited, suitable only for children, and the cargo cover storage is impractical with the third row in use. The reviewer also points out the slow DC charging rate (max 38 kW) and the peculiar cancellation of EV mode when using paddle shifters or 'B' mode. Despite these drawbacks, the Outlander PHEV is considered a strong value proposition, especially when compared to significantly more expensive luxury PHEVs, and is preferred over the Sorento by the reviewer due to its fast-charging capability and the 'charge' mode for the battery. less
2024 Polestar 2 Dual Motor Performance
The 2024 Polestar 2 Dual Motor Performance variant receives a significant update, addressing key areas of efficiency and range. While the exterior des... moreign remains largely similar, the interior benefits from software upgrades and improved app integration via the Google-based system. The reviewer highlights the performance package's 450 horsepower and 4.2-second 0-60 mph acceleration, noting it's competitive but slightly slower than the Tesla Model Y Performance. A major improvement is the highway efficiency, attributed to the front motor's ability to disconnect, allowing for a claimed 400 km highway range. City consumption is also impressive. However, rear passenger space and headroom are noted as tight for taller individuals. A key distinction is made between the AWD/Performance models using an LG battery with slower charging (55 kW) and the RWD version using a CATL battery with much faster charging (205 kW) and longer range (515 km), making the RWD version the recommended choice for road trips. The reviewer praises the improved efficiency, competitive pricing, and attractive lease deals, positioning the Polestar 2 as a strong contender against Tesla and other EVs. less
2024 BMW i5 M60 vs Mercedes EQE AMG Comparison Part 1
This video presents a comparison between the 2024 BMW i5 M60 and the Mercedes EQE AMG, focusing on the BMW's performance and specifications. The ... morereviewer highlights the i5 M60's impressive power output, nearing 600hp, and its rapid acceleration, achieving 0-100 kph in just 3.8 seconds. The vehicle boasts an 84 kWh battery, promising a range of approximately 500 km. The core question posed is whether this potent BMW electric sedan can outperform its Mercedes-Benz counterpart. The video aims to deliver a verdict on this head-to-head matchup. less
2024 BMW 750e PHEV vs Mercedes S580e PHEV Comparison Part 2: Conclusion and Verdict
This video concludes a comparison between the 2024 BMW 750e plug-in hybrid and the Mercedes S580e. The reviewer highlights that while the BMW 750e sta... morerts at a lower price point than the S580e, it offers a smaller battery (14.4 kWh vs. 29 kWh). Despite the battery size difference, the BMW 750e proves to be more efficient, achieving 80 km of pure electric range in hypermiling tests compared to the Mercedes' 95 km, a minimal difference. The reviewer praises the BMW's efficiency, noting its consumption was well under 20 kWh/100km, significantly better than the Mercedes' mid-20s consumption. Key criticisms include the fixed glass sunroof (unlike the Mercedes' opening one, a personal preference for the reviewer) and the headlight design, which can be obstructed by snow and ice. The reviewer also points out the BMW's charging speed limitations (7kW Level 2, no Level 3 option) compared to the Mercedes. Ultimately, the reviewer suggests that for those considering a luxury PHEV, the choice depends on personal preference, but leans towards the pure electric option if pricing is identical, with the Mercedes' opening sunroof being a deciding factor for their family fleet. less
2024 VW ID.4 vs Audi Q4 E-tron Sibling Rivalry Comparison
The 2024 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S AWD receives a significant update, boasting increased horsepower (335 hp) and improved acceleration, now achieving 0-10... more0 km/h in just over 5 seconds. The reviewer highlights interior enhancements, including a larger center screen and the addition of physical climate controls and a touch-sensitive slider. However, the small font size on the dashboard and occasional software glitches, such as Bluetooth connectivity issues, are noted drawbacks. Real-world highway range in colder conditions with headwinds was below the rated 423 km, falling under 400 km. Despite these points, the reviewer praises the overall improvements, making the ID.4 a more competitive offering. The comparison also touches upon the Audi Q4 e-tron, noting its luxury appeal, opening sunroof, and separate climate screen as key differentiators, though the ID.4 Pro S AWD at $63,000 Canadian overlaps with the base Audi Q4 45. less
Switching from Gas to Electric Cars (2024, Kia)
This video serves as a comprehensive guide for dealership sales staff on transitioning consumers from gasoline to electric vehicles. The presenter emp... morehasizes the significant cost savings on fuel and maintenance as primary motivators, highlighting that electric cars have fewer moving parts, leading to reduced service needs and longer brake life due to regenerative braking. The discussion covers various EV types, including Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), and Range Extended Electric Vehicles (REVs), with a focus on Kia's current and upcoming lineup. Charging infrastructure, from Level 1 to Level 3, is detailed, along with the complexities of multiple charging network apps and the emerging compatibility with Tesla's Supercharger network. The presenter also touches upon common consumer concerns like battery life and fire risk, statistically debunking these fears. A key takeaway is the significant cost advantage of EVs over gasoline cars, exemplified by the stark difference in refueling costs. The video also briefly discusses competitor models for Kia's EV offerings, noting the EV9's unique position in the three-row electric SUV market with limited direct competition. less
2024 Kia EV9 GT Line
The 2024 Kia EV9 GT-Line is presented as a compelling option in the three-row electric SUV segment, particularly for its value proposition. The review... moreer highlights its spacious interior, modern design, and the availability of a six-seat configuration with captain's chairs as key strengths. While the third row is noted as tight for taller adults, it's deemed usable for shorter trips. The GT-Line trim, with its 380 horsepower AWD powertrain and 99.8 kWh battery, offers brisk acceleration (5.3 seconds 0-100 km/h) and a respectable, though not always achievable on the highway, estimated range of 435 km. Real-world highway consumption averaged 25-26 kWh/100km in good conditions, rising to 30 kWh/100km with headwinds, while hypermiling yielded 19 kWh/100km. Charging from 10-80% is estimated at 24 minutes. The reviewer praises its advanced driver-assistance systems, including HD2 with auto lane change, and its competitive pricing compared to rivals like the Rivian R1S. The primary drawback identified is the highway range, which may fall short of the rated 435 km unless driven conservatively. Despite this, the EV9 is lauded as a disruptor and the best deal in its class. less
2024 Mercedes EQE SUV AMG vs BMW iX M60
The 2024 Mercedes EQE SUV AMG is presented as a top-tier electric performance SUV, boasting over 600 horsepower and sub-4-second 0-100 kph acceleratio... moren, with a starting price of $129,000 CAD. The reviewer highlights the familiar interior, now featuring the expansive MBUX Hyperscreen, and notes AMG-specific touches like red stitching and seatbelts. While spacious and powerful, the vehicle's real-world energy consumption is a key point of discussion. The reviewer found highway efficiency to be around 24 kWh/100km, with city driving consuming significantly more, upwards of 40 kWh/100km. This suggests it performs better as a highway cruiser than a city car. The reviewer also touches upon its competitive landscape, comparing it to the BMW iX M60 and Tesla Model X, and mentions upcoming upgrades to Mercedes' EQ line, including larger batteries for increased range. The AMG-specific driving modes and adjustable suspension/ESP settings are noted as unique features. less
2023 Mercedes EQS SUV 580
The reviewer tested the 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 580, focusing heavily on its charging performance in winter conditions and comparing it to rivals. ... moreA significant drawback identified was the navigation system's failure to list crucial Canadian charging networks (Ivy, Petro-Canada, Electrify Canada), preventing effective battery preconditioning and impacting charging speeds. While the car promises up to 200 kW charging, real-world winter tests without preconditioning yielded around 110-145 kW, roughly half the expected speed. The reviewer noted that the car's automatic preconditioning function is rendered less useful due to this navigation limitation. In terms of range, the EQS SUV achieved approximately 430 km in warmer weather (25 kWh/100km) but dropped to around 330 km in cold conditions (32.8 kWh/100km), which is understandable for a large, three-row SUV. The interior, particularly the optional MBUX Hyperscreen, is praised for its aesthetics and functionality, though the reviewer highlights the lack of soft-close doors as a disappointment for a vehicle in this price range. The third-row seating is deemed suitable for children or shorter adults due to limited headroom. Overall, the EQS SUV 580 is presented as an amazing vehicle with impressive technology, but potential buyers should be aware of its charging limitations in cold weather and the navigation system's shortcomings in Canada. less
2024 Mercedes S580e PHEV vs BMW 750e PHEV Part 1
The 2024 Mercedes-Benz S580e plug-in hybrid offers a compelling alternative to pure gasoline or full electric vehicles, particularly for executives. T... morehe reviewer highlights its luxurious interior, quiet operation, and the advantage of its PHEV powertrain, which allows for significant electric-only range (up to 94 km achieved in hypermiling tests) ideal for city commutes. The pricing parity with gasoline models and the availability of a CCS fast-charging option (though recommended to be ordered) are noted as key benefits. However, the reviewer points out drawbacks such as the shallow trunk space due to the battery, the non-folding rear seats, and the absence of the Hyperscreen as standard on this $175,000 model. While acceleration is good, it doesn't match the pure electric EQS 580. The reviewer concludes that for city driving and shorter commutes, the electric range is substantial, but highway efficiency is lower, requiring strategic charging stops to minimize gas consumption. The need for more charging infrastructure in commercial buildings is also emphasized. less
2024 Hyundai Kona EV Winter Test TEVAdrive
The 2024 Hyundai Kona EV represents a significant improvement over its predecessor, primarily due to its increased size, bringing it closer to the Nir... moreo EV. The reviewer highlights the new design, including the distinctive unibrow light bar. However, the "Ultimate" trim, priced at $51,000, is noted for still featuring a manual liftgate and a less-than-ideal cargo space for its price point. Interiorly, the dual-screen setup is familiar, but the lack of one-pedal driving and creep mode disablement is a notable drawback compared to other Hyundai/Kia EVs. Winter testing revealed a substantial range deficit, with real-world highway consumption reaching 19 kWh/100km (down from a rated 385km), resulting in a range of just over 300km in cold conditions. Preconditioning the battery was found to be inefficient, increasing consumption without significant charging speed benefits. While the Kona EV offers good tech features like adaptive cruise and auto-steer, its high price point, especially compared to the gas version or other EVs like the Ioniq 5/6 and Tesla Model 3, makes its value proposition questionable for those not on a strict budget. less
2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Preferred RWD Long Range - The Range Master Winter Test
The 2024 Hyundai Ioniq 6 Preferred RWD Long Range is presented as a compelling option for EV buyers prioritizing range, especially in winter condition... mores. The reviewer highlights its impressive real-world consumption figures, achieving around 13.5 kWh/100km in hypermiling and 16.5 kWh/100km on the highway, even with winter tires. This translates to an estimated range of 450-550 km in cool spring temperatures, with projections of 500-600 km in ideal summer conditions. The reviewer praises the generous rear-seat space, superior to the Tesla Model 3, and the car's aerodynamic design contributing to its range. Downsides mentioned include the lack of a glass roof on the base model and the need to navigate climate controls through menus. The reviewer also notes the discontinuation of fast-charging tests due to network inconsistencies and rising costs, opting instead for home charging. Overall, the Ioniq 6 is positioned as a strong contender, offering excellent range for its $55,000 starting price. less
2024 Audi Q4 Etron 50 AWD vs BMW i4 Xdrive 40 Winter Comparison Test Part 2
The reviewer compares the 2024 Audi Q4 Etron 50 AWD with the 2024 BMW i4 xDrive 40, focusing on their suitability for a family fleet. The Audi Q4 Etro... moren is praised for its value, especially the '50' trim which was a great deal at $59,000, offering 300 horsepower and good interior space, particularly in the rear seats, which are noted as significantly more spacious than the BMW i4's. The reviewer highlights the Audi's dedicated MEB platform, which contributes to a better interior feel despite smaller exterior dimensions compared to previous models. Efficiency is a strong point for the Audi, achieving an average consumption of 17.8 kWh/100km on a highway test, surpassing the BMW's 18.9 kWh/100km, even with the Audi on all-season tires and the BMW on winter tires. Key advantages for the Audi include better rear seat space, a higher driving position, a rear wiper (which also cleans the rear camera), and crucially, availability in stock with better financing options (2.9% APR vs. BMW's 4.9% after loyalty discount). The reviewer notes the Audi lacks adaptive cruise control and built-in navigation in the tested trim, requiring reliance on Android Auto/Apple CarPlay. The BMW i4 is described as more expensive, with longer wait times for delivery and tighter rear seating. The reviewer ultimately chose the Audi Q4 Etron due to its superior value proposition, practicality, and immediate availability. less
2024 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV TEVAdrive
The 2024 Alfa Romeo Tonale PHEV Veloce is presented as a stylish and compelling plug-in hybrid SUV alternative in a market with few direct competitors... more in its price bracket. The reviewer highlights its "sexy" Italian design, which garners significant positive attention, and its strong performance figures, achieving 0-100 km/h in 6 seconds with 280 horsepower. The interior features a blend of traditional Alfa Romeo design with a new digital dashboard, though rear passenger space and headroom are noted as tight compared to rivals like the Audi Q4 e-tron. The reviewer praises the physical climate controls and the large, distinctive paddle shifters, but cautions they can be overly sensitive. Real-world electric range was disappointing, achieving only around 45-50 km even in mild conditions, falling short of expectations. Fuel consumption on the highway with a depleted battery is estimated at 10-11 L/100km. While mechanically identical to the Dodge Hornet RT, the Tonale's superior aesthetics are deemed worth the slightly higher price for those seeking a luxury European PHEV SUV. less
2024 BMW i4 Xdrive 40 vs Audi Q4 Etron 50 Comparison Review Part 1
This comparison review pits the 2024 BMW i4 xDrive40 against the Audi Q4 e-tron 50, highlighting their key differences for potential buyers. The BMW i... more4 xDrive40 is praised for its superior performance, offering nearly 400 horsepower and a quicker 0-60 time (4.5 seconds) compared to the Audi's 300 horsepower. Its aerodynamic design and larger net battery (81 kWh vs. 77 kWh) also contribute to a longer estimated range of 450 km versus the Audi's 415 km. However, the i4's practicality is a significant drawback, with cramped rear legroom and headroom, making it less suitable for taller passengers or families. The trunk space is also noted as being less practical than the Q4's. The Audi Q4 e-tron 50, while less powerful and with a slightly shorter range, excels in practicality. It offers a higher driving position, significantly more rear passenger space, and a larger, more usable trunk. The reviewer notes that the Audi was chosen by their family primarily due to a better overall deal and its superior practicality, despite the BMW's performance advantage. Both vehicles offer similar real-world efficiency, with the BMW showing a slight edge in hypermiling tests (18.5 kWh/100km vs. 17.8 kWh/100km for the Audi), though the Audi's test may have been slightly skewed by traffic conditions. Ultimately, the choice hinges on prioritizing sporty performance and range (BMW) versus practicality and value (Audi). less
2024 BMW X5 50e PHEV vs Mercedes GLE450e Part 1
The 2024 BMW X5 50e PHEV is presented as a potent competitor in the plug-in hybrid SUV segment, directly compared against the Mercedes GLE 450e. The r... moreeviewer highlights the BMW's superior performance, boasting a combined 481 horsepower from its six-cylinder engine and electric motor, significantly outperforming the GLE's four-cylinder setup. Acceleration is noted as a key advantage for the X5. Interior comfort and space are praised, with particular emphasis on the rear climate controls and the unique backlit sunroof offering a 'starry night' effect. However, the reviewer expresses significant dissatisfaction with the heavy reliance on the touchscreen for essential functions like climate control, lamenting the loss of physical buttons. The wireless charger is also criticized for its poor charging performance. While the X5 achieves an impressive 87 km of electric range (exceeding its rated 64 km), it falls short of the GLE's 90+ km. A notable drawback is the lack of fast-charging capability, a feature available on the Mercedes and Range Rover Sport, making the BMW less ideal for those prioritizing rapid charging. less