Auto Buyers Guide, formerly Alex on Autos, is a specialized automotive content distributor dedicated to providing consumers with comprehensive and detailed reviews of new vehicles. Since its inception in 2006, the channel has focused on delivering objective, in-depth analysis of cars, trucks, SUVs, and EVs, covering critical aspects such as interior features, trim levels, pricing, and direct comparisons with segment competitors. The content prioritizes factual information and practical insights over entertainment-driven antics, aiming to equip shoppers with the knowledge needed for informed purchasing decisions.
The distributor's approach is characterized by a commitment to the "nitty-gritty details" often overlooked by other automotive channels. By meticulously examining what potential buyers need to know, Auto Buyers Guide establishes itself as a trusted resource for navigating the complexities of the modern automotive market. Their extensive library includes detailed reviews and comparisons of popular models, ensuring viewers receive thorough guidance on the latest automotive offerings.
The distributor's approach is characterized by a commitment to the "nitty-gritty details" often overlooked by other automotive channels. By meticulously examining what potential buyers need to know, Auto Buyers Guide establishes itself as a trusted resource for navigating the complexities of the modern automotive market. Their extensive library includes detailed reviews and comparisons of popular models, ensuring viewers receive thorough guidance on the latest automotive offerings.
2014 / 2015 / 2016 BMW iDrive Touch Infotainment Review (with Finger Writing Recognition)
This video provides an in-depth review of BMW's 2014 iDrive infotainment system, highlighting its strengths and user-friendliness. The reviewer praises the system's intuitive interface, fluid graphics, and the addition of innovative features like finger writing recognition on the iDrive controlle...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 489 total titles. Page 15 of 21.
The Best RX Is The Most Conflicted | 2021 Lexus RX 450h L
The 2021 Lexus RX 450h L is presented as a compelling, albeit conflicted, option in the luxury SUV segment. The reviewer highlights its exceptional ri... morede quality and class-leading cabin quietness, earning A+ ratings for both. The hybrid powertrain is praised for its smooth operation and impressive fuel economy, also receiving an A+ for real-world efficiency, averaging 29.2 MPG. However, the vehicle's primary drawback lies in its compromised third-row seating, described as "teeny tiny" and suitable only for emergencies or small children/pets. While the "L" version offers increased cargo space over the standard RX, it's still modest behind the third row. Performance is deemed adequate but not sporty, with handling receiving a C+ due to noticeable body roll. The reviewer ultimately recommends the RX 450h L for its comfort, quietness, and reliability, positioning it as a sensible, value-oriented choice against more performance-focused European rivals, though it lacks the all-electric range of plug-in competitors. less
Forget The Navigator | 2020 Aviator Plug In Hybrid
The 2020 Lincoln Aviator Plug-In Hybrid is presented as a compelling American luxury alternative to European rivals like the BMW X5 and Mercedes-Benz ... moreGLE. The reviewer highlights its strong rear-wheel-drive dynamics, spacious and refined interior with excellent craftsmanship, and a good amount of standard power and features. The standard 3.0L twin-turbo V6 engine is praised, but the reviewer strongly advises against the plug-in hybrid variant. While the hybrid offers impressive horsepower and torque figures (494 hp, 630 lb-ft), it comes with a significant weight penalty (around 900 lbs more) that negatively impacts handling and drivetrain smoothness compared to the non-hybrid model. The real-world electric range was disappointing, averaging 15-16 miles instead of the theoretical 21. The reviewer found the hybrid system less smooth than competitors like the Volvo XC90 T8 and noted that the non-hybrid Aviator offers a better balance of performance and driving dynamics for its price. Key criticisms include a sluggish infotainment system, the adaptive air suspension feeling too soft and ponderous, and the lack of power-folding third-row seats when the hatch is closed. Despite these drawbacks, the non-hybrid Aviator is recommended for its value, interior quality, and competitive driving dynamics against its American and European rivals. less
Everything We Know About The New Hummer EV Truck
The GMC Hummer EV is presented as a groundbreaking electric truck, boasting immense power with a claimed 1,000 horsepower and 11,500 lb-ft of theoreti... morecal torque. The reviewer highlights its extreme off-road capabilities, including 35-inch standard tires, up to 15.9 inches of ground clearance, and a unique 'crab walk' feature enabled by four-wheel steering. A significant point of discussion is the massive 200 kWh battery pack, expected to offer up to 350 miles of range, though efficiency is anticipated to be low due to its size and weight. The charging system is noted for its ability to switch between 400V and 800V modes for up to 350 kW DC fast charging, potentially adding 100 miles of range in 10 minutes. However, the reviewer cautions that the advertised performance figures, particularly torque, are theoretical and potentially misleading. Key unknowns include exact curb weight, payload, towing capacity, and detailed motor ratings. Pricing starts high, with the "Edition 1" launching at $112,595. less
The Bite Sized EV | 2021 Mini Cooper SE
The 2021 Mini Cooper SE is presented as a unique proposition in the EV market, prioritizing driving fun and style over outright range. The reviewer pr... moreaises its peppy acceleration, agile handling, and engaging driving dynamics, likening it to a go-kart experience. The standard heat pump is highlighted as a significant advantage for consistent cabin heating and predictable range in colder weather. Its sub-$30,000 starting price, especially after incentives, makes it one of the most affordable EVs available. However, the limited 110-mile EPA range is a major drawback for those needing more, and the ride quality is noted as firm, transmitting road imperfections into the cabin. The reviewer also points out the lack of advanced driver-assistance systems like adaptive cruise control. While not as practical as competitors like the Hyundai Ioniq Electric or Nissan Leaf, the Mini Cooper SE is recommended for buyers seeking a stylish, fun, and economical second car for commuting, rather than a primary vehicle for long-distance travel. less
The Crossover With A Plug | 2020 Kia Niro PHEV
The 2020 Kia Niro PHEV is presented as a pragmatic choice for those seeking efficiency and practicality, positioned as a "middle child" betw... moreeen the hybrid and full EV variants. The reviewer highlights its crossover-like styling despite being technically a hatchback, offering a comfortable, upright driving position and ample interior space, particularly for rear passengers, surpassing many competitors. Key advantages include a practical cargo area, a comfortable ride, and a traditional car-like driving feel thanks to its six-speed dual-clutch transmission. The reviewer notes that while its 26 miles of electric range is sufficient for average commutes, its fuel economy (46 mpg combined) and acceleration (9.5 seconds 0-60) are not class-leading, with the Prius Prime and Hyundai Ioniq offering superior efficiency and the Honda Clarity Plug-in offering better performance. The reviewer also points out the unusual regenerative braking feel and the lack of adaptive cruise control as standard features. Despite its strengths, the reviewer ultimately favors the Hyundai Ioniq due to its lower price point and comparable performance and efficiency, though acknowledges the Niro's more appealing aesthetics. less
The Hybrid That Tows | 2021 Ford Explorer Hybrid
The 2021 Ford Explorer Hybrid is presented as a unique offering in the segment, prioritizing towing capability over maximum fuel efficiency, a departu... morere from competitors like the Toyota Highlander Hybrid. While it boasts a robust 5,000-pound towing capacity and a refined rear-wheel-drive platform offering engaging driving dynamics, its hybrid system's fuel economy falls short of expectations, often failing to meet EPA estimates and even trailing the non-hybrid 2.3L turbo Explorer in real-world scenarios. The reviewer highlights the spacious interior, comfortable ride, and quiet cabin as positives, but notes compromises in third-row comfort and cargo space compared to previous generations. Ultimately, the high price point of the hybrid, coupled with its underwhelming fuel savings, leads the reviewer to question its value proposition, suggesting the 2.3L turbo Explorer or the Highlander Hybrid as more compelling alternatives depending on the buyer's priorities. less
Hybrid vs V8 Towing Test: Which Is More Efficient?
In a head-to-head towing test, the Ford Explorer Hybrid and the Dodge Durango V8 delivered surprisingly similar real-world fuel economy figures. The E... morexplorer Hybrid, despite its advanced powertrain, achieved 15.3 MPG, while the Durango V8 managed 15.6 MPG over a challenging mountain loop. While the Durango offers a higher tow rating and feels more robust when pulling a load, the Explorer Hybrid provides a smoother, more European driving experience and better efficiency in city driving or downhill coasting due to its electric-only mode and regenerative braking. The reviewer found it difficult to justify the hybrid's premium over the standard EcoBoost Explorer for towing purposes, questioning Ford's hybrid strategy compared to Toyota's offerings. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the buyer's primary use case: heavier towing favors the Durango, while mixed driving with a focus on city efficiency might lean towards the Explorer Hybrid, though its towing MPG advantage is minimal. less
Hyundai Nexo Long Term Update: One Year Later
This video provides a one-year long-term update on the Hyundai Nexo, focusing on its performance and practicality after extended use. The reviewer hig... morehlights the vehicle's quiet operation and comfortable ride, characteristic of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. However, the transcript is heavily laden with filler content and unrelated phrases, making it difficult to extract specific pros and cons or concrete real-world range figures. The overall impression is that the Nexo offers a unique, albeit niche, ownership experience, but the lack of clear, detailed feedback in the transcript prevents a definitive assessment of its long-term viability or any significant drawbacks encountered. less
Is This Finally The Model 3 Fighter? 2021 Polestar 2 First Drive
The Polestar 2 is presented as a compelling alternative to the Tesla Model 3, offering a blend of performance, technology, and build quality. The revi... moreewer highlights its strong acceleration (0-60 mph in 4.4 seconds), engaging handling with a rear-wheel-drive bias, and a more premium interior feel compared to the Model 3, particularly in terms of fit and finish. The Google-based Android Automotive OS infotainment system is praised for its speed and integration, though the lack of native Waze is noted. Positives include the standard features like the glass roof and Harman Kardon audio, and the potential for significant price reduction with tax credits. However, the reviewer points out a firmer ride, especially with the Performance Pack, and a slightly lower real-world range (205 miles at 70 mph) compared to the Model 3 Performance (234 miles). The car's weight (4,600 lbs) is also a factor. Ultimately, the reviewer expresses a strong preference for the Polestar 2 over the Model 3 due to its unique styling and superior build quality, despite its higher starting price before incentives. less
The Volvo That Changed The Game | 2020 Volvo XC90 T8
The 2020 Volvo XC90 T8 is presented as the vehicle that spearheaded Volvo's modern renaissance, introducing a new design language and world-class... more interiors. The reviewer highlights its strong exterior and interior design, emphasizing elegance and luxury over mere sensibility. The plug-in hybrid T8 powertrain is praised for its 400 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque, offering a performance-oriented option within Volvo's lineup. The reviewer notes the advanced e-all-wheel-drive system, which utilizes a rear electric motor for extended periods, and a larger battery pack (11.6 kWh) contributing to its capabilities. Positives include a comfortable ride, a solid and confident feel in corners, and impressive fuel economy (27.6 MPG average without charging). However, criticisms include the lack of standard advanced safety features on all models, fixed headrests, and a less configurable instrument cluster compared to some German rivals. The third-row space is adequate but not class-leading, and the materials in the rear are noted as being less premium than in the front. Despite these points, the XC90 T8 is considered a strong contender for its style, value, performance, and safety, especially when factoring in potential tax credits. less
Soldiering On For Another Year | 2020 Chevrolet Bolt
The 2020 Chevrolet Bolt is presented as a capable, albeit aging, electric vehicle facing stiff competition and the loss of federal tax credits. While ... moreit offers a respectable 259 miles of EPA-estimated range (with a real-world test achieving 247 miles), its value proposition is significantly challenged by newer, more modern EVs. The reviewer highlights the Bolt's peppy acceleration and well-controlled handling due to its low center of gravity, but criticizes the ride quality as merely average (C+) and the interior for its heavy use of hard plastics and uncomfortable front seats lacking lumbar support. The infotainment system is noted as EV-focused and informative, but the overall interior electronics feel dated compared to rivals. The lack of a heat pump for cabin heating is a significant drawback in colder climates, impacting efficiency. Despite its engineering strengths, particularly in battery thermal management, the Bolt's high price point (especially after losing tax credits) and dated design make it a difficult recommendation against compelling alternatives like the Tesla Model 3, Hyundai Kona EV, Kia Niro EV, and even the more affordable Mini Cooper SE for city commuting. less
Sorry Honda, I Changed My Mind | RAV4 Hybrid vs CR-V Hybrid
The comparison between the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and the Honda CR-V Hybrid highlights key differences that might sway potential buyers. While the CR-V Hy... morebrid excels in rear seat room and offers a mechanical AWD system, its real-world fuel economy, particularly on the highway and during hill climbs, falls short of the RAV4 Hybrid. The reviewer also notes the CR-V's older infotainment system and lack of a spare tire as significant drawbacks. The RAV4 Hybrid, despite its e-AWD system, demonstrates superior fuel efficiency, especially at higher speeds and under load, and offers the practicality of a spare tire. Although the CR-V provides a more comfortable ride on rough surfaces and a slightly quieter cabin, the RAV4's more engaging driving dynamics and superior powertrain performance, particularly in acceleration and hill climbing, lead the reviewer to favor the Toyota, even suggesting a preference for the upcoming RAV4 Prime. less
The Honda Hybrid You've Been Asking For | 2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid
The 2020 Honda CR-V Hybrid enters the competitive crossover segment with a focus on practicality and a unique mechanical all-wheel-drive system. While... more it offers excellent rear-seat legroom, comfortable front seats, and a polished ride on rougher surfaces, its primary drawback is disappointing real-world fuel economy, particularly in hill-climbing and high-speed driving scenarios, falling short of competitors like the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid and even the non-hybrid CR-V in demanding conditions. The CR-V Hybrid's powertrain, a series-parallel system, prioritizes electric drive at lower speeds but can be noisy and less efficient when the engine must work harder. Positives include standard Honda Sensing safety features, a well-designed interior with imitation wood trim, and a more capable AWD system than the RAV4 Hybrid's e-AWD. However, the infotainment system feels dated, cargo space is reduced due to battery placement, and there's no spare tire or tow rating. Ultimately, while the CR-V Hybrid offers strong points in comfort and AWD capability, its fuel economy shortcomings make the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid a more compelling choice for those prioritizing efficiency. less
The Best X3? | 2020 BMW X3 Plug In Hybrid
The 2020 BMW X3 xDrive30e is presented as a compelling option in the luxury plug-in hybrid SUV segment, particularly for its value proposition. The re... moreviewer highlights that after federal tax credits, it becomes the least expensive way to acquire an all-wheel-drive X3, undercutting even the non-hybrid xDrive30i. The hybrid system, producing a combined 288 horsepower, offers brisk acceleration (0-60 mph in 5.9 seconds) and a smooth transition between electric and gasoline power, a significant improvement over previous BMW hybrid generations. While the electric range is modest at 18-20 miles, the reviewer emphasizes that for most commuters, this is sufficient to cover daily travel, significantly reducing fuel consumption. Positives include excellent driving dynamics, a hallmark of BMW, with the rearward battery placement enhancing steering feel. However, the reviewer notes that the hybrid system results in slightly lower fuel economy (24 mpg combined) than the non-hybrid X3 once the battery is depleted, and cargo space is marginally reduced. Compared to competitors like the Volvo XC60 T8, the X3 offers a more engaging driving experience and better value, despite the Volvo boasting superior performance and fuel economy. less
What's It Like To Drive? 2021 RAV4 Prime
The 2021 Toyota RAV4 Prime offers a compelling blend of performance and efficiency, though it doesn't quite redefine the sporty crossover segment... more. While its 5.7-second 0-60 mph time is impressive, surpassing many competitors including some luxury plug-in hybrids, the added weight of the larger 18.1 kWh battery pack impacts handling and braking distances. The reviewer notes a "heavier feel" and "wallowing" in corners compared to the standard hybrid or sportier rivals like the Mazda CX-5. However, the RAV4 Prime excels in its EV range, delivering a real-world 35 miles, and its hybrid system provides a peppy, EV-like acceleration with a polished delivery. Ride quality receives an 'A' grade, and cabin noise is slightly improved over previous models. Despite not being the sportiest option, it's a comfortable, efficient family hauler that delivers strong acceleration and excellent EV range. less
The Plug-In You've Been Waiting For | 2021 RAV4 Prime Review Part 1
This review of the 2021 Toyota RAV4 Prime highlights its significant departure from previous hybrid models, emphasizing performance over pure efficien... morecy. The reviewer notes its class-leading 42 miles of EV range and a potent 302 horsepower, enabling a quick 5.7-second 0-60 mph sprint. While the transcript is heavily distorted and difficult to parse for specific pros and cons, it generally conveys a positive impression of the vehicle's capabilities and its position as a compelling plug-in hybrid option. The review touches upon various aspects including exterior, safety, the PHEV system, interior space, and cargo capacity, suggesting a comprehensive overview. The Prime trim is presented as a powerful and versatile SUV, offering substantial electric range alongside strong performance metrics. less
Marching To A Different Drummer | 2020 Volvo S60
The 2020 Volvo S60 T8 is presented as a refreshing alternative to the typical German luxury sedan, prioritizing safety, comfort, luxury, and efficienc... morey. The reviewer highlights its potent 400-horsepower plug-in hybrid system, which delivers impressive acceleration (0-60 in 4.4 seconds) and a respectable 20+ miles of real-world electric range, while still achieving 31 mpg combined after the battery is depleted. The interior is praised for its comfort features, including optional massage seats, and the significantly improved rear legroom compared to previous generations. However, the T8 model's bulky center console due to battery placement and reduced trunk space (11.6 cubic feet) are noted drawbacks. While handling is competent, the vehicle's 4,500-pound curb weight, attributed to the battery pack, means it doesn't offer the same dynamic agility as lighter, rear-wheel-drive competitors like the BMW 3-Series or Mercedes-Benz C-Class. The reviewer ultimately leans towards the S60 T8 for its unique blend of performance, efficiency, and distinct character, despite acknowledging the strong offerings from rivals. less
Why Didn't They Build This First? Tesla Model Y: The One You've Waited For
The Tesla Model Y is presented as the crossover version of the Model 3, designed to compete directly with luxury compact SUVs like the BMW X3 and Audi... more Q5. The reviewer highlights its efficient, liftback-like profile, which prioritizes aerodynamics over traditional boxy SUV styling, impacting rearward visibility. Performance figures are noted, with the dual-motor AWD version achieving 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds and a quoted range of 316 miles. However, real-world testing suggests a more conservative range of around 225 miles, particularly in varied driving conditions and terrain. The interior shares many similarities with the Model 3, featuring comfortable seats but lacking some premium adjustability and features like seat massage or ventilation. Rear headroom is improved over the Model 3, though hip room is slightly reduced. The reviewer praises the minimalist interior and large touchscreen but criticizes the lack of Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and the indirect control of air vents. While the Model Y offers a lower center of gravity and good grip, the ride quality is described as firm, especially with optional 20-inch wheels, and the steering is deemed overly twitchy. The vehicle's towing capacity is noted, but with a significant range penalty. Priced competitively, especially against other full EVs like the Jaguar I-Pace and Audi e-tron, the Model Y's main rivals are identified as the upcoming Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Volvo XC60 T8 plug-in hybrid. less
Tesla: What They Get Right & What They Get Wrong
The reviewer highlights Tesla's undeniable benchmark status in the EV market, praising their innovative approach and the excellent, dealer-free p... moreurchase experience. The Model Y is noted for its comfortable seats, strong performance (even in non-performance trims), and a clean, minimalist interior design. The reviewer also commends Tesla's pioneering work in establishing a robust charging network and their focus on software and infotainment innovation, particularly the integrated navigation with charging stops. However, significant criticisms are leveled at build quality and panel gaps, a perceived "cult of Tesla" mentality, and a lack of practicality in the Model Y's "egg shape" design which compromises interior volume. The non-standard charging port is a major point of contention, hindering interoperability. The reviewer also notes the absence of features common in luxury vehicles, such as Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, and the lack of a truly performance-oriented factory package beyond straight-line acceleration. Finally, the absence of a blended braking system, which wastes regenerative energy, is a notable technological oversight. less
Does Adding A Plug Make This The Best Compact Car? 2020 Hyundai Ioniq PHEV
The 2020 Hyundai Ioniq PHEV is presented as a pragmatic and highly fuel-efficient alternative in a market dominated by full EVs. The reviewer highligh... morets its refreshed exterior and interior, including a new 10.25-inch infotainment screen. Key advantages noted are its superior handling and ride quality compared to the Toyota Prius Prime, a more traditional driving feel thanks to its dual-clutch transmission, and a larger cargo area. The reviewer also praises its attractive styling and comfortable seats. However, the Ioniq PHEV's main drawbacks include its engine starting to heat the cabin in cold weather (unlike the Prius Prime), and a slightly less efficient hybrid system and EV mode power compared to its main competitor. Real-world fuel economy averaged just over 53 MPG when driven as a hybrid without charging, with an official EV range of nearly 30 miles. While not as efficient as the Prius Prime, the Ioniq PHEV offers a more engaging driving experience and better aesthetics for those willing to trade a small amount of efficiency. less
High Efficiency Family Hauling - The 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid Is All About Economy
The 2020 Toyota Highlander Hybrid significantly prioritizes fuel economy over performance, a notable shift from its predecessor. While it sacrifices s... moreome power, resulting in a 0-60 time of 8.2 seconds, it achieves up to 36 MPG combined, with real-world testing showing averages around 35.1 MPG, and potentially higher (38-39 MPG) with gentle driving. The reviewer highlights the elegant styling, standard safety features, and a comfortable, quiet cabin ideal for highway journeys. However, criticisms include a lack of lumbar support adjustability on the passenger seat, a slightly cramped third row, and a less intuitive infotainment system compared to competitors. Despite these drawbacks and a higher price point than some rivals, the Highlander Hybrid's substantial fuel savings make it a compelling choice for budget-conscious families, even if it doesn't match the interior space of larger competitors like the Kia Telluride. less
Wall Street vs Main Street Hybrid Edition - Lexus NX vs Toyota RAV4
This comparison pits the Lexus NX Hybrid against the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, evaluating whether the premium "Wall Street" experience justifies t... morehe higher cost over the mainstream "Main Street" option. The reviewer highlights that despite similar sizes, the NX is based on the previous generation RAV4 platform and uses an older hybrid system, resulting in less power (219 hp vs. 194 hp) and significantly worse fuel economy (41.5 mpg vs. 32.1 mpg in testing). While the NX offers a more luxurious interior with better materials, attention to detail, and quieter cabin, the RAV4 boasts superior performance, handling, a more modern platform, and a much larger, more practical cargo area. The reviewer notes the NX's older design is apparent in its less refined ride and infotainment system (touchpad). Ultimately, the reviewer leans towards the RAV4 Hybrid Limited, citing its better performance, handling, practicality, and superior fuel efficiency, even though the NX offers a longer warranty and more premium features like LED fog lights and extra proximity sensors. The price difference is approximately $2,500, with the reviewer suggesting the RAV4's core advantages outweigh the NX's luxury accoutrements for most buyers. less
RAV4 Hybrid Towing Torture Test - Will It Survive The Climb?
This video presents a comprehensive towing "torture test" of the 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, pushing it beyond its rated capacity with 2,000 po... moreunds of trailer weight (250 lbs over the 1,750 lb limit) and ascending over 7,000 feet in elevation. The reviewer highlights the vehicle's impressive performance, noting no overheating issues with the motors, battery, or inverter, even under significant load and steep grades. Real-world fuel economy averaged 17 MPG for the entire 442-mile round trip, a figure deemed "stellar" given the conditions and aerodynamic drag. The reviewer praises the hybrid system's ability to provide engine braking on descents and its overall capability in maintaining speed and even passing other vehicles uphill. While acknowledging the lower MPG compared to non-towing scenarios, the test concludes that the RAV4 Hybrid is a capable tow vehicle, exceeding expectations and demonstrating robust thermal management. less
Silky Smooth Inline-6s Are All The Rage | 2020 Range Rover Sport
This video explores the resurgence of inline-6 engines, focusing on the 2020 Range Rover Sport's implementation. The reviewer highlights the inhe... morerent smoothness and balance of the inline-6 configuration, contrasting it with the perceived outdatedness of V6 engines. The JLR 6-cylinder engine is noted as a mild hybrid, suggesting a blend of performance and efficiency. While the transcript is minimal, the title and description emphasize the positive attributes of this engine layout in the context of the Range Rover Sport, positioning it as a desirable choice for buyers seeking refinement. less