Edmunds Cars is a premier online destination for automotive enthusiasts and car buyers seeking expert insights and the latest industry news. This distributor specializes in providing comprehensive reviews, in-depth comparisons, and crucial advice on purchasing, selling, financing, and maintaining vehicles. Their content covers a wide spectrum of automotive trends, from new model releases and electric vehicle advancements to performance tests and award-winning selections.
Leveraging a team of dedicated automotive experts, Edmunds Cars aims to simplify the car-shopping process by delivering unbiased information and practical guidance. Whether you're interested in the newest sedans, robust SUVs, or cutting-edge EVs, Edmunds Cars offers valuable resources to help consumers make informed decisions in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.
Leveraging a team of dedicated automotive experts, Edmunds Cars aims to simplify the car-shopping process by delivering unbiased information and practical guidance. Whether you're interested in the newest sedans, robust SUVs, or cutting-edge EVs, Edmunds Cars offers valuable resources to help consumers make informed decisions in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.
Drag Race! Tesla Model S Plaid vs. Suzuki Hayabusa vs. Kawasaki ZX-14R
This video pits the 2021 Tesla Model S Plaid against two formidable superbikes: the Suzuki Hayabusa and the Kawasaki ZX-14R, in a series of drag and roll races. The Model S Plaid, with its 1,020 horsepower and sub-9-second quarter-mile capability, proved to be an astonishingly quick and drama-fre...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 79 total titles. Page 1 of 4.
We Test Everything: These Are Our Favorite Off-Road Moments
This Edmunds video compilation showcases a variety of off-road vehicle tests, highlighting surprising capabilities and notable disappointments. The Me... morercedes G-Class EV impressed by conquering a steep hill climb with ease, outperforming the Hummer EV despite having less aggressive tires and no off-road specific setup. The Ford Bronco also demonstrated strong performance, particularly in handling rough terrain and maintaining composure over bumps, surpassing the Jeep Wrangler in isolation and articulation. Pickup trucks like the F-150 Tremor, Ram 1500 Rebel, and Silverado Trail Boss were tested on a challenging hill climb, with the F-150 Tremor emerging as the most capable and comfortable. The video also touches on high-speed off-roading with the Lamborghini Huracan Sterrato and Ford Ranger Raptor, and the extreme power of the Raptor R. However, not all vehicles succeeded; the Rivian R1T struggled on a hill climb where a Tacoma TRD Pro excelled, and the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally was criticized for its limited ground clearance and poor approach/breakover angles, making it unsuitable for anything beyond light trails. The G-Wagen's extreme off-road test through pipes was a nerve-wracking display of precision driving and expensive caution. less
Track Tested: Lamborghini Revuelto | 0-60, Quarter Mile, Handling, Braking & More
Edmunds puts the Lamborghini Revuelto, the brand's most powerful production car, through its paces at the test track. The Revuelto, a plug-in hyb... morerid V12 supercar, achieves a blistering 0-60 mph in 2.6 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 10.2 seconds at over 140 mph, making it the quickest gas-powered car Edmunds has ever tested in the quarter-mile. However, the review highlights that despite its impressive acceleration, the Revuelto falls short in braking, stopping from 60 mph in 105 feet, and its lateral grip on the skidpad, while good, doesn't match top-tier competitors. The reviewer attributes some of these shortcomings, particularly the desire for more grip and confidence at the limit, to the car's tires. Despite these points, the Revuelto is praised for its livability, comfortable interior, advanced technology, and the thrilling, albeit sometimes squirrely, driving experience that still feels distinctly like a mid-engine Lamborghini. less
Nissan Leaf vs. Chevy Equinox EV: Battle of the Affordable Electric SUVs
The Edmunds review pits the Nissan Leaf against the Chevrolet Equinox EV, ultimately favoring the Equinox as the more well-rounded affordable electric... more SUV. While the Leaf is praised for its comfortable "zero gravity" seats, ample rear passenger space, and impressive range test results (especially the S+ trim), it falls short in ride quality, wind noise, and the need to re-initiate one-pedal driving. The Equinox EV, despite its less comfortable seats and a higher starting price, is lauded for its superior ride quality, quieter cabin, more versatile interior space, and the availability of Super Cruise. Although the Leaf's loaded Platinum Plus trim achieved a respectable 310 miles in Edmunds' range test, the Equinox EV managed an even more impressive 356 miles. The review highlights the Equinox EV as the better choice for those prioritizing comfort, space, and a more refined driving experience, even with its higher cost. less
We Tested Ten SUVs, Which One's the Best?
Edmunds conducted a comprehensive test of ten compact SUVs, evaluating them on comfort, cargo, tech, driving dynamics, and fuel economy to determine t... morehe best and worst. The Chevrolet Equinox was ranked last due to its sluggish performance, poor visibility, and limited practicality, despite decent tech features. The Subaru Forester Hybrid offered excellent visibility and easy access but suffered from a dated and unresponsive infotainment system and poor small item storage. The Ford Bronco Sport excelled in off-road capability and offered unique features like a pop-up rear window, but was criticized for its high price, inefficiency, and cramped rear seating. The Nissan Rogue provided clever storage and good fuel economy for a gas vehicle, but its infotainment system was laggy and outdated, and its powertrain felt sluggish. The Mazda CX-50 impressed with its upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, but had limited cargo space, especially in the hybrid version, and its tech interface relied heavily on a scroll knob. The Honda CR-V was praised for its refined ride quality, spacious rear seat, and quality touchpoints, but lacked some expected features and its best infotainment was limited to the top trim. The Volkswagen Tiguan was noted for its luxury feel, supportive seats, and quiet cabin, but lacked a hybrid option, had below-average fuel economy, and relied solely on touchscreen controls. The Toyota RAV4 showed significant improvements with a new infotainment system, standard digital display, and integrated dashcam, offering good performance and efficiency, though its rear seat and front seat comfort were noted as drawbacks. The Kia Sportage Hybrid tied for the top spot with the Hyundai Tucson, offering comfortable seats, ample storage, a great cargo area, and excellent value, but its infotainment controls were cumbersome and fuel economy was only average for a hybrid. Ultimately, the Hyundai Tucson Hybrid was crowned the winner for its well-rounded performance, comfortable interior, ample storage, and excellent driving dynamics, making it the most recommendable compact SUV in the test. less
Hybrid 3-Row SUV Battle: Hyundai Palisade vs. Toyota Grand Highlander
The Hyundai Palisade Hybrid emerges as the victor in this comparison against the Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid, primarily due to its superior value a... morend a more premium, luxurious feel. While the Grand Highlander excels in passenger and cargo space, and offers a potent "Max" powertrain option, the Palisade impresses with its upscale interior design, extensive features, and a more refined driving experience, especially with the hybrid powertrain that addresses the previous gas version's shortcomings. The Palisade's hybrid system provides a noticeable power boost and better fuel efficiency than its gas counterpart, achieving around 26 MPG in real-world testing, slightly better than the Grand Highlander's approximately 24 MPG. Although the Grand Highlander offers more raw cargo volume, the Palisade's cargo area is more feature-rich. The reviewer highlights the Palisade's exceptional interior quality, advanced technology like the integrated dash cam and high-wattage USB ports, and superior warranty coverage as key advantages. Despite the Grand Highlander's strengths, the Palisade's overall execution, particularly its "X-factor" and value proposition, makes it the recommended choice for most buyers. less
New Toyota RAV4 vs. Honda CR-V Hybrid vs. Kia Sportage Hybrid | Best Hybrid SUV
The 2026 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid marks a significant improvement over its predecessor, particularly in technology and interior design. The reviewer highlig... morehts its exceptional small-item storage, including a unique dual-opening center console and standard integrated dash cam. While the new infotainment system and digital cluster with map mirroring are praised, the reviewer notes that some interior plastics feel less premium compared to rivals, especially in this mid-grade XLE trim. Driving dynamics are described as competent and smooth, with a seamless blend of regenerative and physical braking, though refinement is hampered by noticeable road and engine noise, and less comfortable seats than competitors. Despite its efficiency advantage and standard tech features, the RAV4 falls short of being the top pick due to a lack of overall refinement and comfort compared to the Honda CR-V Hybrid and Kia Sportage Hybrid. The reviewer suggests the XLE trim offers the best value within the RAV4 lineup. less
Lucid Gravity vs. Rivian R1S: Battle of the Upstart Electric SUVs
The Lucid Gravity Grand Touring and Rivian R1S are pitted against each other in a battle of American EV startups. The Lucid Gravity impresses with its... more phenomenal driving dynamics, quiet cabin, and excellent ride comfort, feeling more like a car than an SUV. Its powertrain is potent, and handling is a standout feature, even drawing comparisons to the Porsche 911. However, the Gravity is significantly hampered by persistent build quality issues, including inconsistent panel gaps, cheap-feeling interior trim, and problematic touch controls. The reviewer notes that despite its driving prowess, the Gravity does not feel like a finished product and requires more polish. The Rivian R1S, in contrast, is presented as a mature and well-built vehicle. It offers solid build quality, impressive on-road and off-road capability, and clever packaging. While its driving dynamics and ride comfort don't quite match the Gravity's, the R1S is deemed the more complete package for the present. The R1S also excels in technology and cargo features, including a built-in air compressor and a removable Bluetooth speaker. Despite both vehicles falling short of their EPA range estimates in Edmunds' real-world test (Gravity: 400 miles, R1S: 361 miles), the Gravity showed superior efficiency and faster charging. Ultimately, the Rivian R1S is declared the winner due to its superior build quality, refined interior, and overall feeling of being a finished product, making it the choice for immediate purchase, though the Gravity's potential is acknowledged. less
Everything You Need to Know About the Used Car Market in 2025
This video provides a comprehensive overview of the current used car market in 2025, highlighting persistent high prices driven by the lingering effec... morets of the microchip shortage and reduced new car sales during the COVID-19 pandemic. While average used car prices remain above $30,000, the discussion emphasizes that buyers are often getting more features and newer technology compared to pre-COVID purchases. The segment on leasing points out its resurgence in the EV market due to tax credits and the rapid pace of technological advancement, making shorter ownership cycles appealing. Tariffs are noted as a factor that automakers are currently absorbing, but potential future price increases or feature reductions are anticipated. The review delves into new car pricing, with average transaction prices nearing $50,000, though this is influenced by a wide range of vehicles. Financing costs are a significant concern, with high interest rates on used car loans adding substantially to the overall cost. A key takeaway is that while EVs generally depreciate faster, they can present good value in the used market, especially when compared to new EV leases. The video also lists top-performing used vehicles in terms of value retention (Porsche 911, Ford Maverick, Toyota Tacoma, Honda Civic, Toyota 4Runner) and those that depreciate the most (Kia EV6, BMW 7 Series, Nissan Leaf, Audi e-tron, Mercedes-Benz EQS), with EVs frequently appearing on the latter list. The overarching advice for buyers is to conduct thorough research, compare new and used options, and pay close attention to interest rates and incentives to secure the best deal. less
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Kia EV9: What’s the Best 3-Row Electric SUV?
Edmunds compares the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Kia EV9, two closely related but distinct three-row electric SUVs. While both offer near-luxury interiors, co... moremfortable seating, and impressive tech, the Ioniq 9 edges out the EV9 in several key areas. The Ioniq 9 boasts a slightly larger battery, resulting in a longer range and faster charging, and offers more functional cargo space due to its deeper area and power-folding seats. The reviewer praises the Ioniq 9's comfortable ride, quiet cabin, and user-friendly interior design, particularly the accessible climate controls and flexible storage solutions. However, the EV9 is noted for its more athletic driving dynamics and superior suspension tuning, feeling more settled and less prone to body roll. Minor criticisms for the Ioniq 9 include a slightly floaty suspension and a driver attention monitor placement that can be easily blocked. Ultimately, the Ioniq 9 wins by a narrow margin due to its superior range, comfort, and value, though the reviewer emphasizes that either vehicle is an excellent choice, with personal preference for style being a deciding factor. less
Owning the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid: One-Year Review
After a year and nearly 20,000 miles, the Edmunds team finds the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid Calligraphy to be a stylish, comfortable, and spacious three-... morerow SUV that's surprisingly fun and easy to drive. The interior is praised for its premium feel, comfortable seats, ample storage, and useful tech features like wireless CarPlay and fast wireless charging. The spaciousness, particularly the usable third row, is a significant advantage over competitors. However, the hybrid powertrain falls short of its EPA-estimated fuel economy, consistently delivering lower MPG in real-world testing, which is a notable disappointment. Other minor gripes include overly hot heated seats/steering wheel, a finicky gear shifter, a rear sunroof with poor insulation, and the impracticality of the matte paint finish requiring hand washing. Despite these drawbacks, the Santa Fe's strong value proposition, comfortable ride, and advanced driver aids make it a compelling option, though its depreciation is higher than some rivals. less
Hyundai Santa Fe vs. Toyota Grand Highlander: Which Is the Better Hybrid 3-Row SUV?
The Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid and Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid are both highly capable three-row SUVs, but they cater to different priorities. The San... moreta Fe impresses with its stylish, detail-oriented interior, abundant small item storage, and surprisingly spacious third row, making it a comfortable and appealing choice for families who value design and don't frequently use the rearmost seats. Its driving experience is smooth, though the hybrid powertrain lacks punch for aggressive acceleration and its real-world fuel economy fell short of expectations, averaging 27.5 MPG over 20,000 miles. The Grand Highlander, while less stylish, excels in sheer practicality and space. Its larger dimensions translate to significantly more cargo room and a more accommodating third row, making it ideal for larger families or those with frequent cargo needs. The Hybrid Max powertrain offers strong performance, significantly outperforming the Santa Fe in acceleration. Ride quality is also slightly more composed. However, the Grand Highlander's infotainment subscription model for certain features is a drawback, and its starting price is higher. Ultimately, the Grand Highlander wins on practicality and space, earning an Edmunds rating, but the Santa Fe offers strong value, a more appealing design, and a comfortable experience for those who can utilize its strengths. less
What's the Best Jeep Wrangler Rubicon? Wrangler 392 vs Wrangler 4xe
Edmunds' Emme Hall puts two distinct Jeep Wrangler Rubicon models, the V8-powered 392 and the plug-in hybrid 4xe, to the ultimate test on the Rub... moreicon Trail. Hall finds that while both are highly capable stock off-roaders, their approaches differ significantly. The Wrangler 392, with its 6.4L V8, offers immense power and a surprisingly smooth, manageable driving experience on the trail, despite initial concerns about its horsepower. Its crawl ratio is calculated at 58.1:1, delivering substantial wheel torque. The 4xe, a plug-in hybrid, boasts a combined 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque, with a superior crawl ratio of 77.2:1. However, its throttle sensitivity and prioritization of EV mode at low speeds create a learning curve for smooth driving. Hall notes the 4xe's instant electric torque is beneficial but requires careful modulation. Ultimately, while both vehicles conquer the trail with stock components, the 392 is praised for its ease of use and smooth power delivery. The decision between the two is heavily influenced by price, with the 392 costing significantly more ($102,000) than the 4xe (starting around $63,000). If budget is no concern, the 392 is the preferred choice for its driving dynamics. less
Volvo EX30 vs. Tesla Model Y: Which Electric SUV Is the Better Buy?
The Edmunds review pits the all-new Volvo EX30 against the established Tesla Model Y, highlighting key differences in their approach to the electric S... moreUV segment. While the EX30 impresses with its quick acceleration (the fastest Volvo tested) and a comfortable, quiet ride, it falls short in practical areas. The reviewer criticizes its cramped rear seating, small cargo space, and a software interface that feels unfinished, lacking features like Android Auto and having cumbersome controls. The EX30's real-world range also disappointed, barely meeting its EPA estimate at 256 miles, significantly less than the Model Y's 327 miles. The Model Y, despite being more expensive, is lauded for its superior interior space, larger cargo capacity, more refined software, and better overall comfort, particularly in the rear. Although the Model Y's Full Self-Driving system is noted for its high cost and imperfect execution, its core driving dynamics, comfort, and practicality make it the clear winner in this comparison for value and refinement. The EX30's appeal lies in its unique styling and smaller footprint, but it requires significant software polish to compete effectively. less
Which 3-Row EV Is Best? Volvo EX90 vs. Kia EV9 vs. Volkswagen ID. Buzz
Edmunds compares three highly anticipated 3-row EVs: the Kia EV9, Volvo EX90, and Volkswagen ID. Buzz. The Kia EV9, already a favorite and part of Edm... moreunds' long-term fleet, is praised for its comfortable ride, luxurious interior for its price point, user-friendly technology, and excellent value, making it the best all-around choice for most buyers. The Volvo EX90 impresses with its quiet cabin and premium materials, but is significantly hampered by unreliable software, a frustrating touchscreen interface, and a cramped third row, making it difficult to recommend despite its luxury aspirations. The Volkswagen ID. Buzz stands out for its immense interior space and unique, retro styling, offering a van-like experience. However, it suffers from a firm ride, a noisy cabin, less premium interior materials compared to the others, and critically, the shortest real-world range of the group, along with ergonomic issues like poor small item storage and a lack of second-row cup holders. While the EX90 and ID. Buzz have potential, the EV9's well-rounded nature and lack of significant drawbacks solidify its position as the top pick. less
Which Is the Best Hybrid SUV? Honda CR-V Hybrid vs. Subaru Forester Hybrid
The 2025 Subaru Forester Hybrid is introduced as the brand's first-ever hybrid SUV, aiming to improve upon the gas model's efficiency and dr... moreiving dynamics. While it succeeds in offering a quieter, smoother ride and better acceleration off the line thanks to its hybrid powertrain and improved suspension, it retains the gas model's subpar interior materials and a laggy, outdated infotainment system. The Forester Hybrid boasts standard AWD, excellent visibility, and a spacious interior, but falls short in interior storage and the user experience of its tech. In contrast, the Honda CR-V Hybrid, despite being a few years older, offers a more refined and functional interior with superior materials and a responsive infotainment system. While the CR-V Hybrid is slightly less efficient and has a less engaging AWD system for off-road conditions, its superior ride comfort, handling, power, and overall execution make it the preferred choice for most buyers. The CR-V Hybrid also comes at a slightly lower price point for top trims. Although the Forester Hybrid is the best version of the Forester ever made and a strong contender for off-road enthusiasts, the CR-V Hybrid is deemed the clear winner for its better all-around performance and user experience. less
Tesla Model Y vs. Honda Prologue vs. Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Chevy Equinox EV | Electric SUV Battle
Edmunds pits the updated Tesla Model Y against key rivals: the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Chevrolet Equinox EV, and Honda Prologue. The Model Y receives signifi... morecant praise for its vastly improved ride quality, now considered best-in-class, and a much quieter, more comfortable interior with better materials. The return of the turn signal stalk and enhanced processing power for the infotainment screen are noted improvements, though the reliance on the touchscreen for nearly all functions, including shifting and climate control, remains a drawback. The FSD system is described as impressive yet occasionally erratic. Cargo space, including the frunk and underfloor storage, is highlighted as a strong point. While the base Model Y is more affordable, options like FSD can significantly increase the price. The review concludes that the Model Y is a sophisticated and impressive vehicle, provided the driver is comfortable with its minimalist, screen-centric interface. less
Dodge Charger Daytona EV vs. Dodge Challenger: Electric Performance or V8 Personality?
Edmunds pits the new electric Dodge Charger Daytona Scat Pack against its V8 predecessor, the Challenger Scat Pack, to determine if electric performan... morece can replace V8 personality. While the Charger Daytona boasts superior straight-line acceleration and braking figures, especially with optional summer tires, the reviewer finds it a deeply unsatisfying driving experience. The electric model suffers from unpredictable chassis behavior, a lack of steering feel, and intrusive stability control, making it feel like a "6,000lb boat." In contrast, the Challenger, despite its less impressive numbers and more boat-like handling on the track, is praised for its honesty, predictability, and raw V8 character. The interior of the Challenger offers a more engaging, old-school feel with physical gauges, while the Charger's modern interior lacks personality. Ultimately, the reviewer concludes that the Charger Daytona is faster but far from better, lacking the fun and personality that defines a muscle car, making the Challenger the preferred choice despite its age. less
Mercedes-Benz G-Class EV vs GMC Hummer EV | Electric SUV Off-Road Comparison Test
In an off-road comparison test pitting the electric Mercedes-Benz G-Class (G 580 with EQ Technology) against the GMC Hummer EV SUV, the G-Class delive... morered a surprising performance, excelling in two out of three key tests despite being equipped with standard summer tires. The G-Class demonstrated remarkable capability on a hill climb and a challenging "Ziggurat" articulation test, often outperforming the Hummer EV, which required more aggressive drive modes and was hampered by its weight and tire choice in some scenarios. While the Hummer EV ultimately won the "pipes" obstacle due to superior ground clearance and tire specification, the G-Class's advanced quad-motor system and sophisticated traction control were highlighted as key advantages. The reviewer found the G-Class to be superior in on-road driving dynamics, interior comfort, and overall aesthetics, making it the preferred choice despite its significantly higher price point compared to the Hummer EV. less
Honda CR-V Hybrid vs. Toyota RAV4 Hybrid vs. Mazda CX-50 Hybrid | Small Hybrid SUV Comparison Test
This comparison test evaluates the hybrid variants of the Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4, and Mazda CX-50. The reviewer highlights the RAV4 Hybrid's qui... moreck acceleration and efficiency but criticizes its mushy brakes, vague steering, and noisy engine. The CR-V Hybrid is praised for its excellent steering, comfortable ride, and superior braking performance, though its engine can be loud under hard acceleration and its hybrid powertrain is limited to higher trims. The CX-50 Hybrid, sharing its powertrain with the RAV4, offers a premium interior design and sporty handling but suffers from a firmer ride, limited touchscreen functionality, and the least cargo space. Ultimately, the CR-V Hybrid is awarded the win for its universally appealing driving experience, narrowly beating the CX-50, while the RAV4 Hybrid lands in third place due to its less refined driving dynamics and interior tech. less
Kia K4 vs. Toyota Corolla Hybrid vs. Honda Civic Hybrid: Which Compact Sedan Is Best?
In a head-to-head comparison of the Kia K4, Honda Civic Hybrid, and Toyota Corolla Hybrid, the Honda Civic Hybrid emerges as the clear winner, earning... more Edmunds' Top Rated Best of the Best award for 2025. The Civic Hybrid excels with a driving experience that is both powerful and sporty, delivering nearly 50 MPG, making it a true all-around package. While the Kia K4 impressed with its modern interior, superior technology, and ample storage, its driving dynamics were let down by turbo lag and a less engaging feel compared to the Honda. The Toyota Corolla Hybrid, though offering excellent fuel economy and value, particularly for budget-conscious buyers, falls short in interior refinement and technology, feeling dated against its competitors. The K4's GT-Line Turbo trim, while offering good tech, is deemed not worth the extra cost due to its efficiency and performance compared to the hybrid options. Ultimately, the Civic Hybrid sets a new benchmark for the compact sedan segment. less
Edmunds Top Rated 2025: The Best Cars, Trucks and SUVs for 2025
Edmunds has released its Top Rated Awards for 2025, recognizing the best vehicles across various categories. The Honda Civic Hybrid stands out, earnin... moreg both the 'Top Rated Car' and the prestigious 'Best of the Best' awards. Reviewers praised its blend of efficiency, performance, technology (including Google integration), and an upscale interior that belies its affordable starting price. The Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid is lauded as the 'Top Rated SUV' for its exceptional space, comfortable ride, and practical family-friendly features, further enhanced by its efficient hybrid powertrain. For trucks, the redesigned Ford Ranger takes the 'Top Rated Truck' title, impressing with its hauling capability, comfortable on-road manners, and versatility. In the electric vehicle segments, the Tesla Model 3 reclaims its 'Top Rated Electric Car' crown due to significant updates that improved build quality, comfort, and range (338 miles observed in testing), offering strong value. The Kia EV9 is named 'Top Rated Electric SUV' for its all-around excellence, near-luxury experience, family-friendly features, and impressive charging speed. Finally, the Rivian R1T is the 'Top Rated Electric Truck,' receiving substantial physical and software upgrades that enhance its ride, infotainment, range (nearly 400 miles observed), and off-road capability, making it a compelling modern electric truck. less
Best New Cars for 2025 | The Vehicles You Should Be Most Excited About This Year
This comprehensive "Edmunds A to Z" roundup for 2025 highlights a year of significant updates and new entries across the automotive spectrum... more. The review showcases a strong emphasis on electrification, with numerous brands introducing or refining hybrid and fully electric models, such as Bentley's powerful plug-in hybrids, BMW's new M5 hybrid, and Cadillac's ambitious Escalade IQ and Optiq. Performance remains a key theme, evident in the Corvette ZR1's staggering horsepower and the Lamborghini Temario's V12. Practicality is also addressed with updated SUVs and minivans like the Buick Enclave and Honda Odyssey. While many vehicles receive styling tweaks and tech upgrades, the integration of larger screens and advanced driver-assistance systems are recurring themes. The review notes both impressive advancements and some areas for improvement, such as the Ford Explorer's tight third row and the Mazda CX-50 hybrid's mixed performance, offering a balanced perspective for potential buyers. less
Rivian R1T vs. Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro Off-Road Comparison Test: Fully Electric vs. Hybrid Face-Off
This comparison pits the all-electric Rivian R1T Dual-Motor against the hybrid Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro in an off-road challenge. While the R1T offers im... moremense torque and a refined driving experience, particularly in softer terrain like sandy washes, its dual-motor setup struggles with challenging climbs and articulation due to a lack of a rear locker and reliance on brake torque vectoring. The reviewer found the quad-motor version to be superior for serious off-roading. The Tacoma TRD Pro, despite less outright power, proves more capable in technical off-road scenarios like hill climbs and rock crawling, thanks to its rear locker and disconnecting front sway bar. The reviewer highlights the Tacoma's more traditional and predictable off-road performance, though notes its suspension seats impede rear legroom and the camera system is subpar. Ultimately, while the R1T offers more fun in certain conditions and superior tech features (excluding Apple CarPlay), the Tacoma's mechanical advantages make it the more competent off-roader for tougher challenges. The reviewer leans towards the more expensive quad-motor R1T for ultimate off-road capability. less
Tested: Porsche Macan Electric | 0-60, Quarter Mile, Range & More
Edmunds puts the new 2024 Porsche Macan Electric through its paces, finding it to be a comfortable and technologically advanced luxury SUV with impres... moresive range and charging capabilities. However, the "4" trim level disappoints in performance metrics, lagging behind competitors and even its gasoline predecessor in acceleration and braking. While the driving dynamics on the road are refined, with excellent steering feel and a quiet cabin, the lack of outright speed is a significant drawback, especially given the nearly $100,000 price tag. The interior, while featuring some nice touches like optional adaptive sport seats and an excellent navigation system, is marred by excessive piano black plastic and a lack of physical controls. Despite its shortcomings in performance and value, the Macan EV excels in real-world range, exceeding its estimate by 44 miles, and boasts class-leading peak charging speeds. It's a compelling option for those prioritizing comfort and technology over raw speed, but potential buyers should be aware of its performance limitations relative to its cost. less