RSymons “RSEV” is a dedicated channel for electric vehicle enthusiasts, with a particular focus on in-depth reviews and comparisons of major automotive brands. The distributor specializes in analyzing the performance, reliability, and practical aspects of electric cars, offering valuable insights for potential buyers and current owners alike.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Self-Parking Cars Tesla v Audi v Ford v BMW - Test and Comparison
This video rigorously tests the self-parking capabilities of four premium electric vehicles: Tesla Model S and 3 (comparing AP1 vs. AP2/FSD), Audi e-tron GT, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT, and BMW i4 M50. The reviewer found the Tesla systems, particularly newer ones with AP2/FSD, to be surprisingly unre...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 210 total titles. Page 6 of 9.
BMW i4 M50 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range: 425 Mile Trip Comparison
This video details a 425-mile trip comparing the BMW i4 M50 (with 20" wheels) against a Tesla Model 3 Long Range (with 19" wheels). The revi... moreewer highlights the i4 M50 as a refined and comfortable cruiser, excelling in ride quality, quietness, and its advanced driver-assistance systems, which are noted as being smoother than Tesla's in certain lane-change scenarios. However, the i4's efficiency is significantly lower than the Model 3's, achieving 3.1 miles/kWh compared to the Tesla's 4.1 miles/kWh on the same journey. This resulted in a real-world range of approximately 248 miles for the i4 M50 (worst-case configuration) versus 287 miles for the Model 3 Long Range. Charging was also a point of comparison, with the i4 requiring 45 minutes total for two stops, while the Tesla could complete the journey with minimal charging. The reviewer notes the i4's platform sharing with combustion engines leads to a large central tunnel, slightly compromising driver comfort. Despite its efficiency and range drawbacks compared to the Tesla, the i4 M50 is praised as an excellent, comfortable car for long journeys, with charging times being manageable for such a trip. less
EVs with Hatchback and Tow Bar: Tesla Model Y vs BMW i4 M50 vs Polestar 2
This comparison video pits the Tesla Model Y Long Range against the BMW i4 M50 and the Polestar 2, focusing on practicality, space, and towing capabil... moreities for EVs with hatchback designs. The Model Y is lauded for its exceptional interior and boot space, user-friendly software, and superior navigation and charging planning, making it the most practical family car. However, its ride is noted as firm, and headlights are considered subpar compared to the others. The BMW i4 M50 is praised for its brutal speed, refined and luxurious cruising experience, and premium feel, making it ideal for long journeys. Its main drawbacks are lower efficiency than the Tesla and compromises due to its shared platform with ICE cars, impacting interior space and practicality. The Polestar 2 stands out with its distinctive design, quality materials, and well-integrated Google-based infotainment system. While it offers good practicality and a pleasant driving experience, it falls short in efficiency and outright speed compared to the Tesla and is noted as feeling more enclosed than the others, with a central tunnel impacting rear passenger space. less
Our Tesla Model S85 After 8 Years and 100,000 Miles Review: Running Costs, Problems, and Maintenance
After 8 years and over 100,000 miles, the Tesla Model S 85 (referred to as 'Batt Mobile') remains a surprisingly capable and cost-effective ... morevehicle. The reviewer highlights its exceptional reliability, with the original battery and drivetrain showing no signs of failure, even as the battery warranty nears its end. Key maintenance points include regular tire replacements (rear tires lasting around 17,000 miles, fronts 27,000 miles) and a replaced rear motor under warranty. Running costs are deemed very reasonable, with free Supercharging and an estimated £1500 for approximately 28,000 miles of home/office charging over two years. The car has even appreciated in value. Minor issues noted are wear on the A-pillar trim, a few failed pixels on the third brake light, and the need for a CCS adapter for modern charging. The interior, particularly the first-gen seats, has held up well, and the upgraded MCU2 significantly enhances the user experience. Despite lacking Autopilot hardware, the reviewer finds the driving experience, smooth air suspension, and high-fidelity sound system still highly enjoyable, making it a car they intend to keep. less
Electric Mini Review, Buyers Guide and Comparison Between Level 2 and 3 Trims. It's Great Fun!
This video provides a comprehensive review and buyer's guide for the Electric Mini, comparing the Level 2 and Level 3 trims. The reviewer highlig... morehts the car's fun-to-drive nature, a core Mini characteristic, despite its relatively small battery and premium price point (over £30,000). Key features of the Level 3 trim, such as leather upholstery, head-up display, keyless entry, climate control, Apple CarPlay, heated seats, sunroof, and 17-inch alloy wheels, are detailed. Practicality is also addressed, with an assessment of rear seat and boot space, including accommodation for a 6-foot individual. The reviewer expresses a strong liking for the Mini Electric, suggesting it retains the essential 'Mini' driving experience. less
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 1 Year/20,000 Mile Review - Costs, Maintenance, Problems, Likes and Dislikes
This comprehensive one-year, 20,000-mile review of the Tesla Model 3 Long Range highlights its exceptional value proposition. The reviewer is particul... morearly impressed with the near-zero maintenance costs and minimal issues encountered, praising the build quality, especially for a China-manufactured unit. Positives include the car's compact size suited for UK roads, ample storage, the convenience of phone-as-key, and Tesla's superior route planning and charging infrastructure integration. The white interior, despite concerns, proves durable and easy to clean. However, the reviewer notes minor drawbacks such as the clunky manual towbar, the lack of active matrix headlights despite the hardware being present, and a ride comfort that can feel slightly fidgety on non-performance models. The glass roof's heat insulation in the UK climate is also a minor concern. Overall, the Model 3 Long Range is lauded as a great package with surprisingly low running costs, including depreciation, making it a highly recommended EV. less
Is an Older Tesla Still Good? Model S 70D vs S85 Free Supercharging Range and Efficiency Test Review
This video thoroughly examines the viability of older Tesla Model S variants, specifically the 70D and 85, focusing on their continued relevance in to... moreday's EV market, particularly concerning free Supercharging. The reviewer highlights that despite their age and mileage (over 100,000 miles for the 85), these cars remain comfortable, refined, and capable cruisers, offering a smooth ride, good sound systems, and surprisingly decent real-world range (around 250 miles) even in warm weather at highway speeds. A key takeaway is the enduring value of free Supercharging, which significantly offsets running costs, especially with current high energy prices. While older MCU1 screens are slower and charging speeds are less rapid than newer models, the reviewer notes that these can be upgraded. The 70D and 85 demonstrated nearly identical performance and efficiency in convoy tests, with the 70D showing slightly better efficiency. The reviewer concludes that these older Teslas are compelling options for buyers seeking low running costs and a premium EV experience without the price tag of a new vehicle, especially when compared to comparable ICE luxury cars. less
Tesla Model Y From Scotland Overnight Including Sleeping in Car With Camping Mode + Detour for Drag Race
This video chronicles an ambitious 24-hour journey from Scotland back to the south coast of England in a Tesla Model Y Long Range. The reviewer highli... moreghts the car's practicality for such a demanding trip, particularly praising the "camping mode" for an overnight stay, which proved surprisingly comfortable and efficient, using only 5% battery over five hours. The Model Y's spaciousness, sound system, and glass roof are noted as significant positives. The integrated dash cam is also commended for its utility, as demonstrated during a near-miss incident. While the reviewer found the ride slightly firm on broken roads, they deemed it a "great car" for long distances and high-speed cruising. The overall efficiency was impacted by a drag race segment, but the car still managed a respectable 3 miles per kilowatt-hour over 511 miles. The reviewer concludes that the Model Y is an excellent choice for long journeys, offering comfort, space, and innovative features that make it a viable alternative to hotels for overnight stays. less
Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Tesla Model Y LR 375 Mile Race: Range, Efficiency, and Charge Speed Head-to-Head
This head-to-head comparison between the Hyundai Ioniq 5 Project 45 and the Tesla Model Y Long Range reveals distinct strengths for each EV. The Tesla... more Model Y emerges as the more efficient vehicle, achieving 3.7 miles per kilowatt-hour compared to the Ioniq 5's 3.1 miles per kilowatt-hour on the tested route. This efficiency, combined with a slightly larger usable battery capacity, gives the Model Y a real-world range advantage of approximately 50 miles over the Ioniq 5 on the day of testing (266 miles vs. 213 miles). In charging tests, the Ioniq 5 demonstrated a faster peak and sustained charging speed in the mid-range, while the Model Y hit a higher peak but tapered off more quickly. Ultimately, the Tesla Model Y won the challenge of recharging enough to complete the return journey faster, requiring less battery percentage and less time due to its superior efficiency. The reviewer noted the Ioniq 5's comfortable ride and soft suspension, while the Model Y offered firmer handling, sharper steering, and more interior space. The Tesla's preconditioning for charging was also highlighted as an advantage in colder weather. less
15k EV Challenge - The Long Journey! Ioniq v Leaf v Zoe Road Trip and Charging Speeds
This video concludes the £15,000 EV challenge series by testing the long-distance capabilities and charging speeds of the Hyundai Ioniq (28kWh), Nissa... moren Leaf (30kWh), and Renault Zoe (ZE40). The reviewer highlights that while these cars are primarily suited for city driving or occasional longer trips, they can manage longer distances with careful planning and patience. The Hyundai Ioniq is praised for its efficiency and particularly its rapid CCS charging, making it the most convenient for longer journeys despite its smaller battery. The Renault Zoe offers a better range per charge on AC but is hampered by its lack of DC rapid charging, requiring significantly longer stops for extended trips. The Nissan Leaf, while comfortable and spacious, struggles the most on motorways due to lower efficiency and range, necessitating frequent and lengthy charging stops. The reviewer concludes that for those needing to cover significant distances regularly, more premium EVs are better suited, but for occasional longer journeys, these budget EVs are capable, albeit with a time penalty. less
Swapping VW Petrol for a Tesla and Going Away on Holiday. Real World Family Use Review.
This video offers a practical, real-world family review of the Tesla Model Y Long Range, focusing on its suitability for a weekend holiday trip. The r... moreeviewer's brother-in-law, a first-time EV driver and owner of a VW Tiguan, provides his impressions. Key takeaways include positive feedback on the Model Y's spaciousness, particularly the boot and underfloor storage, and its comfortable ride, even on challenging Cornish roads. The car's responsiveness, power on steep hills, and quiet operation were highlighted as significant advantages over his petrol Tiguan. While initially finding the minimalist interior and lack of a traditional dashboard unusual, he adapted quickly. The reviewer also touches on charging convenience and cost savings compared to petrol, estimating a significant financial benefit. The reviewer's brother-in-law ultimately gives the Model Y a double thumbs up, deeming it a potential decision-maker for future EV adoption. less
15k EV Practicality Challenge: School Run & Big Box. Hyundai Ioniq v Nissan Leaf v Renault Zoe Test
This video pits three popular EVs—the Hyundai Ioniq, Nissan Leaf, and Renault Zoe—against each other in a practicality challenge focused on family lif... moree. The tests simulate a chaotic school run pickup and a "big box" cargo test. The Hyundai Ioniq, despite its "coupe" designation, surprisingly offers the best passenger space and headroom, making it the winner for school runs. However, it struggles with larger cargo. The Renault Zoe excels in the "big box" challenge, being the only car to fit the largest box, and performs well with soft luggage, but offers the least passenger space. The Nissan Leaf lands in the middle for passenger space and proves more practical for general luggage and bags due to its deeper boot, though it also fails the "big box" test without modifications. Ultimately, the Ioniq is deemed the most practical overall due to its superior passenger capacity, despite its cargo limitations. less
What Does £15,000 For A Family EV Get You, Exactly? Pt2: Hyundai Ioniq V Nissan Leaf V Renault Zoe
This video delves into the surprising value offered by three family-friendly EVs available for £15,000: the Hyundai Ioniq, Nissan Leaf, and Renault Zo... moree. The reviewer highlights that these budget-friendly cars often boast features, such as keyless entry and advanced driver aids, that are optional or absent on much more expensive vehicles like the Porsche Taycan and Tesla. The Hyundai Ioniq is praised for its efficiency, comfortable ride, and surprisingly advanced features like lane centering and radar cruise control, though its abundance of buttons is noted. The Nissan Leaf is recognized for its reliability and comfortable seats, but its efficiency and charging capabilities are less impressive than the others. The Renault Zoe, being the newest with a leased battery, offers the best range and a more modern feel, despite lacking DC charging and Apple CarPlay. Overall, the reviewer is impressed by the high specification achievable within the £15,000 budget, making these EVs a compelling option for families. less
Tesla Model Y and 3 Ultimate Real Range Test: What Happens Beyond Zero and When You Run Out of Battery
This video presents a comprehensive real-world range test of the Tesla Model Y Long Range, driving from 100% to 0% and beyond. The reviewer highlights... more that the Model Y Long Range achieved 289 miles, using 76 kWh of energy, with an average consumption of 264 Wh/mile. While this is slightly less than anticipated, the colder weather and heating usage are cited as contributing factors. A key takeaway is the detailed exploration of what happens when the battery reaches zero: the car gradually loses power, and crucially, the 12-volt system shuts down quickly, preventing door operation and charging acceptance without external power. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of leaving a door ajar or window down before the 12-volt dies to avoid being locked out. Charging to 80% on a V3 Supercharger took 30 minutes, costing £31.16 for a full charge from near-empty at 41 pence per kWh, significantly more than home charging. The test also included a comparison with a Model 3 Long Range, though the primary focus remained on the Model Y's endurance and critical low-battery behavior. less
£15k Family EV Challenge: Hyundai Ioniq v Nissan Leaf v Renault Zoe. Pt1 - Taxi Duties Range Test!
This video initiates a compelling challenge series, pitting three popular electric vehicles—the Hyundai Ioniq, Nissan Leaf 30kWh Tekna, and Renault Zo... moree ZE40—against each other to determine what £15,000 can buy in the family EV market. The initial 'taxi duties' range test reveals significant differences in efficiency, with the Ioniq consuming approximately 18kWh for 95 miles, while the Leaf and Zoe used around 28kWh. This translates to a substantial cost saving for the Ioniq, costing only £3 for the tested distance. The reviewer emphasizes that while premium EVs offer ease of use, this series aims to explore the practicalities and limitations of more budget-friendly options for family life and everyday use. less
Giving Jonny Smith a Ride in His Old Chevy Volt, Petrolheads Who Like EVs Idol Chat
This video features an engaging conversation between the host and Jonny Smith, the former owner of the Chevrolet Volt (Vauxhall Ampera) now driven by ... morethe host. The discussion highlights the Volt's enduring qualities, such as its comfortable ride, solid build, and surprisingly good lifetime fuel economy (86 mpg). Smith expresses fondness for the car, regretting its sale and praising its engineering and unique 'iPod-style' interior. The conversation touches upon the evolving automotive landscape, contrasting the practicality and cost-effectiveness of EVs and PHEVs with traditional internal combustion engine cars. Both agree that while petrolheads can still appreciate EVs, the practicality of modern electric cars makes them ideal for daily commuting, allowing enthusiasts to keep classic petrol cars for weekend enjoyment. The video also delves into Jonny Smith's career path into automotive journalism and design, and the host's business, emphasizing a shared passion for cars across different eras and powertrains. less
Cost Per Mile Comparison: Diesel v Electric v Plug-in Hybrid Tested Side-by-Side in Convoy
This video presents a compelling, real-world cost-per-mile comparison between a Mercedes S350d (diesel), a Tesla Model S85D (electric), and a Chevrole... moret Volt (plug-in hybrid) over a 31.4-mile journey. The reviewer highlights the efficiency of the diesel, achieving 48.7 mpg and costing £5.24 for the one-way trip. The Tesla, running purely on electricity, was the most cost-effective at £1.83 for the same distance, averaging 3.45 miles per kWh. The Chevrolet Volt also performed well on electric power for the outbound journey, covering 31.4 miles on electricity alone with impressive efficiency (3.58 miles/kWh) at a cost of £1.76. However, the return journey, which necessitated using the petrol engine, significantly increased the Volt's running costs to £11.02 for 88.7 miles, averaging 12 pence per mile. The reviewer concludes that while plug-in hybrids have their place for shorter, electric-only commutes, pure electric vehicles like the Tesla offer the most significant long-term cost savings for higher mileage drivers, even when considering potential overnight charging tariffs. The diesel remains a viable, albeit more expensive, option for those prioritizing traditional powertrains. less
How Far Can They Really Go? Tesla Model Y, S, 3 Long Range Models Tested: Range vs Efficiency Comparison
This video provides a practical, real-world comparison of the range and efficiency of three Tesla Long Range models: Model Y, Model S, and Model 3. Th... moree reviewer emphasizes that the tests were conducted under chilly conditions (4-12 degrees Celsius) and on motorways, aiming for realistic driving scenarios rather than hypermiling. The Model Y Long Range (with 20" wheels) achieved a real-world range of approximately 271 miles, with the reviewer suggesting 300 miles is possible in warmer weather. The Model 3 Long Range (with 19" wheels) delivered a comparable 269 miles under similar conditions. While the Model S Long Range was also tested, its specific range and efficiency figures for the tested leg are not explicitly stated in the summary, though it's noted as being 'normally very good' and 'slippery'. A significant takeaway is the cost comparison, highlighting that even with Supercharger rates, the electric journey was substantially cheaper than equivalent petrol or diesel travel, especially when considering home charging costs. The reviewer also shares useful tips on using the Tesla calendar sync for navigation and performing factory resets when selling a vehicle. less
Hold My Beer Challenge! Ride Quality Comparison Test - Tesla Model S 3 X Y vs Mercedes S-Class
This "Hold My Beer" challenge, while unconventional, served as a practical, albeit messy, test of ride comfort across several electric vehic... moreles and a Mercedes S-Class. The Tesla Model S, particularly with its air suspension, was noted for its smoothness, though it still lost a significant amount of beer. The Model X, featuring adaptive damping, performed slightly better than the Model S. The Model 3 and Model Y were perceived as firmer, with the Model Y being the firmest and losing the most beer, suggesting a less compliant ride, especially for rear passengers. The Mercedes S-Class, acting as the benchmark, proved to be the smoothest overall, losing the least amount of beer. The Renault Twizy, as expected, was the worst performer, with the most spillage, highlighting its basic suspension.
Key takeaways indicate that while Teslas offer a generally comfortable ride, the S-Class sets a higher standard for plushness. The experiment effectively demonstrated how suspension tuning impacts passenger comfort and the potential for spills, translating real-world bumps into quantifiable beer loss. less
Key takeaways indicate that while Teslas offer a generally comfortable ride, the S-Class sets a higher standard for plushness. The experiment effectively demonstrated how suspension tuning impacts passenger comfort and the potential for spills, translating real-world bumps into quantifiable beer loss. less
Trying a Yoke Steering Wheel on a Tesla in the UK: Model 3 and S (also fits Y and X)
The reviewer tests an aftermarket yoke steering wheel for Tesla vehicles, specifically focusing on its fitment in the Model 3 and Model S in the UK. W... morehile acknowledging the divisive nature of yoke steering, the reviewer finds it surprisingly intuitive and enjoyable after a short acclimatization period. Key positives include enhanced visibility, a more engaging and "sporting" feel on country roads, and a forced "proper" hand position, which the reviewer believes promotes better driving habits. The yoke is also found to be comfortable for cruising and even manageable for parking and three-point turns, though it requires a slight adjustment. The reviewer notes that while the Model S's slower steering rack necessitates more adjustments, the yoke still functions well. A significant concern raised is the potential impact on insurance claims. Ultimately, the reviewer is impressed, giving a "thumbs up" to the yoke, particularly for its integration with the Model 3's low dashboard, and anticipates it will be a popular retrofit option. less
Tesla Model Y Review After 1100 Miles of Family Life: The Good, The Bad, and The Long Term Efficiency
After 1100 miles of intensive family and business use, the Tesla Model Y Long Range is hailed as a near-perfect family EV. The reviewer praises its er... moregonomic size, striking a balance between being spacious for passengers and cargo without feeling too large. The interior, particularly the white upholstery, is noted for its durability and practicality, along with the exceptionally large center console and door bins offering immense storage. The car's sharp steering, agile handling, and quick acceleration are highlighted as significant positives, making it surprisingly sporting for its size. However, criticisms are leveled at the firm ride quality, especially at lower speeds, and the headlights, which are considered subpar for the price point compared to competitors offering matrix and dynamic features. The reviewer also points out minor issues with the pre-delivery preparation, such as incorrect tire pressures and paint swirl marks, and the lack of puddle lights. Despite these drawbacks, the overall verdict is overwhelmingly positive, positioning the Model Y as arguably the best family EV available, provided the budget allows, with real-world efficiency averaging around 3.4 miles per kWh and an estimated range of 240-300 miles depending on conditions. less
Tesla Model Y Practicality Test: Bikes, Passengers and Big Box vs. Other Electric Family Cars
This video provides a comprehensive practicality test of the Tesla Model Y, directly comparing its interior space and cargo capacity against the Model... more S, Model X, and Model 3. The reviewer focuses on fitting large boxes, a mountain bike, and passengers, offering a real-world perspective on the Model Y's utility. While the Model Y impressively accommodates the large "big box" challenge, albeit just barely touching the headliner, it falls short for the mountain bike compared to the Model S, which offers a wider boot opening. In passenger tests, the Model Y proves more accommodating than the Model 3 and S, particularly with its folding middle seat section, but the Model X remains the most spacious and comfortable for multiple occupants. The reviewer concludes that while the Model Y is highly practical for its class, the Model X excels in outright space, and the Model S surprisingly wins the mountain bike challenge due to its wider aperture. less
New Tesla Model Y Collection Day - Huge Event in Southampton, UK. Plus S3XYR All Together!
This video documents the collection of a new Tesla Model Y in Southampton, UK, highlighting a large-scale handover event with approximately 1,000 vehi... morecles. The reviewer takes viewers through the streamlined, airport-style check-in process and the initial setup of the car, including pairing a phone as a key and configuring driver profiles. The vehicle featured has deep blue paint, a white interior, and 20-inch wheels, with the reviewer noting the presence of standard PPF protection and front mud flaps. Build quality, originating from China, is praised as being on par with previous Model 3s. Initial driving impressions suggest familiarity for Model 3 owners, with notable improvements in visibility and headroom. A brief, less-than-30-mile comparison between 19-inch and 20-inch wheels indicated a slight efficiency advantage for the smaller wheels (259 Wh/mile vs. 267 Wh/mile), though a more extensive test is promised. The reviewer expresses satisfaction with the Model Y's suitability as a family car. less
Audi Q5 TFSi Petrol vs Electric Q4 e-tron or VW ID.4 / Enyaq: Cost Comparisons Explained
The reviewer thoroughly examines the Audi Q5 TFSi, acknowledging it as a competent and pleasant family SUV. However, the core argument of the video is... more a strong condemnation of choosing this internal combustion engine (ICE) model over its electric counterparts like the Audi Q4 e-tron, VW ID.4, or Skoda Enyaq. The reviewer highlights significant cost advantages for EVs, including lower purchase prices (contrary to common belief), drastically reduced running costs (electricity vs. petrol), free road tax, and superior residual values. The practicality of home charging, zero tailpipe emissions for school runs, and lower company car tax are also emphasized. While admitting the Q5 is a good car in isolation, the reviewer finds no logical justification for purchasing it over an EV for most users, citing overwhelming financial and environmental benefits for electric options. less
Kia EV6 RWD Weekend Away: Practicality and Efficiency Test, Good Cold Weather Range (No Heater)
This review of the Kia EV6 GT Line S (RWD) focuses on its real-world practicality and efficiency during a weekend trip in cold weather. The reviewer h... moreighlights the car's spaciousness, comfortable rear seating for three, and decent boot capacity, accommodating luggage and even a horse statue. The RWD version is noted as being slightly more efficient than the AWD model, achieving an average of 3.1 miles/kWh, with a real-world range estimated between 225-260 miles in cold conditions. The adaptive cruise control and matrix headlights are praised for their functionality. However, the primary drawback is a significant and recurring heating system failure, attributed to a faulty inverter, which marred the overall experience. Despite this critical issue, the reviewer concludes that the EV6 is a practical, spacious, comfortable, and good value all-rounder, provided the heating system is functioning correctly. Kia's prompt resolution of the heating issue via a recall is also noted positively. less