RSymons “RSEV”

RSymons “RSEV”

111K
RSymons “RSEV” is a dedicated channel for electric vehicle enthusiasts, with a particular focus on in-depth reviews and comparisons of major automotive brands. The distributor specializes in analyzing the performance, reliability, and practical aspects of electric cars, offering valuable insights for potential buyers and current owners alike.

Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.

Latest Additions

Showing 18 of 210 total titles. Page 9 of 9.

Tesla Model S 3 X Top Hints, Tips, Tricks, and Advice

Tesla Model S 3 X Top Hints, Tips, Tricks, and Advice

This comprehensive guide from R Symons LTD offers a wealth of practical tips and tricks for Tesla owners, covering the Model S, 3, and X. The reviewer... emphasizes security features like 'allow mobile access' and 'pin to drive,' cautioning users about potential risks with used vehicles and keyless entry. Practical advice is given on maximizing charging speeds at Superchargers, utilizing calendar sync for navigation, and configuring driver profiles for comfort and convenience. The video also touches on less common features like voice commands, the "fart mode," and "dog mode," while highlighting potential issues such as MCU failure and tire wear. A key takeaway is the importance of understanding Autopilot's limitations as beta software. The reviewer strongly recommends joining Tesla owner groups for ongoing support and information. less
VW ID4 vs Tesla Model 3 S X vs Audi E-Tron vs Hyundai Kona vs Kia E-Niro Range Efficiency and Charging

VW ID4 vs Tesla Model 3 S X vs Audi E-Tron vs Hyundai Kona vs Kia E-Niro Range Efficiency and Charging

This video presents a comprehensive real-world comparison of several family-sized electric vehicles, focusing on efficiency and charging speed. The te... st, conducted under optimal conditions (warm weather, convoy driving), revealed significant variations. The Tesla Model 3 Long Range emerged as a standout for its exceptional efficiency (4.76 miles/kWh) and rapid charging, enabling it to depart for the return journey in just 7 minutes. The Hyundai Kona also impressed with its efficiency (4.7 miles/kWh), offering a theoretical range of over 300 miles. While the Audi e-tron and Tesla Model X were less efficient, they compensated with faster charging speeds. The older Tesla Model S 85 demonstrated respectable efficiency and range degradation over seven years. The VW ID.4 performed adequately but was outshone in efficiency by others. The Kia e-Niro, while efficient, was slightly less so than its Hyundai Kona counterpart. The review highlights that while some EVs excel in efficiency and others in charging speed, all tested vehicles are deemed capable family cars, with the Kona and e-Niro praised for their value. less
Tesla Model 3 In-depth Paint Review: Made in China vs USA Built Comparison

Tesla Model 3 In-depth Paint Review: Made in China vs USA Built Comparison

This video delves into the paint quality of the Tesla Model 3, specifically comparing vehicles manufactured in China versus those from the Fremont, US... A factory. Using a paint thickness gauge, the reviewer found that while Made in China Model 3s may have slightly thicker paint along the seals, overall thickness is consistent with Fremont-built cars and comparable to other manufacturers like BMW, Mercedes, and Audi, generally falling between 95-135 microns. Crucially, the expert opinion suggests a significant improvement in paint quality from the China-built models, noting less orange peel and fewer imperfections, placing it on par with German manufacturers. The review also touches upon the vulnerability of certain areas to stone chipping and the effectiveness of PPF protection. While color variations showed no significant thickness differences between shades on the Model 3, the Model S generally exhibited slightly thicker paint than the Model 3 across the same colors. less
VW ID.4 Full Review by a Tesla Owner. ID4 or Against? Has Volkswagen Got This Right?

VW ID.4 Full Review by a Tesla Owner. ID4 or Against? Has Volkswagen Got This Right?

The Volkswagen ID.4 is presented as a strong contender in the family EV market, particularly for those transitioning from traditional internal combust... ion engine vehicles. The reviewer, a Tesla owner, highlights its practicality, comfort, and sensible pricing as key strengths, making it a compelling alternative to diesel SUVs like the Tiguan or Mercedes GLC. Positives include a quiet and comfortable ride, good real-world range (200-220 miles), respectable charging times, and a functional, well-built interior. However, the review points out several drawbacks: the software can be buggy, leading to navigation crashes and issues with driver assistance systems. The reviewer also notes a lack of expected features in the 'First Edition' trim, such as keyless entry, a power tailgate, and wireless phone charging. Driving dynamics are described as adequate rather than exciting, with particular criticism for the slow acceleration in Eco mode and the unintuitive interface for changing drive modes. Despite these criticisms, the overall verdict is highly positive, positioning the ID.4 as a well-rounded, practical, and recommendable family EV. less
VW ID.4 vs Tesla Model 3 EV Road Trip: Efficiency, Charging Speed, Real World Range, and a Race!

VW ID.4 vs Tesla Model 3 EV Road Trip: Efficiency, Charging Speed, Real World Range, and a Race!

This video pits the Volkswagen ID.4 1st Edition against the Tesla Model 3 Long Range in a comprehensive road trip from Edinburgh to the South Coast, e... valuating efficiency, real-world range, and charging speed. The reviewer, new to the ID.4, found it to be a capable and comfortable family car, offering a sensible range and decent charging speeds, though it doesn't quite match the Tesla's efficiency or faster charging capabilities. The ID.4 achieved approximately 220 miles of range at 60-70 mph in 11.5°C weather, and charged from 1% to 80% in 39 minutes at an Ionity 350kW charger, peaking at 127kW. The reviewer was particularly impressed with the ID.4's value proposition at £40,000, suggesting it's a strong alternative to ICE SUVs. While the Tesla Model 3 proved more efficient and quicker to charge, the ID.4 held its own, making the long journey feasible with just one significant charging stop. A potential discrepancy in reported kilowatt-hours added by chargers versus vehicle displays was also noted as an area for further investigation. less
Tesla Model 3 Ultimate Buyers Guide - Versions, Revisions, Options, Problems Explained

Tesla Model 3 Ultimate Buyers Guide - Versions, Revisions, Options, Problems Explained

This comprehensive guide delves into the various Tesla Model 3 versions and revisions available since its UK launch in 2019, with a particular focus o... n the used market. The reviewer, an experienced owner and seller, meticulously breaks down the four main models: Standard Range (RWD, ~200 miles real-world range), Long Range (AWD, ~270 miles real-world range), the lesser-known 'Performance Minus' (essentially a Long Range with performance acceleration but fewer visual upgrades), and the full Performance model (distinguished by 20-inch wheels, upgraded brakes, and track mode). Key updates like the late 2020 refresh (black chrome, heat pump, 82kWh battery for Performance) and the shift to China-sourced vehicles are explained. Interior options, including the durable ultra-white seats and the polarizing wooden dashboard, are discussed, along with practicalities like the center console evolution and the single-screen interface. The guide also touches on Autopilot features, premium connectivity, and potential issues such as water in tail lights, steering squeaks, and paint chipping, while reassuring viewers of the Model 3's overall reliability and value, especially with desirable options like Full Self-Driving on the used market. less
Audi E-Tron vs Tesla Model 3 Challenge: Point A to B and Recharged EV Race Comparison

Audi E-Tron vs Tesla Model 3 Challenge: Point A to B and Recharged EV Race Comparison

This video presents a compelling charging race between a 2019 Audi E-Tron and a 2019 Tesla Model 3 Long Range, challenging the common perception of th... e Tesla's dominance. While acknowledging the Model 3's superior efficiency, the E-Tron demonstrates a significant advantage in charging speed, particularly for topping up the battery. The reviewer highlights that the Audi can reach 90% charge considerably faster than the Tesla, allowing the E-Tron driver to head home earlier. The video emphasizes that with access to fast chargers, the E-Tron can effectively compete, even winning this specific challenge. The reviewer, a self-proclaimed Tesla fan, expresses surprise at the outcome but reaffirms his positive experiences with the E-Tron's charging capabilities, promising further reviews on its charging experiences with various networks. less
Used Tesla Model X Ultimate Buyers Guide - Problems, History, Options Explained

Used Tesla Model X Ultimate Buyers Guide - Problems, History, Options Explained

This comprehensive buyer's guide for the used Tesla Model X highlights its distinctive features like falcon wing doors and multi-seat configurati... ons. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of understanding the various battery sizes (75D, 90D, 100D) and their real-world range implications, cautioning that advertised figures can be optimistic. Key areas of concern for used models include potential issues with power doors, active spoilers (on P100Ds), and common paint rubbing on falcon wing doors. The guide also details interior options, seating configurations (5, 6, or 7 seats), and the impact of larger wheels on range. A critical point is the clarification on 'free Supercharging,' noting it was primarily available on very early models and often doesn't transfer to subsequent owners. The reviewer advises thorough checks on tires (inner edge wear), brakes, suspension, and screen functionality. Overall, the Model X is presented as a capable family car with a manageable list of potential issues for used buyers. less
Made in China! New UK Tesla Model 3 Side by Side Comparisons v US Made. Which is Better?

Made in China! New UK Tesla Model 3 Side by Side Comparisons v US Made. Which is Better?

This video provides a detailed comparison between the new 'Made in China' Tesla Model 3 and its US-made predecessors, specifically for the U... K market. The reviewer highlights several key differences, including the addition of a heated steering wheel and a revised dashboard trim that extends into the door cards. While the reviewer notes potential challenges for aftermarket customization due to the new trim, they find the overall fit and finish to be comparable to Fremont-built models. Panel gaps and paint quality are scrutinized, with the reviewer concluding that while minor nitpicks exist, the build quality is generally on par, with some areas even showing slight improvements over older models. The reviewer also touches on subtle changes in speaker design and a more robust under-motor panel. Ultimately, the video suggests that for the average consumer, the differences between the Chinese and US-built Model 3s are negligible, with both offering a similar quality experience. less
Used Tesla Model S Ultimate Buyers Guide - Problems, History, Options Explained

Used Tesla Model S Ultimate Buyers Guide - Problems, History, Options Explained

This comprehensive buyer's guide for the used Tesla Model S covers essential aspects for potential owners. The reviewer, an experienced car deale... r and Tesla owner, emphasizes the importance of purchasing from reputable independent dealers who offer thorough inspections and transparency, especially regarding transferable free Supercharging, which Tesla direct sales often remove. The guide details the evolution of the Model S from 2014 to 2019, highlighting key changes like the introduction of Autopilot hardware, facelifted designs (2016), MCU-2 upgrades (2018), and the 'Raven' revisions (2019) with adaptive damping. Common issues such as door handle malfunctions, headlight daytime running light failures, and screen problems (MCU-1) are discussed, with an emphasis on their repairability and cost. The reviewer notes that while some issues exist, they are generally not common and often easily resolved, especially with the extensive battery and motor warranty lasting eight years. Overall, the Model S is presented as a reliable and enjoyable vehicle, with a strong recommendation to carefully check specific features and software, particularly Autopilot capabilities, before purchase. less
Audi E-Tron 55 Review By A Tesla Owner. Would I Swap? Side By Side Comparison Vs Model X S 3

Audi E-Tron 55 Review By A Tesla Owner. Would I Swap? Side By Side Comparison Vs Model X S 3

The reviewer, a long-time Tesla owner, provides a comprehensive comparison between the Audi E-Tron 55 Launch Edition and various Tesla models (X, S, 3... ). The Audi E-Tron is praised for its exceptional comfort, build quality, refinement, and quietness, offering a ride comparable to a Mercedes S-Class. Its interior materials and seats are highlighted as superior. However, the Tesla is deemed the better overall car due to its superior technology, app connectivity, constant software updates, and features like Sentry Mode. The reviewer notes the E-Tron's less intuitive infotainment system compared to Tesla's single-screen approach, and its slower charging curve, despite a faster peak charge rate. While the E-Tron's driving dynamics are more relaxed and comfortable, Teslas offer more steering feel and significantly better performance. The reviewer ultimately decides to keep the Audi E-Tron for its comfort and refinement, despite acknowledging Tesla as the more advanced and practical EV, and plans to sell his Tesla Model 3. less
2014 Tesla Model S vs 2019 Model 3 Performance 500 Mile Convoy Comparison: Efficiency, Charging Speed

2014 Tesla Model S vs 2019 Model 3 Performance 500 Mile Convoy Comparison: Efficiency, Charging Speed

This video presents a compelling real-world comparison between a 2014 Tesla Model S 85 and a 2019 Model 3 Performance over a 500+ mile journey in chal... lenging winter conditions. The reviewer highlights the Model S's enduring comfort and suitability as a long-distance cruiser, praising its smooth ride and solid build quality, even after seven years and 73,000 miles. While efficiency proved nearly identical between the two vehicles (averaging 354 Wh/mile for the S and 353 Wh/mile for the 3), the primary differentiator emerged in charging speed. The Model 3 consistently recharged faster, with the Model S requiring approximately 10-15 minutes longer per charging stop to add 100 miles of range. Over the entire journey, this translated to an estimated extra 30-35 minutes of charging time for the older Model S. Despite this, the reviewer concludes that the Model S remains a highly capable and enjoyable car for extensive travel, with the charging time difference being a manageable trade-off for its superior comfort on the motorway. less
Tesla Model 3 Performance 2,000 Mile Review and Efficiency Comparison vs. Old Model. Is It Worth Changing?

Tesla Model 3 Performance 2,000 Mile Review and Efficiency Comparison vs. Old Model. Is It Worth Changing?

This long-term review of the refreshed Tesla Model 3 Performance covers over 2,000 miles, focusing on efficiency comparisons with older models and cha... rging speeds. The reviewer notes that while the new model offers slight efficiency gains over the previous Performance version (averaging 336 Wh/mile vs. 346 Wh/mile in real-world, cold, wet conditions), it was less efficient than the older Long Range model (329 Wh/mile). Charging speeds at V3 Superchargers were also found to be slightly slower than the older Performance model, with the new car drawing 106 kW at 40% charge compared to 115 kW for the older one. Despite these minor drawbacks, the reviewer highlights improvements in build fit and finish, the convenience of the USB in the glovebox, and the improved center console. However, the reviewer concludes that for most owners, the real-world differences may not justify upgrading from an older Model 3 Performance, suggesting that keeping the existing car and saving money might be the more prudent choice. less
New Tesla Model S and X Unveiled! What's New?

New Tesla Model S and X Unveiled! What's New?

This video provides an unscripted discussion on the Tesla Model S and X refresh, focusing on the subtle exterior changes and more significant interior... updates. The reviewers note the exterior's similarity to previous models, with minor tweaks to the bumper and seals, suggesting a gentle evolution rather than a radical redesign. Interior highlights include the controversial yoke steering wheel (with an option for a traditional wheel), a landscape-oriented central screen, and updated dashboard vents mirroring the Model 3. While the performance figures for the Plaid and Plaid+ models are impressive, the discussion leans towards the practicality and value of the Long Range variant. The reviewers express a desire for more substantial exterior changes but acknowledge the cohesive design language across the Tesla lineup. The video also touches upon the potential impact on the used car market, suggesting that the limited changes might stabilize current used prices. less
New 2021 vs 2020 Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance Side-by-Side Comparison

New 2021 vs 2020 Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance Side-by-Side Comparison

This video provides a detailed side-by-side comparison of the 2021 and 2020 Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance variants. The reviewers highlight sev... eral key differences, including updated wheels with different tire profiles, de-chromed exterior trim on the newer model, and revised headlights. While acknowledging the aesthetic appeal of the de-chrome and new wheels, they note mixed opinions among owners. The interior sees minor updates like a titanium-finish trim and aluminum scroll wheels, though the core experience remains similar. A significant point of discussion is the lack of substantial performance or range improvements, with the larger battery not translating to a noticeable difference in acceleration or efficiency in their initial tests. The reviewers suggest that while the changes are appreciated, they are not drastic enough to warrant an immediate upgrade from a 2020 model. They also mention a slightly improved ride quality in the 2021 model, potentially attributed to the new Pirelli tires, and plan further in-depth reviews on specific components like tires and headlights. less
New 2021 Refresh Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance Efficiency Group Test Comparison Vs Old

New 2021 Refresh Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance Efficiency Group Test Comparison Vs Old

This video presents a comprehensive efficiency comparison test between the new 2021 Tesla Model 3 Long Range Performance and previous versions, alongs... ide Model 3 Long Range variants with and without aero covers, and two Model X vehicles. The reviewer highlights that the new 2021 Model 3 Performance shows only marginal efficiency gains over older performance models, averaging 296 Wh/mile compared to 302-314 Wh/mile for the older ones. The Model 3 Long Range with aero covers proved most efficient at 269 Wh/mile, while the non-aero version was slightly less so at 279 Wh/mile. Notably, an older 2014 Model S 85, despite not being part of the formal test and facing filming duties, achieved an impressive 295 Wh/mile, outperforming the new Model 3 Performance. The Model X variants were significantly less efficient. Charging speed tests also showed no substantial improvement for the new model. The reviewer concludes that the efficiency difference in the new Model 3 Performance is not dramatic, and suggests further testing in different conditions. less
Electric Vehicle Q&A Live Stream with R Symons and EV News Daily

Electric Vehicle Q&A Live Stream with R Symons and EV News Daily

This live Q&A session featuring Richard Symons and Martyn Lee of EV News Daily aims to demystify electric vehicles (EVs) by addressing common conc... erns and criticisms. The hosts, both experienced in the EV space, tackle topics ranging from the definition of hybrids (mild, plug-in, and self-charging) to range anxiety, cost, and the future of hydrogen. They emphasize that 'self-charging' hybrids are misleading and do not qualify as EVs, while plug-in hybrids can serve as a stepping stone but require user engagement (plugging in) to be effective. The discussion strongly advocates for pure EVs, highlighting their simplicity, driving pleasure, and decreasing costs, especially when considering total cost of ownership. They debunk the myth of limited range for EVs, citing personal experiences and the rapid expansion of charging infrastructure, particularly the advancements in rapid charging technology. The hosts also address battery longevity and replacement concerns, reassuring viewers that EV batteries are designed for long life and that the total cost of ownership, including fuel and maintenance savings, makes EVs increasingly competitive, even against premium internal combustion engine vehicles. The overarching message is one of education and dispelling misinformation, encouraging a more informed adoption of EVs. less
Gridserve Braintree Electric Forecourt Tour - Important Note for Tesla Owners

Gridserve Braintree Electric Forecourt Tour - Important Note for Tesla Owners

The Gridserve Braintree Electric Forecourt is presented as a significant advancement in EV charging infrastructure, aiming to future-proof the UK'... ;s charging network. The facility boasts a variety of charging speeds, including 350kW CCS rapid chargers, alongside 7kW and 50kW options, catering to a wide range of EVs. A key highlight is the integration of renewable energy sources, with solar panels and significant battery storage (6 MWh) ensuring a green energy supply. The forecourt also offers amenities like Costa Coffee, WHSmith, and meeting rooms, enhancing the charging experience. A crucial point for Tesla owners is the potential inability to use the new CCS-only superchargers if their Model S or X lacks the CCS adapter and corresponding software update, limiting them to slower 7kW chargers or requiring the CHAdeMO adapter for 50kW charging. The reviewer emphasizes the importance of education and seamless solutions for EV adoption, praising Gridserve's comprehensive approach. less