ELON MUSK FAILS CYBERTRUCK STAINLESS STEEL METALLURGY TEST

EV Channels Review

John Cadogan critically analyzes Elon Musk's claims regarding the Tesla Cybertruck's stainless steel exoskeleton. Cadogan debunks the assertion that the unique angular design is necessary to avoid breaking stamping presses, explaining that 300-grade stainless steel, while workable, has limitations. He highlights that the material's hardness is often overstated, comparing it unfavorably to common tools and noting it can be scratched by a scouring pad. Cadogan clarifies that while the steel is tough and bullet-resistant (a largely irrelevant attribute for a vehicle), its tensile strength is significantly lower than the advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) used in conventional cars, some of which are twice as strong. He concludes that the Cybertruck's aesthetic is dictated by the material's forming limitations rather than press durability, and that its choice results in a vehicle prone to scratching, with potentially high repair and insurance costs, and objectively inferior strength compared to mainstream vehicles.