RSymons “RSEV” is a dedicated channel for electric vehicle enthusiasts, with a particular focus on in-depth reviews and comparisons of major automotive brands. The distributor specializes in analyzing the performance, reliability, and practical aspects of electric cars, offering valuable insights for potential buyers and current owners alike.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Self-Parking Cars Tesla v Audi v Ford v BMW - Test and Comparison
This video rigorously tests the self-parking capabilities of four premium electric vehicles: Tesla Model S and 3 (comparing AP1 vs. AP2/FSD), Audi e-tron GT, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT, and BMW i4 M50. The reviewer found the Tesla systems, particularly newer ones with AP2/FSD, to be surprisingly unre...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 210 total titles. Page 8 of 9.
Tesla Model Y Interior Space Compared Side-by-Side With The Competition: EV SUV Mega Test
This video provides a practical, side-by-side comparison of interior and boot space across several electric SUVs, with a particular focus on the Tesla... more Model Y. The reviewer highlights the Model Y's exceptional cabin and boot space, noting its practical storage solutions, including a large frunk. While acknowledging the minimalist interior, the reviewer finds it intuitive and functional. Other standout vehicles include the Skoda Enyaq for its surprisingly spacious interior and premium feel, and the Hyundai Ioniq 5 for its distinctive design and generous space. The reviewer concludes that the Model Y offers the most practical space, the Enyaq impresses with its interior and space efficiency, and the Ioniq 5 is praised for its unique approach. The video serves as a useful visual guide for potential buyers prioritizing interior practicality. less
Tesla Model Y Driven in the UK vs Model 3: Efficiency, Range & In-Depth Review (Dual Motor Long Range)
The Tesla Model Y Dual Motor Long Range is reviewed against the Model 3, focusing on real-world efficiency, practicality, and driving dynamics. The re... moreviewer finds the Model Y to be a "bloody brilliant" all-rounder, offering significant practicality gains over the Model 3, particularly in boot space and rear passenger comfort due to its hatchback design and increased interior volume. Efficiency is remarkably similar between the two, with the Model Y proving only slightly less efficient in real-world highway driving, a testament to its design. Key criticisms are directed at the firm ride quality, which can feel a bit jarring on UK roads, and the sharp steering, which might be too aggressive for a larger crossover. Despite these minor points, the Model Y is praised for its performance, sharp handling, and overall versatility, making it a highly practical and fun family car that justifies its expected popularity. less
Getting the Best From Charging Your EV in the UK - Tesla and Non-Tesla Electric Vehicles
This video provides a comprehensive beginner's guide to charging electric vehicles in the UK, covering both Tesla and non-Tesla models. The prese... morenter, an experienced EV driver, emphasizes the simplicity of EV charging, especially with home chargers, which ensures a full 'tank' each morning for daily use. For public charging, the guide differentiates between slower 'destination charging' (e.g., at supermarkets or hotels) and rapid charging, highlighting the importance of understanding charging speeds (kW) relative to battery size (kWh). A key focus is on Tesla charging, explaining the CCS adapter for Model S/X, the 'urinal rule' for V2 Superchargers to avoid power sharing, and the general advice to charge only up to 80% for optimal speed. For non-Tesla owners, the presenter stresses the importance of researching faster chargers (e.g., 175kW over 50kW) and using apps like 'A Better Routeplanner' and 'Zap Map' to find them, as in-car navigation might not always suggest the fastest options. The review concludes that while public charging costs are higher than home charging, they remain cheaper than petrol, and planning is key for efficient long-distance travel. less
EV Only Track Battle: Porsche Taycan 4S vs Tesla Model 3 & S. How Many Laps and Miles Per Charge?
This video documents the UK's first EV-only track day, challenging the notion that electric cars are not suitable for track use. The reviewer hig... morehlights the Porsche Taycan 4S, Tesla Model 3 Long Range, and Tesla Model S Long Range Performance. While the Taycan 4S demonstrated strong performance and good brakes, it exhibited significant understeer and extreme tire wear after 49 miles, averaging 1500 Wh/mile. The Model 3 Long Range, used primarily as a camera car, performed surprisingly well for a standard vehicle, averaging 1200 Wh/mile over 30 miles, though its brakes and suspension were noted as limitations for regular track use. The Model S Long Range Performance was a surprise contender, handling well with good straight-line speed, though its brakes heated up after about five laps. The event successfully proved that EVs can be fun and capable on track, with many Teslas completing numerous laps. The organizer, John from Tevo Solutions, emphasized the feasibility and enjoyment of EV track days, suggesting more events will follow. less
The New Mercedes EQS 450+ Up Close Prod and Poke In-Depth Walk-Around. The New Electric S-Class
This in-depth walk-around of the Mercedes EQS 450+ focuses on a 'prod and poke' approach, offering a first-hand look at the electric S-Class... more. The reviewer highlights the car's sleek design, advanced digital light and active aero features, and the impressive, albeit potentially optimistic, estimated range of 400 miles from its 100+ kWh battery. Positives include the spacious interior, comfortable seating with reclining rear seats, a large head-up display, and the premium Burmester sound system. However, the reviewer notes several quirks, particularly with the power-operated doors, which can be resistant and require a specific, sometimes counter-intuitive, operation. Panel gaps on the press car are also mentioned as a potential concern. While rear-seat space is generally good, the floor height due to the battery pack slightly compromises under-seat foot room for taller passengers. The reviewer concludes that while it's a comfortable place for journeys, some operational aspects, especially the doors, need refinement. less
Tesla Model 3 SR+ Efficiency vs Vauxhall Corsa-e: 370 Miles in a Day (Cannot Be Done Says Guy Martin)
This video challenges the notion that electric cars are only suitable for short, 50-mile trips, as suggested by Guy Martin. The reviewer undertakes a ... morenearly 400-mile round trip, delivering a Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus and using a Vauxhall Corsa-e as a convoy vehicle. The primary focus is on comparing the efficiency and charging experience of these two EVs. The Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus is highlighted as the efficiency benchmark, consistently achieving better miles per kilowatt-hour than the Corsa-e, especially at higher speeds. The Corsa-e, despite its smaller battery and less aerodynamic design, proves surprisingly capable for long distances, completing the journey with two charging stops that were conveniently timed with breaks. The reviewer praises the Corsa-e's value and suitability for everyday use, while reiterating the Tesla's superior efficiency. The video strongly advocates for EV adoption, criticizing comments that hinder progress and emphasizing the minimal inconvenience of charging compared to the environmental benefits. less
New Audi E-tron GT Collection Day Handover Including In-Depth Walkaround Review
The reviewer takes delivery of a new Audi E-tron GT, opting for the standard model over the RS variant. The "Daytona Grey Pearl Effect" pain... moret and standard 20-inch wheels are noted, but the focus quickly shifts to the optional "Sound and Comfort Pack Plus." This package is highlighted as essential, bringing significant upgrades like three-chamber air suspension, premium Bang & Olufsen sound, ambient lighting, parking assistance, dynamic indicators, and matrix headlights. The "Sport Seats Pro" with ventilation and contrast stitching are also praised. After 300 miles, the reviewer finds the ride comfort "epically good" and appreciates the distinctive styling, particularly the rear lights and flanks. Interior highlights include the excellent seats and sound system, though the glossy black plastic and the awkward wireless phone charging cubby are minor drawbacks. Rear passenger space is deemed adequate for four adults, with good ventilation, but headroom can be tight for taller individuals. The boot space is functional, and the powered tailgate is convenient. The reviewer plans extensive testing on range, charging, and efficiency, with a mention of an upcoming appearance at the Electric Vehicles Festival on August 7th. less
Audi E-Tron GT vs Porsche Taycan 4S vs Tesla Model S LRP Convoy Comparison - Efficiency, Range & Review
This video presents a comprehensive convoy comparison of the Audi E-Tron GT, Porsche Taycan 4S, and Tesla Model S Long Range Performance, focusing on ... moreefficiency and range over a 150-mile journey. The reviewer highlights the Tesla's significant advantage in energy efficiency, averaging 252 Wh/mile compared to the Audi's 344 Wh/mile and the Porsche's 317 Wh/mile. While the Taycan and E-Tron GT boast faster charging capabilities due to their 800-volt architecture, the Tesla's superior efficiency means it requires less frequent charging, potentially leveling the playing field on long trips. In terms of driving dynamics, the Porsche Taycan is identified as the sportiest, with sharper steering and a more aggressive feel, while the Audi E-Tron GT offers a slightly more comfortable ride than the Taycan, aided by smaller wheels. The Tesla Model S is praised for its spaciousness, intuitive screen interface, and quiet cabin, though its ride can be less settled over bumps compared to the German rivals. Interior quality is a strong point for the Audi and Porsche, with the Audi's seats, particularly the optional advanced comfort pack with vented and adjustable bolsters, being singled out as the best. App connectivity is decisively won by Tesla. Ultimately, the reviewer finds all three to be excellent vehicles with distinct strengths, making the choice dependent on individual priorities. less
Convoy Comparison: A New Tesla Model 3 Long Range vs. Older Model
This video conducts a thorough convoy comparison between a brand-new Tesla Model 3 Long Range and an 18-month-old model, focusing on real-world effici... moreency, range, charging speed, and cabin noise. The reviewer found minimal differences in cabin noise, with the double-glazed windows of the new model offering little audible improvement over the older one. In terms of efficiency and range, the new model, despite potentially having a larger 82 kWh battery, did not demonstrate a significant advantage over the older model under the tested warm weather conditions. In fact, the older model occasionally showed slightly better efficiency. Performance testing revealed the older Model 3 was marginally faster in acceleration. Charging speed at a V3 Supercharger also favored the older model, which charged to 90% 12 minutes faster. The reviewer concludes that the benefits of the newer battery and double glazing are not substantial in real-world warm conditions, with charging speeds being slower on the new model. less
Unique Porsche Taycan With Full Dirty Martini Wrap! How £23k On Extras Is Spent. Suspension Demo.
This video provides an in-depth introduction to a highly customized Porsche Taycan 4s, notable for its unique 'Dirty Martini' wrap and over ... more£23,000 in optional extras. The reviewer highlights the car's distinctive appearance, intended for promotional use, and details numerous costly additions, from the two-tone leather interior and sports design side skirts to the performance battery plus and rear-axle steering. While initially critical of some seemingly non-standard features like heated seats and charging cables being optional extras, the reviewer's overall impression shifts positively as they experience the car's driving dynamics. The adaptive suspension is praised for its ability to provide both a comfortable ride and a firm, sporty feel, while the rear-wheel steering is noted for enhancing agility. The reviewer is impressed by the car's performance, comparing it favorably to a Tesla Model S P100D, and appreciates the added atmosphere from the optional sports sound. Despite some minor gripes about infotainment intuitiveness and phone placement, the Taycan 4s is ultimately deemed a very impressive and capable vehicle, particularly for long-distance journeys due to its fast charging capabilities. less
Mercedes EQV vs Volkswagen Caravelle: Can the Fully Electric Multi-Seater Van Be Cool?
The reviewer provides a first impression of the Mercedes EQV, positioning it as a unique seven-seater electric vehicle alternative to the popular VW C... morearavelle. While acknowledging its practicality and spaciousness, particularly for family use or conversion into a camper van, the reviewer highlights several drawbacks. The "Sport" trim, while the base model, lacks features like a picnic table found in higher trims. The reviewer also notes the awkwardness of the center console hindering movement to the rear and the manual seat adjustments on their specific model. Despite these points, the EQV is praised for its comfortable driving experience, feeling more like a car than a van, and its instant electric power delivery. A significant positive takeaway is the real-world range, which exceeded expectations, achieving 211 miles on a single trip with 4% battery remaining, suggesting a comfortable 230+ miles in warmer weather. The reviewer is excited about the potential for customization to make the EQV stand out from its common use as an airport taxi. less
Mercedes EQC vs Tesla Model X vs Jaguar I-Pace vs Audi E-Tron 55 - Side by Side Interior Space Comparison
This video provides a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of four premium electric SUVs: the Mercedes EQC, Tesla Model X, Jaguar iPace, and Audi e-t... moreron 55. The reviewer focuses on interior space, practicality, and boot capacity, highlighting key differences. The EQC is praised for its luxurious feel, refined driving experience, and dynamic handling, though its interior space is noted as being slightly smaller than rivals. The Audi e-tron stands out for its refinement, comfort, and exceptionally fast charging speeds, making it ideal for long journeys. The Tesla Model X is lauded as a great all-rounder, offering spaciousness with optional seven seats, strong performance, and the convenience of the Supercharger network. The Jaguar iPace, particularly on the used market, is presented as good value, offering a fun driving experience and a solid all-around package, though it's not the most spacious. Ultimately, the video concludes that all four are excellent choices, with the best fit depending on individual priorities and preferences, emphasizing the growing diversity and quality in the EV SUV market. less
Mercedes EQC 400 Electric SUV In-Depth Review and Opinion From a Tesla Owner
As a seasoned electric vehicle owner, the reviewer offers a balanced perspective on the Mercedes EQC 400 AMG Line. The vehicle impresses with its comf... moreortable ride, quiet cabin, and surprisingly capable handling on country roads, especially in dynamic mode. The interior is praised for its premium feel, quality materials, and supportive seats, with particular highlights being the thigh support adjustment and the excellent Burmester sound system. The augmented reality navigation and unique energizing modes add a touch of innovation. However, criticisms include the lack of front storage (frunk), a slightly dark rear cabin due to the limited glass roof, and a central console prone to scratches. While the real-world range is estimated at around 200 miles (below the 255-mile claim), and charging speeds are decent but not class-leading, the reviewer concludes that the EQC offers a compelling, well-balanced, and premium electric SUV experience, particularly for long-distance comfort, though it feels more compact than rivals like the Tesla Model X or Audi e-tron. less
Automatic Emergency Braking Test vs Tesla S 3 X Audi Etron Jaguar IPace VW Golf City Safety
This video conducts a series of automatic emergency braking (AEB) tests using a cardboard cutout of Elon Musk as a surrogate pedestrian. The reviewer ... morefound that Tesla models (Model X, Model 3, and a 2019 Model S P100D) generally performed well, with the AEB system activating effectively, though with variations in timing and intensity. Notably, the system seemed more proactive when the driver was still on the accelerator. The Audi e-tron 55 Quattro demonstrated effective braking up to 25 mph but failed at higher speeds. The Jaguar I-Pace and a 2015 Tesla Model S showed poor or non-existent AEB functionality, with the reviewer suggesting these systems may not be reliable or functional. The VW Golf GTE's AEB also failed to activate during the tests, despite the reviewer's prior experience with its functionality in other scenarios. Overall, Teslas provided the most consistent AEB performance, while other brands showed significant limitations. less
Polestar 2 Updated Real World Range Test, Charging Speed, Pilot Assist Demo vs Tesla Autopilot Review
The Polestar 2, particularly with the Performance Pack, offers an engaging driving experience, noted for its quick acceleration and responsive handlin... moreg, comparable to a Tesla Model 3 Performance. The reviewer found the February 2021 software update improved efficiency and charging speed compared to previous versions, with real-world range estimates reaching around 228 miles under warm conditions. However, the car's efficiency (averaging 31.8 kWh/100 miles) is still considered less than a Tesla Model 3. Charging speeds, while improved, peaked at 146 kW and dropped significantly at higher states of charge, reaching only 63 kW by 60% battery. A notable frustration was the navigation system's failure to suggest faster charging points, instead prioritizing slower 50 kW chargers. The ride quality with the Performance Pack and large wheels can be firm, and minor issues like dashboard vibrations and limited knee room were mentioned. Despite these drawbacks, the reviewer concludes it's a great car for daily use and occasional trips, though Tesla still holds an edge for frequent long-distance drivers. less
Tesla Model X 75d vs Audi E-tron 55 vs Jaguar I-PACE: £50k 4x4 Electric SUVs Range, Charging, Comfort
This comparison video pits the Tesla Model X 75D, Audi e-tron 55 Quattro, and Jaguar I-PACE EV400 SE against each other in a real-world range and effi... moreciency test. The reviewer highlights that the Tesla Model X 75D, despite having the smallest battery, proved to be the most efficient on the tested route, averaging just under 3 miles per kilowatt-hour. However, its real-world range projection (177 miles) was the lowest. The Audi e-tron 55 Quattro offered the most comfortable ride and the quietest cabin, with a projected range of 210 miles, but was the heaviest and least efficient of the three. The Jaguar I-PACE, while slightly smaller, offered a good balance of comfort, agility, and efficiency (averaging 2.6-2.7 miles per kWh), with a projected range of 218 miles, the highest of the group. Charging speeds varied significantly, with the Audi e-tron demonstrating exceptionally fast charging (90% in 23-24 minutes), the Jaguar I-PACE taking around 45 minutes for 90%, and the Tesla Model X 75D being the slowest at 52 minutes for 90% on a V2 Supercharger. The reviewer notes the Audi's consistent charging profile and the Jaguar's surprisingly sporty handling when not in eco mode. less
Tesla Model 3 LR vs S Long Range Raven Real World Efficiency, Range and Charging Speed Review
This review pits the Tesla Model 3 Long Range Dual Motor against the Tesla Model S Long Range Dual Motor Raven in a real-world efficiency and charging... more speed comparison. The reviewer highlights the Model 3's agility and convenience on country roads, contrasting it with the Model S's superior comfort, refinement, and quietness on the motorway. While the Model S boasts a larger battery (100kWh vs 75kWh) and a higher theoretical range (368 miles vs 277 miles in the test), the Model 3 proved slightly more efficient in real-world conditions, averaging 239 Wh/mile compared to the Model S's 242 Wh/mile. Charging speeds were comparable, with neither car reaching peak potential on V3 Superchargers, but the Model S did regain 200 miles of range faster than the Model 3. Ultimately, the Model S justifies its higher price tag through comfort and range, while the Model 3 offers a more engaging drive and significantly lower cost. less
Audi E-Tron GT RS 600 Mile Road Trip Review Incl Efficiency and Charging Speed Tests
The Audi E-Tron GT RS is presented as a capable, albeit expensive, electric grand tourer, undertaking a 600-mile road trip from Scotland to London. Th... moree reviewer highlights its exceptionally smooth ride, comfortable interior with quality materials, and quiet cabin, making it a strong contender for long-distance cruising. However, criticisms include noticeable tire noise on rougher surfaces, an infotainment system that is less intuitive than competitors like Tesla, and an awkward wireless phone charger placement. The car's weight (over 2.4 tonnes) is felt but managed well by the adaptive air suspension. Charging performance is a mixed bag: while it can achieve impressive peak speeds (up to 264 kW) at 350kW chargers, especially when starting from a low state of charge (2-3%) and in warmer temperatures, the charging speed tapers off significantly after 50% and slows dramatically beyond 80%. Real-world range is estimated between 210-250 miles, falling short of Audi's official claims, with efficiency heavily influenced by ambient temperature and driving conditions. Despite its performance and comfort, the high price point (tested at £135,000) is a significant barrier to justification for the reviewer, who ultimately deems it a fantastic car but hard to justify financially. less
Polestar 2 vs Tesla Model 3 Review by a 5-Year Tesla Owner - Including February 21 Update. Do I Like It?
This review, presented by a five-year Tesla owner, offers a nuanced comparison between the Polestar 2 and the Tesla Model 3, particularly after the Po... morelestar 2 received a significant February 2021 software update. Initially unimpressed, the reviewer finds the updated Polestar 2, specifically the dual-motor variant without the performance pack, to be a more mature and refined car than before, even slightly smoother than a Model 3 Performance. Key improvements noted include more progressive throttle response and enhanced charging and range capabilities. However, the reviewer ultimately still favors the Tesla Model 3 for its superior efficiency, faster charging, and the convenience of the Supercharger network, along with a preferred driving dynamic and cabin feel. The review highlights the Polestar 2's strengths in its premium sound system, comfortable seats with adjustable bases, and a more customizable infotainment system with Google integration and upcoming Apple CarPlay. Conversely, criticisms include a lack of storage, a glossy, scratch-prone center console, and less rear headroom. The reviewer concludes that while the Polestar 2 is a fantastic car, personal preference and specific use cases will determine the better choice, recommending test drives for potential buyers. less
Audi A5 vs Tesla Model 3 - Petrol / Diesel vs Electric Cars. Seriously, Why Would You?
The reviewer strongly advocates for electric vehicles over traditional internal combustion engine cars, using the Audi A5 Sportback as a prime example... more of an outdated choice. While acknowledging the Audi A5 40 TFSI S line as a "good car" with handsome design, solid build quality, and a pleasant interior, the reviewer highlights its significant drawbacks. These include premature wear on the driver's bolster after only 2,500 miles, a cramped rear seating area, and mediocre fuel economy averaging 27 mpg. In stark contrast, the Tesla Model 3 is presented as the superior option, praised for its modern design, minimalist and tech-forward interior with over-the-air updates, spaciousness, and significantly lower running costs (benefit-in-kind tax, servicing, fuel). The reviewer emphasizes the Model 3's superior driving dynamics, responsiveness, quieter ride, and advanced features like Autopilot and a comprehensive mobile app. The core argument is that despite the Audi's merits, the financial and environmental benefits, coupled with the technological advancements of EVs like the Model 3, make purchasing a new petrol car like the A5 unjustifiable in today's market. less
Edinburgh to London Non-Stop in an Electric Car? Tesla Model S Long Range vs 420 Miles
The reviewer attempts a challenging non-stop road trip from Edinburgh to London in a Tesla Model S Long Range (2020 Raven model) with a stated goal of... more over 400 miles on a single charge. The journey, covering 421.1 miles in 7 hours and 53 minutes, was successfully completed with 4% battery remaining, demonstrating the car's impressive range capabilities under specific, efficient driving conditions. The reviewer highlights that achieving this required driving at lower speeds (55-60 mph), utilizing autopilot, and managing climate control carefully, though they did use heating and ventilation. Favorable conditions, including minimal wind and moderate temperatures, played a significant role. While acknowledging this isn't typical real-world driving, the video effectively showcases the potential of modern EVs for long distances. The reviewer praises the car's comfort and refinement over the long duration, noting the adaptive suspension and quiet ride. The primary takeaway is that long-distance EV travel is not a future concept but a present reality, with numerous charging opportunities readily available should a non-stop attempt not be desired. less
My Dad's First Time Driving an Electric Car: A Tesla Model 3 SR+ 500 Miles to Scotland
This video documents an intriguing experiment: a father's first-ever drive in an electric vehicle, a Tesla Model 3 SR+, for a 500-mile road trip ... moreto Scotland, with minimal prior instruction. The reviewer's father found the Tesla surprisingly intuitive, comparing it favorably to rental cars he'd previously driven. He appreciated the minimalist interior, the large central screen for information, and the ease of charging, noting that charging stops often took less time than his own breaks. While initially concerned about finding charging points, the car's navigation system proved effective. He experienced minor issues with voice commands and Bluetooth pairing but found these easily resolvable. The car's comfort, autopilot features, and the overall simplicity of charging (compared to refueling a petrol car) were highlighted as significant positives. The experiment successfully demonstrated that even a novice driver can undertake a long-distance EV journey with confidence, debunking potential anxieties about complexity. less
BMW i3 60Ah REX vs 94Ah vs 120Ah Maximum Range Test Comparison
This video presents a comprehensive real-world range test comparing three BMW i3 models with different battery capacities: the 60Ah, 94Ah, and 120Ah, ... moreall featuring the Range Extender (REX) option except for the 120Ah. The test was conducted in a convoy under mixed driving conditions (city, country, motorway) at ambient temperatures of around 9°C. The 60Ah REX model expired its battery at 75.8 miles, with the REX engine engaging shortly after, allowing it to continue. The 94Ah REX model covered 131 miles before the REX engaged, having used most of its 27kWh usable battery. The 120Ah model, a non-REX version, achieved an impressive 172.7 miles before completely running out of power, though the final few miles saw a sudden loss of power. The reviewer highlights the i3's efficiency and low running costs, especially with cheaper electricity tariffs. While acknowledging the i3 is primarily a city car, it performs adequately on motorways, though comfort and stability might be better in other vehicles. The REX system is noted to engage seamlessly without significant power loss. Overall, the test demonstrates the significant range improvements with larger batteries and the practical utility of the REX for extending journeys. less
Audi E-tron 55 3,000 Mile Review: Charging Experience with Ionity, Instavolt, Shell, and BP vs Tesla
After over 3,000 miles, the reviewer finds the Audi E-tron 55 to be a highly luxurious and practical family SUV, excelling in ride comfort, seat adjus... moretment, and interior refinement, likening it to high-end luxury sedans. The fast charging capability, consistently delivering rapid speeds regardless of battery state, is a significant plus, altering charging habits to be more opportunistic. However, the reviewer notes a lack of storage space in the front cabin and a desire for clearer visual cues indicating it's an electric vehicle. The digital mirrors are functional but can be tricky for distance perception. Real-world range is consistently between 180-230 miles, depending on conditions. The second part of the review addresses charging outside the Tesla network, finding it "reassuringly good" and "simple" with a little research, highlighting Instavolt as the most reliable and user-friendly network, while Ionity is expensive and complex. Overall, the reviewer concludes that non-Tesla EVs are a viable option for long-distance travel, with significant investment in charging infrastructure improving the experience. less