TESLA SEMI: WAS I WRONG? RESPONDING TO YOU

EV Channels Review

John Cadogan revisits his critical stance on the Tesla Semi, addressing viewer comments that suggested he overlooked the weight of traditional diesel powertrains. Cadogan meticulously counters these points, explaining that the weight of removed components (engine, gearbox, fuel tanks) is largely offset by the addition of heavy electric motors, inverters, cooling systems, and structural battery enclosures. He uses examples like the Ford F-150 Lightning and Hyundai Kona EV to illustrate that electric conversions typically increase vehicle weight by more than the battery alone. Cadogan argues that the lack of disclosed Tesla Semi specifications is deliberate, as the data would undermine the company's narrative. He further elaborates on the impracticality of solar charging for a fleet and the complexity and liability issues surrounding interchangeable batteries. Ultimately, Cadogan maintains his skepticism about the Semi's commercial viability due to its increased weight, reduced payload efficiency, and the significant infrastructure challenges, concluding that relying on gut feelings rather than data leads to flawed conclusions.