RSymons “RSEV” is a dedicated channel for electric vehicle enthusiasts, with a particular focus on in-depth reviews and comparisons of major automotive brands. The distributor specializes in analyzing the performance, reliability, and practical aspects of electric cars, offering valuable insights for potential buyers and current owners alike.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Through meticulous testing and detailed explanations, RSymons “RSEV” covers key areas such as battery degradation, maintenance costs, and real-world range. Their content features prominent manufacturers like Tesla, Audi, BMW, and Ford, providing comprehensive guides and comparative analyses to help viewers make informed decisions in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
Self-Parking Cars Tesla v Audi v Ford v BMW - Test and Comparison
This video rigorously tests the self-parking capabilities of four premium electric vehicles: Tesla Model S and 3 (comparing AP1 vs. AP2/FSD), Audi e-tron GT, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT, and BMW i4 M50. The reviewer found the Tesla systems, particularly newer ones with AP2/FSD, to be surprisingly unre...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 210 total titles. Page 7 of 9.
BMW i4 M50 Detailed Review by Tesla Owner. Would I Swap? Side-by-Side Comparison vs Tesla Model 3
The reviewer, a Tesla owner and BMW M enthusiast, provides a detailed comparison of the BMW i4 M50 against the Tesla Model 3 Performance. While acknow... moreledging the i4 M50's strengths, such as its superior ride comfort, refinement, and practicality (especially the hatchback boot), the reviewer finds it compromised due to its shared platform with combustion engine cars. Key criticisms include a slight delay in power delivery compared to the Tesla, less precise steering, a heavier feel, and a lack of the aggressive 'M' character expected from the badge. The reviewer highlights the Tesla's advantages in agility, instant throttle response, charging network, and advanced features like Track Mode. Ultimately, the i4 M50 is deemed a comfortable cruiser and autobahn stormer, suitable for long distances, but the Tesla Model 3 Performance is preferred for its sharper driving dynamics and overall EV prowess. The reviewer expresses a slight disappointment that the i4 M50 doesn't feel more 'M' and maintains his order for the i4, but with reservations. less
BMW i4 M50 Range and Charging Test vs Tesla Model 3 Performance and Porsche Taycan 4S in Cold Weather
This video presents a comprehensive real-world comparison of the BMW i4 M50 against the Tesla Model 3 Performance and Porsche Taycan 4S in cold weathe... morer conditions. The reviewer highlights the i4 M50's comfortable ride and practicality, particularly its hatchback design, positioning it as a strong cruiser. However, the i4 M50 falls short in direct comparison, exhibiting a slight delay in throttle response compared to the Tesla and Taycan, and notably slower charging speeds, especially on longer trips. While the i4 M50 offers a compelling package for many, its charging performance in adverse weather is a significant drawback against its rivals. The reviewer suggests that software updates or warmer conditions might improve its charging capabilities, making it a car to re-evaluate in the future. less
BMW i4 M50 Part 1 - First Impressions. I Drive It Until It Dies. Tesla Model 3 Competitor?
This video offers a candid first impression of the BMW i4 M50, contrasting it with the Tesla Model 3 Performance. The reviewer, a former M car enthusi... moreast, finds the i4 M50 to be a more refined, larger-feeling car, akin to a 5 Series, rather than a direct M3 competitor. While it offers a comfortable and quiet ride, the performance, though quick, lacks the instant responsiveness of the Model 3 due to a noticeable throttle delay. The reviewer also notes the subdued styling compared to traditional M cars. A significant portion of the video is dedicated to an "until it dies" range test in cold weather, which yielded a disappointing 179 miles from a full charge, falling short of predicted figures. Despite the range concerns, the reviewer highlights the car's predictable power reduction as it nears zero, allowing ample time to find a charger. Overall, the i4 M50 is presented as a luxurious cruiser rather than a sharp, sporty EV, appealing to those prioritizing comfort and refinement over outright performance and responsiveness. less
My 2021 Electric Vehicle Awards: Favourite EVs and Features End-of-Year Round Up
This video provides an end-of-year review of favorite electric vehicles and features from 2021. The reviewer highlights standout cars across various c... moreategories, including exterior design (Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Peugeot e-208, Tesla Model S), interior comfort (Audi e-tron GT RS, Mercedes EQS, Mustang Mach-E, Volvo XC40 Recharge), practicality (BMW i3 for its box-fitting ability), driving fun (Porsche Taycan, Tesla Model 3 Performance, Renault Twizy), ride quality (Porsche Taycan, Audi e-tron GT, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Mercedes EQS), headlights (Mercedes EQV, Polestar, Audi e-tron GT), charging speed (Porsche Taycan, Audi e-tron GT, Audi e-tron 55, Tesla Model 3/Y), user interface (Mustang Mach-E, Polestar, Tesla), efficiency (Hyundai Kona, Kia Niro, original Honda Ioniq, Tesla Model 3 Standard Range), real-world range (Tesla Model S Long Range), and app connectivity (Tesla). The overall winner for the best all-rounder is the Tesla Model 3 Standard Range (LFP battery), praised for its efficiency, low running costs, standard equipment, and access to the Supercharger network. The reviewer expresses excitement for new models and increased choice in 2022, advocating for the widespread adoption of EVs. less
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Review. Don't Ask Me If I Prefer The Tesla Model Y.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance has successfully converted the reviewer, who was previously lukewarm on the model. The "GT Performance&quo... moret; trim significantly elevates the vehicle, boasting a lower, meaner aesthetic, enhanced styling, and a more aggressive stance. The interior is praised for its premium materials, comfortable and supportive seats, and an intuitive, easy-to-use large screen, offering a more plush experience than the Tesla Model Y. Dynamically, the Mach-E GT Performance delivers a "serious pace" with ample torque, exciting acceleration that can even cause the front wheels to scrabble for grip, and a "sense of occasion" that feels more emotional than its Tesla counterpart. The steering is noted as having more feel and a pleasant weight, while the adaptive damping (MagnaRide) provides a good balance between sporty handling on winding roads and a comfortable, refined ride on the highway. The reviewer highlights the car's sporting edge, with growling noises and strong acceleration, but also appreciates its ability to switch to a quiet, calm mode for cruising. Minor criticisms include a hard plastic trim piece and the lack of a sunglasses holder, but overall, the reviewer is highly impressed and avoids directly comparing it to the Tesla Model Y Performance, suggesting it carves out its own distinct, desirable identity. less
Tesla Model S Plaid: Detailed Walkaround Tour and Charge Speeds
The Tesla Model S Plaid is presented as a significantly revised vehicle, not just a performance upgrade. Reviewers highlight extensive changes to the ... moreinterior, including more space, a lower dashboard for better visibility, and refined door inserts. The exterior also sees subtle but impactful modifications, such as a wider stance and optimized aerodynamics for cooling and performance. The Plaid's acceleration is described as "violent" and "lethal," exceeding previous performance models significantly, with a linear power delivery even at high speeds. While the ride comfort is praised, the reviewer notes the controversial yoke steering wheel, which, despite initial reservations, becomes natural with use due to its design. Criticisms include the user interface's complexity, with some functions requiring multiple steps, and the visual disparity between the two displays. Charging speeds are impressive, reaching over 200 kW initially and declining gradually. Overall, the Model S Plaid is deemed a "phenomenal car" with "bragging rights out of this world," offering a brutally fast and impressive driving experience, though the reviewer suggests the normal Long Range might suffice for most. less
Mercedes EQS 450+ Review and Range Test - Does Electric Fit Perfectly With Luxury?
The Mercedes EQS 450+ is presented as a luxurious electric successor to the S-Class, and the reviewer largely finds it lives up to expectations. The v... moreehicle excels in providing a serene, quiet, and comfortable driving experience, effectively insulating occupants from the outside world. Key highlights include the impressive rear-wheel steering, which aids maneuverability, and the advanced augmented reality navigation overlay. The reviewer praises the electric drivetrain's suitability for a luxury car, noting its smooth, silent, and effortless power delivery, especially on winding roads. However, criticisms are leveled at the brake pedal feel, described as 'dead' and lacking confidence-inspiring initial bite, and the somewhat uninspired exterior design, particularly the wing mirrors. Despite these points, the reviewer concludes that the EQS is a superb and exceptionally relaxing car to be in, making it a strong contender in the luxury EV segment. Real-world range is estimated to be around 313 miles from the 108 kWh battery, with potential for over 350-400 miles under ideal conditions. less
Rivian R1T Part 2 - Driven! Off Road Demonstration And 0-60 Launch
The Rivian R1T is showcased as an exceptionally versatile electric pickup, excelling in both off-road capability and on-road performance. The reviewer... more highlights its impressive ground clearance, advanced suspension, and sophisticated traction control system, which allow it to navigate challenging terrain with ease. The quad-motor setup provides immense power, enabling a surprisingly quick 0-60 mph time of 3.2 seconds, even on all-terrain tires. The interior features and user interface are praised for their attention to detail and functionality, including multiple camera views that aid in both off-roading and parking. While the vehicle's size is noted as a potential challenge in certain markets like the UK, the reviewer concludes that the R1T redefines expectations for pickup trucks, offering a compelling blend of luxury, capability, and performance. less
Tesla Model Y Standard Range 7 Seater Review, Efficiency and Range Test. Not As Spacious As Model X
The reviewer provides a comprehensive look at the Tesla Model Y Standard Range 7-Seater during a trip to Los Angeles. While praising its familiar driv... moreing dynamics, sharp steering, and ease of use, particularly the infotainment and charging, the review highlights significant drawbacks. The third-row seating is deemed extremely cramped, suitable only for children on short journeys and a considerable downgrade from the Model X. The boot space is also compromised in the 7-seater configuration. Real-world range is estimated at just over 200 miles in warm weather with traffic, which is considered decent but not class-leading. The ride quality is noted as firm and occasionally crashy, a sentiment echoed by other EV experts. Ultimately, while the Model Y remains a practical and efficient family EV with excellent charging, the 7-seater version is not a viable replacement for the Model X, and competition is rapidly closing the gap. less
New Battery! Tesla Model 3 Standard Plus with 60kwh LFP. Range, Efficiency and Charging Review. SR+
The reviewer provides an in-depth analysis of the updated Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus, highlighting its new 60kWh LFP battery as a key different... moreiator. The LFP battery allows for daily 100% charging, a significant departure from previous recommendations. Despite a slight decrease in 0-60mph time (5.8s vs 5.2s), the reviewer finds the car's real-world efficiency to be exceptional, achieving figures as low as 188 Wh/mile (5.3 miles/kWh) in mixed driving conditions, suggesting a potential real-world range exceeding 290 miles. Charging speeds on a V3 Supercharger are also impressive, reaching 169 kW and adding 200 miles of range in 30 minutes. Positives include the standard heat pump, heated steering wheel and rear seats, and the engaging rear-wheel-drive driving dynamics. Criticisms are minor, focusing on cold feet from the climate control on 'auto', lack of illuminated door handles, and a slightly fidgety ride, though the reviewer ultimately deems the car "epically good" and hard to fault. less
Kia EV6 GT Line S AWD Owner Review: Great Car But A Few Teething Issues To Resolve
The reviewer expresses strong overall satisfaction with the Kia EV6 GT Line S AWD, praising its striking design, comfortable ride, excellent build qua... morelity, and innovative technology, particularly the head-up display and lane-keeping assist. The spacious interior, generous boot space, and long warranty are also highlighted as significant positives. However, the review details several "teething issues" that detract from an otherwise excellent package. These include problems with wireless Apple CarPlay functionality, dated infotainment graphics, an unintuitive climate control system, and a concerning heater failure experienced by the reviewer and other owners. Practical concerns are raised about the vulnerable charging flap design and the automatic tailgate's tendency to open unexpectedly. Charging speeds, while respectable at around 140-150 kW, do not consistently reach the advertised 250 kW peak, especially in colder temperatures. The reviewer also notes the lane assist defaulting to 'on' with each drive as an annoyance. Despite these issues, the reviewer maintains a positive outlook, believing Kia will address these problems, and recommends the car, especially for early adopters willing to overlook initial bugs. less
EV Range and Recharge Race: Kia EV6 vs Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model 3 vs VW ID.4
This comprehensive comparison evaluates five leading family EVs on efficiency and charging speed under cold weather conditions. The Tesla Model 3 (sta... morending in for the Model Y) emerged as the most efficient, offering excellent range and ease of charging via the Tesla network. The Kia EV6 impressed with its strong all-round performance, finishing the 90% recharge race first and demonstrating capable charging speeds despite the cold, though it was slightly less efficient than the Tesla. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, despite its large battery, showed disappointing efficiency and a significant drop-off in charging speed after 80%, limiting its rapid charging potential. The VW ID.4 and Hyundai Ioniq 5 offered comfortable rides and respectable performance, with the Ioniq 5 showing potential for faster charging in warmer conditions. Overall, the Tesla Model 3 is highlighted for its efficiency and ease of use for long journeys, while the Kia EV6 is praised as a strong, comfortable all-rounder with impressive charging capabilities. less
Big Box and Practicality Test - Kia EV6 vs VW ID.4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E (and a bit of Ioniq 5, BMW i3, Tesla)
This video conducts a practical comparison of the Kia EV6, VW ID.4, and Ford Mustang Mach-E, focusing on interior space for five adults and cargo capa... morecity with a large box. The reviewer found the Kia EV6 to offer the most comfortable rear seating for three adults, despite having slightly less headroom than others. In terms of boot space, the VW ID.4 was deemed the most practical, particularly for its depth and height, easily accommodating the large test box. The Ford Mustang Mach-E was noted as having the smallest boot and less comfortable rear seating. The video also briefly touches upon the practicality of the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Tesla Model X, Model S, Model 3, BMW i3, and a BMW 3 Series for context, highlighting the i3's surprising van-like cargo capacity. Overall, the Kia EV6 excels in passenger comfort, while the VW ID.4 leads in cargo volume. less
Kia EV6 vs Volkswagen ID.4 Convoy Comparison Review: 77kWh Family Electric Cars
This video presents a convoy comparison between the Kia EV6 GT Line S AWD and the Volkswagen ID.4 (2WD), both equipped with 77kWh usable batteries, to... more determine real-world range and efficiency. The review highlights that both vehicles performed identically on the tested 140-mile route, achieving an estimated 250 miles of range under the given conditions (approximately 15°C, driving at 70 mph in normal mode, later switching to eco mode). The reviewer found the EV6 to be a comfortable, quiet, and relaxed car to drive, feeling more like a conventional car than an SUV, despite its crossover classification. While the EV6 offers slightly more punch and a more advanced driver-assist system that allows for more lane centering flexibility compared to the ID.4, the reviewer notes the ID.4 feels more like a traditional SUV with a higher seating position. Both cars are praised for their ride quality and insulation. The reviewer also briefly touches on the Tesla Model Y and Hyundai Ioniq 5, suggesting the EV6 was slightly more efficient than the Ioniq 5 on this journey, but less so than the Tesla Model Y. less
Brand New Kia EV6 GT Line S AWD Collection and First Impressions. Unboxing a New Car! Yacht Blue
The reviewer takes delivery of a brand new Kia EV6 GT Line S in Yacht Blue, highlighting its attractive color and premium feel. The GT Line S is posit... moreioned as the top-tier model until a faster version arrives next year, featuring a 77kWh battery and dual-motor AWD. First impressions are largely positive, with the reviewer noting the comfortable vegan leather and suede interior, Meridian sound system, and a smooth, quiet ride. While sharing DNA with the Hyundai Ioniq 5, the EV6 offers a slightly firmer suspension and steering setup, along with potentially faster charging and a larger usable battery. The reviewer praises the effortless acceleration and the convenience of features like the head-up display and indicator-activated side cameras. However, criticisms include the infotainment system's graphics, which feel dated, and the active sound feature, which is described as a drone. The reviewer also notes the lane assist can be overly sensitive on narrow UK roads. The car's size is well-managed, feeling like a normal saloon despite its dimensions, offering ample rear legroom. A real-world range test against the VW ID4 is planned for a future video. less
Heat Pump Difference? Tesla Model 3 700 Mile Convoy New vs Old Efficiency Comparison!
This video presents a compelling real-world efficiency comparison between a 2020 pre-refresh Tesla Model 3 Long Range and a 2021 refresh Model 3 Long ... moreRange over a 700-mile journey through Wales. The primary focus is the impact of the heat pump and wheel differences on efficiency in colder conditions (around 4-12°C). The reviewer found that the 2021 model, equipped with a heat pump and 19-inch wheels, was notably more efficient, averaging 264 Wh/mile compared to the 2020 model's 308 Wh/mile over the entire trip. However, a surprising finding was that the older, pre-refresh model charged faster at V2 and V3 Superchargers, a phenomenon the reviewer has observed before and attributes to different thermal management or charging profiles, despite both cars theoretically having the same battery pack. The reviewer praises the Model 3's driving dynamics on scenic Welsh roads, highlighting its nimbleness and instant power, though noting the ride can be firm. The overall conclusion is that while the newer model offers better efficiency, the older model's faster charging and still-respectable efficiency make it a very capable car. The lack of fast chargers in Wales is also highlighted as a significant limitation for EV travel in the region. less
PHEV Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles - Best or Worst of Both Worlds? 2 Year MPG Revealed GTE vs Volt
This video provides a two-year ownership review of two Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs): the Chevrolet Volt (Vauxhall Ampera in the UK) and th... moree Volkswagen Golf GTE. The reviewer highlights that PHEVs can serve as an excellent 'gateway drug' to full electric vehicles, offering a taste of electric driving without range anxiety. The Chevrolet Volt is praised for its reliability, a real-world electric-only range of 30-45 miles (sometimes exceeding 50), and a smooth, quiet driving experience, though its CVT-like gearbox can be unrefined under hard acceleration. The Golf GTE offers a sportier driving experience in GTE mode, combining its petrol engine and electric motor, but its electric-only range is significantly less, typically 15-25 miles. The reviewer emphasizes that the true economy of PHEVs is entirely dependent on user behavior, specifically the frequency of plugging them in. When regularly charged, impressive MPG figures (87 MPG for the Volt over 66,000 miles, and 300 MPG for the Golf over a recent 900-mile period) are achievable, making them more economical than traditional ICE vehicles. However, if not plugged in, their economy is only marginally better than standard petrol cars. The video concludes that while PHEVs have their place, especially for those transitioning to EVs, the ultimate simplicity and efficiency lie in fully electric vehicles. less
Driving a Porsche Taycan 600 Miles in a Day. Is This EV Good for Long Distance?
This video documents a 600-mile journey undertaken in a Porsche Taycan 4S, aiming to assess its long-distance capability and charging convenience. The... more reviewer, Richard Symons, concludes that electric cars, and specifically the Taycan, are more than capable of handling such distances with surprising ease. Despite driving aggressively and not prioritizing efficiency, the total charging time for the entire 600+ mile trip was an impressive 47 minutes. The Taycan 4S, equipped with the performance battery and larger wheels, demonstrated exceptionally fast charging, adding 50% battery in approximately 11-12 minutes at 350kW chargers. While the reviewer noted that a five-year-old Tesla Model S P90D was slightly more efficient under similar conditions, the Taycan's comfort, quietness, and rapid charging capabilities make it a superb grand tourer. The reviewer emphasizes that the common criticism of EVs being inconvenient for long distances is largely unfounded with modern vehicles. less
Hyundai Ioniq 5 Project 45 Review With Likes and Dislikes Plus Comparisons with Tesla Model 3 and Y
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 Project 45 is lauded for its distinctive and bold design, with the satin metallic paint and pixelated lights being particular high... morelights. The reviewer appreciates the spacious interior, offering more headroom and a more comfortable seating position than the Tesla Model 3, along with practical features like heated/ventilated seats and reclining rear seats. The car's driving dynamics are described as comfortable with a softer ride than the Model 3, and its performance is deemed strong. Charging speed is a significant positive, capable of reaching over 200 kW and achieving 5-55% charge in just 11 minutes. However, the reviewer notes several drawbacks: the infotainment software feels dated and slow, the extensive use of grey plastic detracts from the premium feel, and the cooled seats are excessively cold on their lowest setting. The automatic door handles staying extended when unlocked and the finicky automatic tailgate/walk-away locking system are also points of frustration. Real-world range is estimated at 200-250 miles, with higher consumption at speed. Despite these criticisms, the overall verdict is highly positive, positioning the Ioniq 5 as a comfortable, spacious, and different family vehicle that is more comfortable and charges faster than a Tesla Model 3, though Tesla offers a more seamless charging experience. less
Tesla Model Y for the UK at Last! Prices, Specifications, Wait Time…
The Tesla Model Y is finally available for order in the UK, with pricing and specifications detailed. The reviewer notes two primary configurations: L... moreong Range and Performance. The Long Range model, priced at £54,990, offers a claimed 315 miles of range and a 0-60 mph time of 4.8 seconds. The Performance model, at £64,990, increases top speed to 150 mph and reduces 0-60 mph to 3.5 seconds, but comes with a slightly reduced range (298 miles) due to larger wheels and a firmer ride. A significant point of criticism for the Model Y, even on the 19-inch wheels of the Long Range, is its uncomfortably firm and fidgety ride quality, especially on UK roads. The reviewer expresses a strong desire for a more comfortable suspension, perhaps even air suspension, and finds the £10,000 premium for the Performance model hard to justify given the ride quality concerns and limited UK speed limits. Deliveries for the Long Range are expected in early 2022, originating from Shanghai, with Berlin-produced models featuring new battery technology anticipated later in 2022. The reviewer has ordered a Long Range model but questions how long they will keep it due to the ride. Despite the ride issues, the Model Y is acknowledged as a practical, spacious, and popular all-rounder, expected to hold its value well in the current EV market. less
7 Seater EV Comparison: Tesla X100d vs Mercedes EQV Real World Range and Efficiency Comparison
This comparison pits the Tesla Model X 100d against the Mercedes EQV, highlighting their differences as family EVs. While the Model X is praised for i... morets car-like driving dynamics, quickness, and advanced software, the EQV is recognized as a highly practical, spacious van capable of accommodating seven people and significant luggage, even for camping. The reviewer notes the EQV's van-like ride, particularly on the front axle over bumps, and its less engaging driving experience compared to the Model X. However, the EQV's adjustable regen via steering wheel paddles is a standout feature. In terms of real-world range, the Tesla Model X achieved approximately 252 miles on a full charge under mixed driving conditions (including motorways, A-roads, and town driving with air conditioning use and hilly terrain), while the Mercedes EQV managed around 226 miles. Although the Tesla is more efficient, the EQV's practicality and space make it a compelling option for those prioritizing utility over performance, especially in the absence of new Model X availability. less
Audi E-Tron GT 1,000 Mile Review - What I Like and Don't Like (vs Tesla Model S and Porsche Taycan)
The reviewer, after nearly 1,000 miles with the Audi E-Tron GT, has decided to sell the car, despite generally loving it. Key positives include its st... moreriking looks, which the reviewer prefers over the Porsche Taycan, and exceptional ride comfort, comparable to luxury saloons thanks to the air suspension. The interior is praised for its excellent, highly adjustable heated and ventilated seats, and the separate, intuitive climate controls are highlighted as superior to the Taycan's system. Charging speeds are described as phenomenal, capable of adding significant range in very short times. Practicality is also noted, with comfortable rear seats and a ski hatch. However, the reviewer cites several drawbacks: the high price and the resulting preciousness about parking, the boot not being a hatchback (making it less practical than a Tesla Model S for bulky items), awkward placement of charge ports, a less appealing front grille, a transmission tunnel hindering rear-seat space, and a fiddly center console storage area. The Audi interface is deemed functional but not brilliant, and the reviewer notes the car's low front overhang as a potential damage risk. While the E-Tron GT offers a comfortable and stylish experience, its practicality and certain design elements lead to the decision to part with it. less
Hyundai Ioniq 5 Road Trip: 500 Miles in a Day Cross-Country, Efficiency and Charging Tested
This video documents a 500-mile road trip from Edinburgh to Bournemouth in the Hyundai Ioniq 5, focusing on its real-world efficiency and charging cap... moreabilities. The reviewer, initially skeptical of Hyundai's design, finds the Ioniq 5 to be an interesting and well-built vehicle, particularly praising its comfortable "business lounge"-like seats. The real-world range achieved was approximately 230 miles on a full charge, falling short of manufacturer claims but deemed acceptable given the driving conditions and a 73kWh battery. The charging speed is highlighted as a significant strength, with a 42-minute stop from 5% to 99% being particularly impressive, allowing for a quick top-up. While the reviewer notes some minor annoyances with the lane assist system and acknowledges that efficiency drops at higher speeds, the overall verdict is positive, deeming the Ioniq 5 a very capable long-distance EV with incredible charging speed. less
A Week Living in My Mercedes EQV Electric Van With My Family - Am I Crazy? Is It a Good Camper?
This video documents a week-long family camping trip in a Mercedes EQV electric van, exploring its practicality as a mobile living space. The reviewer... more highlights the van's spaciousness and adaptability, noting modifications like an awning rail and window blinds that enhance the camping experience. Key positives include the ability to use heating and air conditioning without engine noise, the comfortable ride, and effective regenerative braking, especially on hills. The large 100kWh battery is deemed sufficient for extended use, providing ample range even with accessories running. However, the reviewer points out the lack of integrated charging infrastructure at many tourist locations in areas like the Cotswolds and Malverns as a significant drawback for EV campers. Charging experiences were mixed, with some public chargers requiring phone calls for remote restarts and not always being readily available or contactless. Despite these charging inconveniences and a minor critique about the tailgate controls and ride on bumpy roads, the overall verdict is highly positive, praising the EQV as a comfortable, practical, and enjoyable electric campervan, especially for families, with a surprisingly low running cost of around £20 for the week's charging. less