Metz Tech is a dedicated channel for enthusiasts of automotive technology, with a distinct focus on electric vehicles (EVs).
This distributor delves into comprehensive reviews, comparisons, and practical insights into the latest EV models, particularly those from Tesla and Chevrolet. Viewers can expect in-depth explorations of features, performance analyses, and advice on purchasing decisions, making Metz Tech an invaluable resource for anyone interested in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
This distributor delves into comprehensive reviews, comparisons, and practical insights into the latest EV models, particularly those from Tesla and Chevrolet. Viewers can expect in-depth explorations of features, performance analyses, and advice on purchasing decisions, making Metz Tech an invaluable resource for anyone interested in the evolving landscape of electric mobility.
One Year With My 2022 Bolt EUV - Do I Regret It?
After one year of ownership, the 2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV 1LT presents a mixed bag for the reviewer. While praised for its cost-effective charging, ample storage space for gear, and innovative features like the shift-by-wire pad and one-pedal driving, significant drawbacks have emerged. The review...
Latest Additions
Showing 24 of 56 total titles. Page 2 of 3.
FSD 12.5.5.2 on the Cybertruck is Rough...
The reviewer tests Tesla's FSD 12.5.5.2 on the Cybertruck, finding the system's performance to be "rough" and in some instances, w... moreorse than previous versions. Key issues identified include the Cybertruck frequently drifting into oncoming lanes, particularly during turns, and exhibiting awkward or overly aggressive braking. The reviewer notes that while the system did improve in some areas, such as smoother steering during turns and better handling of a complex unprotected left turn, the tendency to enter oncoming traffic lanes, even without other vehicles present, is a significant concern, deemed "on the unsafe side" and "cybertruck specific." Speed control also remains an issue, with the system driving too fast on slower roads and too slow on quicker ones. Despite these flaws, the reviewer concludes that FSD in the Cybertruck is not unusable or necessarily unsafe in most cases, but it lacks naturalness and doesn't seem to fully account for the vehicle's size, leading to a slightly nerve-wracking driving experience compared to other Tesla models. less
Can Full Self-Driving on the Cybertruck Handle City Traffic?
This video puts Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta to the test in a Tesla Cybertruck, navigating both highway and complex city traffic. The rev... moreiewer highlights several key observations: the system's tendency to wiggle the steering wheel during turns, occasional issues with cutting too close to oncoming lanes, and a notable slowness in certain situations. However, the FSD also demonstrated impressive capabilities, smoothly handling lane changes, construction zones, and weaving through traffic with minimal intervention. A significant positive was the absence of aggressive braking, a common complaint in earlier FSD versions. While the Cybertruck's steer-by-wire system seems to require further refinement with FSD, the overall performance in challenging urban environments was deemed "very well" handled, with only a few minor disengagements required for safety or to navigate unusual obstacles like a flagger standing too close to the road. The reviewer concludes that FSD on the Cybertruck is performing smoothly, especially in comparison to earlier builds, and is continuously improving. less
Full Self-Driving for the Cybertruck Is Here! First Drive 12.5.5
The reviewer expresses excitement about the arrival of Full Self-Driving (FSD) 12.5.1 on the Tesla Cybertruck, marking its first appearance and the de... morebut of end-to-end highway FSD for the model. Initial impressions highlight improved visualizations and a generally smooth operation, particularly in complex scenarios like parking lots with pedestrians and carts. The system demonstrated patience and caution, successfully navigating construction zones and roundabouts. However, the reviewer notes several areas for improvement: aggressive braking at initial stop signs, occasional hesitation and indecisiveness in turns, and a tendency to be overly timid or slow on certain roads, leading to awkwardness. The reviewer also points out that the Cybertruck's size isn't always accounted for in sharper turns, sometimes staying in the oncoming lane too long. Despite these critiques, the reviewer is impressed with the early version, especially given the lack of critical interventions during a 45-minute test drive, and anticipates rapid evolution with future updates. less
FSD Has Never Done This Before
The reviewer tests FSD 12.5.1.3, noting several improvements over previous versions. The system demonstrates smoother acceleration and braking, more d... moreecisive lane changes, and better handling of construction zones and complex intersections. A significant positive is the system's ability to maintain speed limits more consistently, a departure from previous versions that often exceeded them. However, the review is marred by a critical system error that caused FSD to abort, leading to a temporary loss of autopilot functionality and a scary moment for the driver. Despite this, the reviewer emphasizes the overall peaceful and predictable driving experience, highlighting the potential for drivers to "zone out" and relax. The video also touches on other software updates like YouTube Music and ambient lighting fixes. The reviewer concludes that FSD 12.5.1.3 represents an iterative improvement, though the critical system error remains a significant concern. less
Volkswagen Made Some Changes Is The ID.4 Worth It Now?
The 2024 Volkswagen ID.4 Pro S AWD receives a mixed but largely positive review, addressing key criticisms from previous model years. The reviewer hig... morehlights significant improvements in the infotainment system, noting it's now much more responsive and fluid, though the graphics package is considered a step back. Power has been increased to 335 horsepower, offering a noticeable boost over prior versions, though it's still not considered competitive with some other EVs in its price bracket for sheer acceleration. The reviewer praises the comfortable and highly customizable seats, particularly the inclusion of massaging, heating, and ventilation. Downsides mentioned include the continued use of gloss black plastic and touch-capacitive buttons, the removal of power-folding mirrors, and the lack of a 360-degree camera. Despite its premium price point (around $57,000 before tax credits), the reviewer concludes that the 2024 ID.4 has fixed most of the issues that previously deterred them, making it a worthy EV to consider. less
FSD 12.5.1.1 Feels Like a Regression
The reviewer evaluates Tesla's FSD 12.5.1.1 software, noting a perceived regression in smoothness compared to previous versions, particularly in ... moreacceleration and stopping. While the initial installation was problematic, the reviewer highlights specific instances of rough acceleration, stuttering stops, and an unnerving stop directly on train tracks. However, the software also demonstrated improvements, such as better handling of a hidden stop sign and a flashing red light that was previously problematic. The reviewer also notes the system's tendency to ignore road closure signs and attempt to navigate through them, a behavior that persists. Despite some rough patches and a less-than-smooth experience compared to 12.5.1, the reviewer acknowledges that first drives on new versions can be rough and plans further testing. The review also briefly touches on a Tesla-branded detailing kit and the use of a new roof camera angle. less
FSD 12.5.1 Blew Me Away!!
The reviewer is highly impressed with Tesla's FSD 12.5.1 update, highlighting its significantly improved smoothness and efficiency compared to pr... moreevious versions. Key improvements noted include more decisive lane changes, smoother handling of complex intersections, and a more human-like approach to driving, exemplified by a polite gesture to let another car out. The reviewer also points out that FSD 12.5.1 successfully navigated an unprotected left turn with a middle lane, a maneuver that previous versions struggled with. While acknowledging some aggressive and even illegal maneuvers (like using the shoulder to turn), the overall sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, describing the system as "safe but aggressive and efficient." The reviewer concludes that the system is now "almost boring" in its competence during city driving, a testament to its reliability and reduced need for interventions. less
Taking an FSD Hater on His First Drive!
This video features a first-time extended drive of Tesla's FSD 12.5 with a self-proclaimed FSD skeptic, Colin. The reviewer highlights FSD's... more progress, noting its smooth operation in everyday driving, including navigating four-way stops and complex intersections. Key observations include FSD's tendency to drive assertively, sometimes exceeding speed limits with the 'automatic speed offset' feature, which raises efficiency and legal concerns. The system's ability to handle unpredictable situations, like cars not following right-of-way rules, is praised as human-like. However, the reviewer points out unnatural behaviors, such as excessive slowing for turns, and the system's inability to reverse, leading to 'fidgeting' in parking lots. The auto-wiper functionality is deemed unreliable. Despite some 'weirdness' and the need for human supervision, the overall sentiment is that FSD is significantly improving and remains unique in its end-to-end capability, though it's still a beta product and not suitable for falling asleep. The reviewer expresses confidence in Tesla's iterative development process, even acknowledging potential risks with AI-driven decision-making. less
Let's Stress Test FSD 12.5!
This video stress-tests Tesla's FSD 12.5 in a 2024 Model 3, focusing on challenging scenarios like detours, roundabouts, and city traffic. The re... moreviewer notes improvements in smoothness compared to previous versions, particularly in handling roundabouts and general city driving, with fewer jarring stops. However, FSD 12.5 still struggles significantly with road closure signs, repeatedly attempting to navigate through them or getting stuck in parking lots. A critical failure occurred when the system failed to stop for a red light, requiring immediate driver intervention. While FSD 12.5 demonstrates better handling of speed bumps and some pedestrian interactions, its inability to reliably interpret road closure signs and the critical red light failure highlight areas needing substantial improvement. The reviewer concludes that while FSD is progressing, it still requires significant development, especially regarding road signage and critical safety situations. less
FSD 12.5 Is So Good! Near Perfect First Drive
This video provides an in-depth first drive of Tesla's FSD v12.5, highlighting significant improvements in smoothness and natural driving behavio... morer compared to previous versions. The reviewer is particularly impressed with the system's ability to handle complex scenarios like merging, navigating stop signs with stop-and-go traffic, and executing unprotected left turns with confidence and precision. The reviewer notes that many previous issues, such as hesitant lane changes and jerky movements, appear to be resolved. While the current version excels at core driving tasks, the reviewer expresses anticipation for upcoming features like reverse driving, FSD on Cybertruck, and enhanced highway Autopilot capabilities, which are expected in future 12.5x updates. Despite a minor hiccup with a closed road scenario, the overall verdict is overwhelmingly positive, with the reviewer finding the system to be remarkably intuitive and reliable, allowing for a hands-off driving experience. less
Is the 2024 Chevy Silverado EV RST Worth $96,000? Full Review
The 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV RST, priced at $96,000, presents a compelling, albeit expensive, entry into the electric truck market. The reviewer hi... moreghlights its aggressive styling, massive 24-inch wheels, and adaptive air suspension as key aesthetic and functional features. The innovative Multi-Flex tailgate and Midgate system are praised for their exceptional utility and customization, offering significant advantages over competitors like the Cybertruck in terms of truck-like functionality. The interior boasts ample passenger space and a large infotainment screen powered by Google, though the reviewer expresses disappointment with the material quality for the price point, noting an abundance of hard plastics. Performance is strong, with 754 horsepower and an estimated 440-mile range, but the reviewer found the acceleration, particularly the steering wheel fight during hard acceleration, less refined than expected, especially when compared to the Tesla Cybertruck. A significant drawback noted was the Super Cruise system failing to engage during the test. Ultimately, while the Silverado EV RST excels in practicality and utility, its high price and interior material shortcomings are notable criticisms. less
Fsd Is Hands-Free!! | Fsd 12.4.3 Test Drive
The reviewer tests FSD v12.4.3 on a 2024 Tesla Model 3, reporting a significantly improved and "totally hands-free" experience compared to p... morerevious versions. Key improvements noted include smoother lane changes, more decisive turning, and better handling of unprotected left turns. The reviewer highlights the elimination of the need to touch the scroll wheel, a major step towards true hands-free operation. While the system generally performed well, a minor intervention was required to give more space to an emergency vehicle, indicating a need for enhanced awareness of such situations. Auto Park also showed noticeable improvements in speed and responsiveness. Despite some minor hesitations and a brief instance of stopping unnecessarily, the overall verdict is highly positive, with the reviewer impressed by the system's performance across various driving conditions and encouraging user engagement in the comments. less
Life With a Cybertruck | 2024 Tesla Cybertruck In-depth Review
The 2024 Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast is an undeniably polarizing vehicle, both in its radical design and its performance capabilities. The reviewer hi... moreghlights its "ungodly fast" acceleration, particularly in "Beast mode," which delivers an exhilarating, albeit potentially uncomfortable, experience for passengers. Despite its immense size, the steer-by-wire system and four-wheel steering contribute to surprising nimbleness, making it feel more manageable than expected. However, the reviewer points out significant practical challenges, including its sheer width making parking and navigating tight spaces difficult, necessitating a 360-degree camera system that is currently lacking. The massive single windshield wiper is effective but comically large, and while the stainless steel exterior cleans up well with simple soap and water, its angular design is a constant conversation starter. The interior is praised for its premium materials and unique, angular aesthetic, mirroring the exterior's theme. While the Cyberbeast offers impressive utility with its bed, frunk, and power outlets, its high price point and substantial size make it a niche vehicle, best suited for those who truly need a truck and embrace Tesla's unconventional approach. less
Taking Delivery of a Cyberbeast!
The reviewer documents the exciting delivery of his father's Tesla Cybertruck Cyberbeast, a vehicle with a 5-year reservation history. The Cyberb... moreeast trim is highlighted for its tri-motor setup, boasting over 800 horsepower and rapid acceleration (0-60 in 2.6 seconds). Initial impressions upon delivery noted significant panel gaps and a dirty exterior, though the overall design is described as polarizing yet cool and unique. The driving experience is a major focus, with the reviewer experiencing the "standard" acceleration mode and finding the steer-by-wire system highly sensitive and requiring adjustment. While the power is immense, the reviewer notes that "Beast Mode" offers the ultimate acceleration. The ride is described as smooth but can be bumpy, and tire noise is noticeable. The reviewer emphasizes the Cybertruck's status as an "interaction magnet," drawing significant attention and positive reactions from the public. Despite the unconventional design, the experience of riding in and driving the vehicle seems to soften initial aesthetic criticisms for many. The reviewer plans a full review soon, promising more Cybertruck content. less
Putting Tesla's AutoPark to the Test!
Metz Tech puts Tesla's AutoPark system to the test, comparing it favorably against other EVs' self-parking features. The reviewer highlights... more Tesla's system's ability to identify numerous parking spots, even in wide-open areas, and its user-friendly interface that allows selection of any available spot. While acknowledging that AutoPark is tied to the costly Full Self-Driving package, the reviewer praises its precision and effectiveness in various scenarios, including tight parallel and perpendicular parking between other vehicles. Key criticisms include the system's mandatory reverse-in parking, which can hinder trunk access, and the lack of ultrasonic sensors, though Tesla's vision-based system performs well. The reviewer also notes that the parking speed can be slow, but ultimately deems it the best AutoPark system currently available due to its fluidity and integration with FSD. less
GM's Super Cruise vs. Tesla's Full Self Driving 2024
This video provides a detailed comparison between GM's Super Cruise and Tesla's Autopilot/Full Self-Driving (FSD) systems, focusing on their... more highway capabilities. The reviewer highlights Super Cruise's true hands-free operation and its smooth, non-intrusive disengagement/re-engagement for lane changes as significant advantages, particularly for road trips. However, its major drawback is its strict reliance on pre-mapped highways, rendering it unusable in other conditions. Tesla's FSD, while requiring more driver input (slight turning force), is praised for its versatility, working on any road, city streets, and highways, and its constant evolution through AI. The reviewer notes that while Super Cruise excels in its specific, limited use case, FSD's all-encompassing functionality and continuous development make it the preferred choice, especially as it moves towards a hands-free experience. less
2024 Chevy Equinox EV Is Finally Here | Full Review
The 2024 Chevrolet Equinox EV is presented as a compelling, albeit imperfect, contender in the electric SUV market. The reviewer highlights the attrac... moretive and sporty exterior design, noting its departure from the standard Equinox. The driving experience is praised for its smoothness, quietness, and a premium feel that belies its price point. The all-wheel-drive version's 288 horsepower is found to be well-suited to the vehicle's size, offering good acceleration, and the seats are surprisingly comfortable. However, the interior materials, particularly on the door panels, are criticized for feeling cheap, especially given the vehicle's price. The reviewer also finds the center console design somewhat impractical and the infotainment graphics, while responsive, are not a favorite. A significant point of contention is the Auto Park Assist feature, which is demonstrated to be unreliable and even problematic, parking the vehicle on a curb. Despite these drawbacks, the reviewer concludes that Chevrolet has done a good job, making the Equinox EV a potentially strong starter EV that offers SUV practicality in an electric platform at an accessible price. less
2024 Tesla Model 3 | POV ASMR Test Drive
This video offers a relaxing, ASMR-focused test drive of the 2024 Tesla Model 3, emphasizing auditory experiences and a calm driving environment. The ... morereviewer highlights various aspects of the vehicle, including exterior and interior features, with a significant portion dedicated to sound tests at different speeds and conditions. While the video provides a unique sensory experience, it lacks detailed driving impressions or critical analysis of the Model 3's performance, handling, or technology beyond the soundscape. The focus remains on the 'feel' and 'sound' of the car, making it more of an ambient exploration than a comprehensive review. less
Is FSD 12.3.6 an Improvement?
Metz Tech tests the latest FSD v12.3.6 on a 2024 Tesla Model 3, noting incremental improvements over previous versions. The reviewer highlights FSD�... more39;s enhanced safety, particularly in a critical situation where it detected a child on a bicycle that the human driver might have missed. However, the system still exhibits some awkward behaviors, such as 'swimming' between lanes, overly cautious stopping distances, and jerky acceleration/braking, especially when stationary. The reviewer also points out the system's tendency to be overly hesitant at intersections, waiting for excessively large gaps in traffic, which can be frustrating for other drivers. Despite these quirks, the general city driving and handling of back roads are described as nearly perfect. The video concludes that while FSD 12.3.6 is an improvement, it still has a way to go in terms of naturalistic driving and decisiveness, though its safety capabilities are a significant positive. less
Should You Buy a Model 3 or Ioniq 6 in 2025? Ultimate Owners Review
This video offers a comprehensive owner-to-owner comparison between the 2024 Tesla Model 3 (RWD Base) and the 2023 Hyundai Ioniq 6 (SE AWD). The revie... morewer highlights the Model 3's superior frunk space, advanced app functionality, and the premium feel of its interior materials, particularly the perforated and ventilated seats and the expansive glass roof. However, the Ioniq 6 is praised for its more engaging driving dynamics, distinctive pixelated design language, and the adjustability of its regenerative braking. Key differences noted include the Model 3's minimalist interior, reliance on screen controls for HVAC, and lack of physical stalks, contrasting with the Ioniq 6's more traditional, albeit less premium, interior and more sensitive acceleration. The video also touches on charging infrastructure, with Tesla's network being a significant advantage. Ultimately, the choice hinges on priorities: minimalist tech and app integration versus driving engagement and unique styling. less
My 2024 Model 3 Finally Has FSD 12.3.4!
The reviewer tests FSD v12.3.3 on a 2024 Model 3, highlighting its capabilities and limitations. While FSD excels at point-to-point navigation on both... more city streets and highways, a feat unmatched by competitors like BlueCruise or Super Cruise, it exhibits some concerning behaviors. The system can be overly cautious, sometimes taking convoluted routes or braking unnecessarily. In construction zones, it struggled significantly, twice heading directly towards cones at high speed, requiring manual intervention. The reviewer also notes the visualization can be jittery and questions if the full potential of Hardware 4 cameras is yet realized. A critical test involving an unprotected left turn across four lanes was failed, with the car creeping but ultimately refusing to proceed, forcing the reviewer to take over. Despite these issues, the reviewer maintains FSD's unique ability for end-to-end navigation is superior to other systems, though acknowledges the need for significant improvement, especially in complex or unmarked environments. less
My First FSD 12.3 Experience Was a Mixed Bag
The reviewer provides a first-hand account of their experience with Tesla's FSD v12.3, using a 2018 Model 3 Long Range as a test vehicle. The FSD... more v12.3 demonstrated notable improvements over v11, particularly in its handling of a deceptive furniture store sign that previously caused v11 to brake unnecessarily. It also correctly navigated a green turning arrow. However, the system was not without its flaws. The reviewer experienced several disengagements due to the FSD making incorrect lane choices, particularly in a complex construction zone and during a tricky highway merge. Phantom braking also occurred on the highway, a behavior the reviewer hoped was resolved in this version. Despite these issues, the reviewer found v12.3 to be more assertive and aggressive in its driving style, which they generally viewed as a positive, especially in situations requiring quicker acceleration. The overall verdict is a 'mixed bag,' with clear advancements but also areas needing significant improvement, especially in complex and unpredictable environments. less
Should You Buy a Model 3 or Model Y in 2024?
This video offers a detailed comparison between the 2024 Tesla Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive (Highland update) and the 2024 Model Y Performance. The review... moreer highlights significant improvements in the Model 3's interior materials, fit, and finish, noting a more premium feel compared to the current Model Y. Key differences include the Model 3's sleeker headlights, lack of fog lights, redesigned interior with no stalks, and improved cabin materials. The Model Y, while an older design awaiting its 'Juniper' refresh, still offers more cargo space and a higher driving position. Performance-wise, the Model Y Performance boasts quicker acceleration (3.5s 0-60) and a slightly longer range (279 miles) than the Model 3 RWD (5.8s 0-60, 272 miles range). The reviewer praises the Model 3's refined cabin, better rear visibility, and touch-capacitive controls, while acknowledging the Model Y's practicality as an SUV. The video concludes that while the current Model Y has some dated elements, the upcoming refresh is expected to bring it up to par with the updated Model 3. less
Should You Buy a 2024 Model Y or Wait? 2024 Model Y Performance Review
The 2024 Tesla Model Y Performance is reviewed as a highly capable and quick SUV, building on the familiar Tesla experience. The reviewer highlights i... morets brutal acceleration, achieving 0-60 mph in a claimed 3.5 seconds, and its practical SUV form factor with ample cargo space and easy entry/exit. However, the review points out several areas where the current generation falls short compared to the updated Model 3 Highland and anticipates improvements in the upcoming 2025 refresh. Criticisms include less premium interior materials (e.g., plastic door panels), a lack of ventilated seats (leading to a sweaty back in warm weather), and a slightly outdated steering wheel design with physical stalks. Road and wind noise are noted as being more pronounced than in the Model 3. Visibility out the tiny rear windshield is also a significant drawback, necessitating reliance on cameras. Despite these points, the reviewer acknowledges the car's solid build and enjoyable driving dynamics, concluding that the decision to buy now or wait for the 2025 model hinges on priorities: immediate availability and potential tax credits versus improved interior quality and features. less