carwow

Mercedes EQS vs S-Class Review and Range Test: Petrol vs Electric!

In a compelling head-to-head, the Mercedes EQS (entry-level RWD) is pitted against the Mercedes S-Class (3.0L petrol AWD) to determine the superior lu... morexury vehicle. The reviewer highlights the EQS's superior braking performance (41m vs 45m) and its quieter, more refined driving experience, particularly praising its comfort and instant acceleration. However, the S-Class is noted for feeling more nimble and sporty on twisty roads, largely due to its lighter weight and AWD. Interiorly, the S-Class is lauded for its classic luxury feel, exterior design, and the iconic three-pointed star, while the EQS impresses with its futuristic, screen-dominated dashboard, though some elements feel less premium. Practicality favors the EQS with its larger hatchback boot. In terms of range and endurance, the petrol S-Class demonstrates a clear advantage, especially after aggressive track driving, whereas the EQS struggled to maintain its battery charge. Despite the S-Class's strengths, the reviewer ultimately chooses the EQS as the "S-Class of the future," appreciating its advanced technology and serene driving dynamics. less

New Defender v Old Defender: Off-Road Challenge

This video pits the new Land Rover Defender 90 against a Tesla-powered 2010 Defender conversion in a series of off-road challenges and on-road compari... moresons. The new Defender, equipped with a 3.0-litre diesel engine (D250 trim), impressed with its advanced technology like Clear Sight cameras and Terrain Response, making off-roading accessible and comfortable. Its independent suspension and refined interior also make it a superior daily driver and a more luxurious SUV. The electric Defender, boasting 450hp from a Tesla Model S powertrain, demonstrated incredible off-road capability, particularly in its direct throttle control and serene operation. However, its steep £150,000 price tag, single-speed transmission, and lack of hill descent control were noted drawbacks. While both vehicles excelled off-road, the reviewer's ideal scenario would be the electric powertrain integrated into the new Defender's chassis, highlighting a missed opportunity for Jaguar Land Rover. less

Citroen Ami Review - The Weirdest EV In The World!

The Citroen Ami is presented as a unique, ultra-compact electric vehicle primarily for young drivers in France, costing around €6,000. While its quirk... morey, toy-like design and extreme maneuverability (with a turning circle better than a London black cab) are noted positives, its performance is severely limited, topping out at just over 25 mph with a range of approximately 45 miles. The reviewer highlights several drawbacks, including a lack of air conditioning, a basic interior with no integrated tech, questionable safety features due to its quadricycle classification, and a single windscreen wiper. Despite its affordability and potential for cheap urban rental, the Ami is deemed impractical and undesirable for most buyers, with the reviewer humorously suggesting a 17-year-old Jaguar S-Type V8 as a more sensible alternative for general consumers. less

BMW M5 CS v AMG GT v Audi RS6 v Porsche Panamera: Review & 0-60mph, 1/4 Mile, Brake & Drift Test!

This comprehensive group test pits four German performance titans against each other: the BMW M5 CS, Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door, Audi RS6, and Porsche Pan... moreamera Turbo S e-Hybrid. The reviewer, Mat Watson, highlights the M5 CS as the standout performer, praising its incredible handling, raw driving experience, and significant improvements over the standard M5, deeming it a "GT racing car with space for four." While acknowledging the AMG GT's bombastic nature and fun factor, and the RS6's all-around brilliance and practicality, Watson finds them less engaging than the BMW. The Porsche Panamera, despite its impressive power and technology, is ultimately ranked last due to its perceived weight and high cost. The review covers engine specs, design, driving dynamics on twisty roads, interior quality, drifting capabilities, braking performance, practicality, and acceleration tests, ultimately crowning the BMW M5 CS the winner for its sheer driving enjoyment and focused performance. less

Tesla Model X vs Fiat Panda Cross: Up-Hill Drag Race & Which Is Best Off-Road

This video pits the Fiat Panda Cross 4x4 against the Tesla Model X in a series of off-road challenges, aiming to determine which is superior in challe... morenging terrain. Despite the Tesla's significant power and advanced features, the lighter and more agile Fiat Panda Cross consistently outperformed it in most tests. The Panda's smaller size, nimbleness, and surprisingly capable all-wheel-drive system allowed it to navigate obstacles with greater ease. The Tesla, while powerful, struggled with its considerable weight, longer wheelbase, and less forgiving suspension, frequently bottoming out or getting stuck. The review highlights the Panda's unexpected off-road prowess, making it the clear winner of the comparison, much to the surprise of the presenters. less

Buying My Mom an Electric Car... But Which Will She Choose?

This video pits six electric cars against each other to help Mat's mother choose her next vehicle. The contenders are split into two price bracke... morets: the more affordable Peugeot e-2008, Volkswagen ID.3, and Vauxhall Mokka-e, and the premium Audi Q4 e-tron, Volvo XC40 Electric, and Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus. The reviewer highlights key features, interior space, practicality, and crucially, real-world range. The Peugeot e-2008 and VW ID.3 impressed with their practicality and driving experience, while the Vauxhall Mokka-e fell short due to its smaller boot and perceived lower quality. In the premium segment, the Tesla Model 3 stands out for its advanced technology, spacious interior, and superior charging infrastructure, despite a lower driving position. The Audi Q4 e-tron offers SUV practicality and a modern interior, though manual seat adjustment on lower trims and a less engaging drive compared to the Tesla are noted. The Volvo XC40 is praised for its solid build and practicality but feels dated and less refined than the Tesla. Ultimately, the mother leans towards the Tesla for its 'special' feel, but the father opts for the more sensible Volkswagen ID.3, with a coin toss deciding the final purchase, which lands in favor of the Tesla, much to the father's financial chagrin. less

Honda NSX vs Nissan GT-R NISMO Review With 0-60mph, 1/4-Mile + Brake Test!

In this head-to-head comparison, the Nissan GT-R NISMO and Honda NSX are pitted against each other to determine Japan's top supercar. The reviewe... morer highlights the GT-R's raw, analog driving experience, praising its aggressive feel, communicative hydraulic steering, and powerful acceleration, ultimately deeming it more of an 'event' and awarding it the win for its personality and 'refreshingly archaic' mechanical nature. While the NSX is commended for its smoother, more refined, and confidence-inspiring hybrid performance, its slightly artificial engine note and less engaging driving dynamics are noted. The GT-R NISMO's superior practicality, with a larger boot and rear seats, is also a significant advantage. Despite the NSX's better braking performance (41m vs 44m) and more comfortable ride, the GT-R NISMO's overall character and driving reward ultimately win out for the reviewer. less

BMW X3 v Audi Q5 v Volvo XC60: Up-Hill Drag Race & Which Is Best Off-Road

In this head-to-head comparison, the BMW X3, Audi Q5, and Volvo XC60 were put through a series of six off-road challenges to determine the ultimate fa... moremily SUV for tackling rough terrain. The BMW X3, specifically the 30e hybrid model, showcased strong initial performance, particularly in the uphill drag race thanks to its electric boost, and ultimately won the overall competition. However, it struggled with ground clearance and weight in more extreme obstacles. The Audi Q5, with its Quattro all-wheel-drive system, demonstrated excellent control and momentum, especially on descents and during chassis articulation tests, securing a close second place. The Volvo XC60, despite having the most ground clearance, lagged behind in several challenges, particularly in articulation and the final obstacle course, finishing third. While all three SUVs proved surprisingly capable off-road for their intended purpose, the BMW X3 emerged as the victor, albeit with noted compromises in its heavier hybrid setup. less

Modded Classic Defenders Review - Blasted Off-Road and Timed 0-60mph!

This video showcases two heavily modified electric Land Rover Defenders, one a classic model and the other a 2010 version, both converted by Electric ... moreClassic Cars. The reviewer, Mat Watson, is impressed by the off-road capabilities, highlighting the precise control offered by the electric powertrains, especially the regenerative braking and softened throttle response in 'Doris'. He notes that the electric conversion surprisingly enhances off-road performance, allowing for silent crawling and better traction control. On-road, the performance is astonishing, with 0-60mph times recorded as low as 3.95 seconds, offering immense acceleration. However, the high cost (starting at £125,000) is a significant barrier. While the reviewer loves the concept and performance, he acknowledges the prohibitive price tag. The Spectre Defender is noted for its aggressive styling and performance, while 'Doris' offers a more minimalist retro look and refined off-road manners. The reviewer concludes that while he'd buy one if he could afford it, the price makes it a unique, albeit inaccessible, proposition for most. less

Mercedes C-Class 2021 Review - S-Class Luxury For Less!

The 2021 Mercedes C-Class is presented as a compelling option, aiming to deliver S-Class luxury at a more accessible price point. The reviewer praises... more its stylish and youthful interior design, high-quality materials in key areas, and advanced technology, particularly the infotainment system and driver display. The driving experience is highlighted as comfortable and refined, with adaptive dampers offering a good balance between a plush ride and composed handling, even in sportier modes. The reviewer notes its quiet cabin and smooth ride, making it suitable for long distances. However, criticisms include the prevalence of fake design elements (diffuser, exhaust tips), some cheaper-feeling plastics in less visible areas, and the touch-sensitive steering wheel buttons being fiddly. The boot capacity is also noted as being smaller than key rivals like the Audi A4 and BMW 3 Series. The reviewer concludes that if comfort and technology are top priorities, the C-Class is a strong contender, though it doesn't quite match the outright sportiness of a BMW 3 Series. less

Audi RS e-tron GT vs Porsche Taycan Turbo - Which Is Best?

In this comparison, the Audi RS e-tron GT and Porsche Taycan Turbo, despite sharing underlying architecture, are presented with distinct personalities... more. The reviewer highlights the Audi's superior interior quality and a more comfortable, cruiser-oriented driving experience with a sporty edge, making it the preferred choice for everyday usability. While the Taycan offers a sharper, more intense sporty feel and a slightly quicker 0-60 mph time (when not battery-limited), its interior materials are deemed less premium, and its infotainment and climate controls are less intuitive for driving. The Audi's real-world range was measured at 218 miles from a 2.6 miles/kWh average, while the Taycan achieved 183 miles from a 2.1 miles/kWh average, with the reviewer attributing the Taycan's lower figure partly to less efficient driving. Both cars offer practical storage, though neither excels in boot space compared to smaller hatchbacks. Ultimately, the Audi RS e-tron GT is favored for its blend of comfort, practicality, and refined interior, making it the winner for the reviewer's personal preference. less

Audi Q4 E-tron 2021 Review

The Audi Q4 e-tron is presented as a strong contender in the electric SUV segment, particularly for UK buyers. The reviewer praises its stylish exteri... moreor and interior design, noting it's more visually appealing than the Volkswagen ID.4. Positives include a spacious and well-built cabin, comfortable seating, and practical features like separate climate controls and ample rear passenger room. The driving experience is described as quiet, relaxing, and surprisingly capable, with a low center of gravity contributing to good handling. However, the review highlights several drawbacks. The pricing, starting just over £40,000, disqualifies it from the UK government grant, making it expensive. Criticisms are leveled at the unnecessary large front grille, the use of touch-sensitive buttons that can be fiddly, the outdated drum brakes at the rear, and the lack of a front boot. While the infotainment is generally good, the inability to project smartphone navigation onto the digital driver's display is a miss. The real-world range achieved was approximately 270 miles from the 82kWh battery, which is decent but not class-leading. Despite its flaws, the reviewer ultimately recommends the Q4 e-tron as the best small electric SUV available in the UK, pending the arrival of the Tesla Model Y. less

Audi RS e-tron GT vs Tesla Model S: 571-Mile Scotland-to-London Race and Review

This video pits the Audi RS e-tron GT against the Tesla Model S Long Range in a 571-mile race from Scotland to London, focusing on real-world range, c... moreharging, and overall driving experience. The Audi impresses with its sporty design, luxurious interior, and exhilarating performance, particularly its rapid acceleration and flat cornering. However, its practicality is limited, with less rear headroom and a smaller boot. The Tesla, while less visually striking and with a more dated interior, offers superior practicality, a more intuitive infotainment system (despite lacking Apple CarPlay/Android Auto), and a simpler charging experience thanks to the Supercharger network. In the race, the Audi's faster charging was offset by the Tesla's better efficiency and simpler charging strategy, with the Tesla ultimately winning due to a navigational error by the Audi driver. The reviewer highlights the Audi's premium feel and driving dynamics against the Tesla's ease of use and practicality for long-distance EV travel. less

Rimac Nevera Review: World's Fastest EV With 258mph Top Speed!

The Rimac Nevera is presented as the pinnacle of electric hypercars, boasting staggering performance figures with 1,914hp and 2,360Nm of torque, enabl... moreing it to achieve 0-60mph in 2.23 seconds and a quarter-mile in 8.85 seconds. The reviewer highlights its bespoke, carbon-fiber construction, advanced aerodynamics with active elements, and a class-leading 120kWh battery. While praised for its immense power, incredible acceleration, and surprisingly manageable driving dynamics, even in drift mode, the Nevera isn't without its drawbacks. Criticisms include the plasticky feel of some interior elements, the reliance on a touchscreen for most functions, a small glovebox, limited luggage space (100 liters), and intrusive cabin noise due to the lack of engine sound deadening. The brakes are noted as slightly over-assisted initially. Despite these points, the Nevera is lauded for its global homologation and the potential for extreme performance. The verdict is clear: for those with the means and desire for the absolute fastest accelerating car, it's a buy; for most others, its performance makes every other car feel slow, making it best avoided for practical reasons. less

Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo 2021 Review

The Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo is presented as the world's first mass-produced electric estate car with off-roading capabilities. While the ext... moreerior styling sees minor 'off-roady' cosmetic updates and a slightly higher ride height (up to 30mm), the interior remains largely identical to the standard Taycan, offering excellent material quality and impressive screens. Practicality is a mixed bag: rear boot space is only marginally larger than the standard Taycan, and rear passenger footwell space can be tight. The reviewer highlights the car's exceptional performance, particularly the Turbo model's 680hp (761hp with launch control) and 1050Nm of torque, delivering blistering acceleration. The Cross Turismo also introduces a 'gravel mode' and enhanced suspension for light off-roading, though its true off-road prowess is limited. Annoyances include the protruding dash element, an uncomfortable rear armrest due to cupholders, and a cumbersome solid parcel shelf. Cool features include a compass, sustainable leather options, a bike rack compatibility, high-definition surround view cameras, and night vision assist. Charging is rapid, with up to 270kW capability for an 80% charge in just over 20 minutes. Ultimately, for those seeking an electric estate with some off-road ability, the Taycan Cross Turismo is presented as a compelling, albeit expensive, choice with few direct competitors. less

New Mercedes EQS Review & Tested 0-60mph - Is It As Quick As A Tesla?

The Mercedes EQS is presented as a technologically advanced and luxurious electric sedan, aiming to rival the Tesla Model S and Porsche Taycan. The re... moreviewer highlights its striking design, comparable to the S-Class, and impressive performance figures, particularly for the 580 trim which achieves 0-60 mph in 3.98 seconds. The interior is lauded for its high-quality, man-made materials and the expansive 'Hyperscreen' dashboard, though the reviewer notes that physical buttons are still preferred for some functions. Comfort is emphasized, with standard air suspension, advanced bump-reading technology, and exceptional sound deadening contributing to a quiet and smooth ride. Practicality is enhanced by a hatchback tailgate and ample storage. However, the reviewer points out that some desirable features, like the full 10-degree rear-wheel steering, are optional extras. While the reviewer hasn't driven the car extensively for a definitive verdict, initial impressions suggest impressive tech, comfort, speed, and quietness, with a starting price of around £80,000 for the 450+ and £100,000 for the 580. less

Skoda Enyaq 2021 In-Depth EV Review

The Skoda Enyaq 2021 is presented as a competent, if not groundbreaking, all-round electric SUV. The reviewer highlights its practical and spacious in... moreterior, featuring good quality materials in most areas and a large 13-inch infotainment screen, though notes some cheaper plastics in less visible spots. The driving experience is described as smooth and quiet in town, with good maneuverability thanks to its electric platform. On faster roads, it offers a serene and comfortable ride, aided by cruise control and lane-keeping assist. However, the reviewer points out that its weight necessitates stiffer suspension, leading to a firmer ride over bumps compared to petrol equivalents. Real-world range is a concern, with the tested model achieving approximately 162 miles from a claimed 256 miles, a significant shortfall attributed to mixed driving conditions. While not the most exciting to drive, its practicality, spaciousness, and ease of use make it a strong contender, earning it a 'shortlist' recommendation. less

Mustang Mach-E 2021 Review - An EV That You Actually Want!

The Ford Mustang Mach-E 2021 is presented as a stylish and premium electric SUV that aims to leverage the Mustang heritage. The reviewer praises its e... morexterior design, particularly the coupe-like rear and Mustang-inspired front, and finds the interior quality to be superior to competitors like the VW ID.4, highlighting good materials and an interesting design with a large, responsive central screen. Rear passenger space is noted as exceptionally generous due to the long wheelbase and flat floor. However, the review points out several drawbacks: the standard 18-inch wheels look small, the boot space is less than rivals, and there are five "annoying features" including a hidden physical de-mist button, stiff interior door pulls, and an over-lubricated boot release. On the driving front, while acceleration is instant and handling is competent with minimal body lean, the steering feels slightly rubbery, and the ride can be firm and bouncy. The brakes also have an unnatural transition between regenerative and friction systems. Real-world range achieved was 247 miles from the 88kWh battery, significantly short of the claimed 379 miles. The verdict is to shortlist the Mach-E, acknowledging its premium feel and good looks but cautioning about its ride, handling, and range discrepancies. less

Ford Kuga 2021 Review

The Ford Kuga 2021 is presented as a significant redesign, aiming to challenge established rivals like the Peugeot 3008 and Volkswagen Tiguan. The ext... moreerior is noted for its resemblance to a pumped-up Focus, with a sporty rear slope and the welcome inclusion of real exhaust pipes. Inside, the cabin offers good quality higher up, though lower plastics feel cheaper. Practicality is generally strong, with ample rear passenger space and a decent boot, although the plug-in hybrid version sees a reduction in cargo capacity. The reviewer highlights the extensive engine range, particularly praising the plug-in hybrid's 35-mile electric-only range and efficient operation when plugged in regularly, though its real-world average is noted at 65 mpg. Downsides include a small rear wiper, exposed sills that can get dirty, a fiddly infotainment system, and a slightly unnatural brake pedal feel on the PHEV. Despite some quirks like overly enthusiastic steering and a droning CVT on acceleration, the Kuga is deemed a competent family SUV, especially recommended in its plug-in hybrid form, earning a 'consider' verdict overall, with a 'shortlist' recommendation for the PHEV. less

Audi Q5 2021 Review - Better Than a BMW X3 & Mercedes GLC?

The updated Audi Q5 receives a mid-life facelift, bringing notable design tweaks and an improved infotainment system. While the exterior sees a wider ... moregrille and standard LEDs (with optional Matrix LEDs), the interior benefits from a large touchscreen with Audi's latest OS and a standard digital driver's display. The reviewer highlights the premium feel and build quality, but criticizes the placement of USB ports and the loss of the rotary infotainment controller. Practicality is generally good, with ample rear space and a 550-liter boot, though the rear window drop is noted as insufficient. Performance is strong, particularly the 2.0-liter petrol engine tested, which exceeded its 0-60mph claim. The reviewer finds the Q5 a relaxing and capable cruiser, handling twisty roads well thanks to its AWD system. However, the sport suspension can feel bumpy, and the optional air suspension is a costly fix. Fake exhaust vents at the front and rear are a notable detractor. Overall, the Q5 is recommended as a strong contender in the family SUV segment, worthy of being shortlisted against rivals like the BMW X3 and Mercedes GLC. less

Porsche Panamera ST 4S 2021 Review - See How Quick It Really Is To 60mph!

The 2021 Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo 4S is presented as a practical yet sporty estate, aiming to compete with rivals like the Audi RS6 and AMG E63 ... moreS. The facelift brings subtle exterior tweaks, including a revised light bar and new alloy wheel designs, while the interior sees minor updates like a new steering wheel and improved infotainment features. The reviewer praises the build quality, driving position, and the responsiveness of the infotainment system, noting the retention of physical climate controls and the appealing digital/analog dash combination. However, practicality is a mixed bag: while rear passenger space is decent, the central console hinders comfort for a middle passenger, and the boot, though functional with electric seat folding, is smaller than the RS6's and has a noticeable load lip. Annoyances include the start button placement, lack of a cup holder cover, and the absence of Android Auto. On the positive side, the reviewer highlights the clever retractable load cover, standard air suspension with adjustable height, and the impressive optional sound systems. The 4S model tested, a hybrid, offers a 0-60 mph time of 4.2 seconds, demonstrating strong performance despite struggling for traction. Ultimately, the Panamera Sport Turismo is deemed a very good car, but not the most practical performance estate, earning a recommendation to shortlist it. less

Volkswagen ID.4 EV Review: Is It The New VW Beetle?

The Volkswagen ID.4 is presented as a significant contender in the burgeoning electric SUV market, aiming to be the "new car of the people."... more The "First Edition" trim, reviewed here, starts at a considerable £40,800, though savings are available through carwow. While the exterior design is polarizing, described as "blobby and heavy," the interior offers a minimalist and modern aesthetic with some unique touches like a cream steering wheel and brown trim. However, the user interface, relying heavily on touch sliders and haptic steering wheel buttons, is criticized for being unintuitive and difficult to use while driving. The voice command system is also deemed "glitchy." Practicality is a strong suit, with ample rear-seat space, a decent boot (though smaller than the Tiguan's), and clever storage solutions. The reviewer notes some cheap-feeling materials despite the car's price point. On the road, the ID.4 offers a comfortable ride, especially at speed, with light steering and a good turning circle. However, its 2.1-ton weight impacts efficiency and handling, resulting in a real-world range of approximately 260 miles, significantly less than the claimed 310 miles. While secure and balanced, it lacks the fun factor of rivals like the Tesla Model 3. The 0-60 mph time is a respectable 7.49 seconds. Ultimately, the ID.4 is recommended as a "good all-round family-friendly practical electric SUV" worthy of shortlisting. less

Polestar 2 vs Tesla Model 3: Comparison Review & Real-World Range Test

This comparison review pits the Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus and Performance against the Polestar 2 in a real-world range test around the M25. Th... moree reviewer found the Tesla Model 3 Performance to be the clear winner, achieving 286.1 miles, which was 81% of its claimed range and the furthest distance of the three. The Standard Range Plus Tesla followed with 218.6 miles (70% of claim), while the Polestar 2 lagged significantly, covering only 197.1 miles (68% of claim). While the Polestar 2 was praised for its interior design and exterior looks, its real-world range and charging speed were found to be inferior to the Teslas. The reviewer highlighted Tesla's superior battery management and charging infrastructure as key advantages. Ultimately, the entry-level Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus was recommended as the best value due to its sufficient range and lower cost, followed by the Performance model, with the Polestar 2 ranking last. less

A-Z Best New Cars Coming 2021-2023 Including The New Audi RS3

This "A-Z" roundup of upcoming vehicles from 2021-2023, presented by Mat Watson on Carwow, offers a broad overview of new models across vari... moreous manufacturers. The video highlights key releases, including the Audi RS3, BMW M3/M4, Hyundai Ioniq 5, and several electric offerings from Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen. Watson provides estimated pricing and release timelines, with a particular focus on performance figures and design elements. While the review touches upon a wide range of vehicles, it lacks in-depth analysis of any single model, serving more as a preview than a comprehensive evaluation. The inclusion of the Audi RS3, with its anticipated 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine and power upgrade, is a notable highlight for performance enthusiasts. However, the video's rapid pace and extensive coverage mean that detailed driving impressions or comparisons are minimal. less

Koenigsegg v Tesla Plaid v Turbo Hayabusa: Drag Race

We Drove These Electric Cars Until They Died!

I Broke the 1/4-Mile World Record in This New Hypercar!

Tesla Model 3 In-Depth Review - See Why It’s The Best Electric Car In The World!

Tesla Cybertruck vs Hummer EV: Drag Race

MotoGP Bike v Rimac Nevera v Turbo Hayabusa: Drag Race

Latest Additions